Lindy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5176 times:
He wasnt that close. He was probably standing close to the nose gear of this aircraft and used little zoom on it. If I remember correctly. Safe distance to stand by working engine on 737 is 13 feet I dont know whats the distance for 747.
TrnsWrld From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1112 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5157 times:
Yeah it may be 13 ft at idle, but what about up to 100% throttle?? Remember that engine isnt just turning at idle. I really have no idea about safe distances from the engine while running, but its gotta be a lot more than 13ft from a full throttle RB211. Correct me if im wrong.
Heavymetal From Ireland, joined May 2015, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4994 times:
A question for either the photog or anyone who has ever been in this arraingement....from the presumed distance the photographer was from the intake, would he be feeling more than a gentle breeze blowing past him and into the engine at this point?
Airplanetire From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1809 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4901 times:
What keeps the aircraft from going anywhere when it is going at 100% thrust? I don't think the things that go under the wheels would do it. Also, how is the aircraft not damaged from not going anywhere? I would imagine that the landing gears are under a lot of strain with engines running at 100% thrust and not having the plane go anywhere. But then again, landing gears are probably pretty strong because they can withstand a plane landing and that has to be a lot of pressure on them. Amazing picture though!
VC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3724 posts, RR: 31
Reply 17, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4713 times:
Only one engine is run a high power at a time, incidentally it is not full TO power but a proportion of it. While this engine is at high power another engine at the other side will be at fairly high power in an effort to balance the the a/c.
The a/c is normally restrained on the brakes only. When I run engines at LHR I taxi the a/c to r/w 23 block 40, set the park brake and away you go.
Panman From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Aug 1999, 790 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks ago) and read 4547 times:
VC-10, do you do the trick that the cola airline do (or at least they did for the 4 months last year that I worked with them). Ask permission from the tower to do an idle power engine run. Then when an aicraft taxis past crank it up to whatever thrust you need and then back to idle before the aircraft passes.??
The first time I saw the cert engineer doing that I laughed - it was in one of their 747-200s (the one that makes you sleep).
Some easy cryptic clues there as to the airline and which one of their 747-200s they used by the way - the hardcore reg spotters should work it out easy enough.
Skymaster From Denmark, joined Apr 2001, 228 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks ago) and read 4530 times:
When making engine test on fighters att full poewer and afterburner you lower the hook and connect it to a heavy wire which is firmly attached in concrete. The place is normally surrounded with blast shields. A grid is placed on the intake to secure the ground crew. At least this is the way we do it in Denmark on our F-16´ s.
I will upload a pricture of it.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 50
Reply 21, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4470 times:
Back when I used to turn up F-4s and F-14's, I could run both engines up to around 80% with just the brakes depending on the fuel load. You would get some creep over that. To go to full Military (Burner) Chains and the hold back cable were required. Do they make intake screens for airliners? I've never seen one installed.