Sokol From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 284 posts, RR: 3 Posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1472 times:
Hi All,
How come some of these pictures was rejected, to me they look very good
not bad and they was rejected.
Can you help with these rejections I want to know for sure the problem of these pictures.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 53 Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1458 times:
Sokol,
Those last few shots taken in Alaska are great. I am sure they gave reasons for each rejection. No armchair screening from me though. See what the others say.
PRM From Ghana, joined Apr 2002, 348 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1391 times:
Sokol,
Yes those two are great shots! The slightly soft China might be salvaged by using some more adaptive USM, or a higher strength USM in Photoshop on the original file; but if the problem with the SQ is the overexposure on the fuselage then I don't think there is much you can do to restore the detail lost..
Apuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3026 posts, RR: 13 Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1382 times:
Hi,
Nice pictures. But some of them are not up to A.net standards I think. Have you looked at your own appeal page? For each picture it gives you the reason why it was rejected. So, if you're aware of those reasons, you might be able to improve them.
However some pictures:
- have too much noise (stairs, trucks,...)
- some of them are blurry/soft
- on some pictures, such as the Jumbo landing, the white is 'too white', you know what I mean?
- not level.
It's also possible that some of them were rejected because of 'badcommon'.
Just try to improve your technique a little bit. You already have the talent!