PRM From Burkina Faso, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2727 times:
Yes those two are great shots! The slightly soft China might be salvaged by using some more adaptive USM, or a higher strength USM in Photoshop on the original file; but if the problem with the SQ is the overexposure on the fuselage then I don't think there is much you can do to restore the detail lost..
Apuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2718 times:
Nice pictures. But some of them are not up to A.net standards I think. Have you looked at your own appeal page? For each picture it gives you the reason why it was rejected. So, if you're aware of those reasons, you might be able to improve them.
However some pictures:
- have too much noise (stairs, trucks,...)
- some of them are blurry/soft
- on some pictures, such as the Jumbo landing, the white is 'too white', you know what I mean?
- not level.
It's also possible that some of them were rejected because of 'badcommon'.
Just try to improve your technique a little bit. You already have the talent!