Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Good, Non-SLR Digicams?  
User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 679 posts, RR: 1
Posted (13 years 6 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2516 times:


I know that there has been lots of talk of digi cams here, but mostly $1k+ cameras that are SLRs- unfortunately, I can nowhere near afford one of those, so I wanted to know if there are any non-SLR digi cams with a good zoom, or if there are any SLRs that might be a little older and somewhat cheap (few hundred $$$ tops) on eBay or some other wholesale venue.

One camera I saw today was as follows:

2.1 megapixel
3x optical/2x digital zoom
64mb memory card
docking station
inkjet printer

All of that was for $200- is it a good deal? I don't know if the zoom is enough for good aviation pics- I will be flying a lot in December and want to take pictures, but I don't have the money to develop a lot of film, so a digi cam would allow me to take the many pictures I want.

Any and all help is greatly appreciated.



Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 813 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1462 times:

To be brutally honest, digicams in your price bracket are not really suitable for much aside from static ramp shots in perfect conditions, OK, sometimes you'll get lucky, and some people manage remarkable results, but on the whole you'll be disappointed.

Two major handicaps (aside from basic limitations in image quality) are

1 - shutter lag ... a real problem with budget cameras... this means you press the shutter and there is a significant dealy before the picture is actually taken. This makes anything but static shots nect to impossible.

2 - focal length - typically, moderate wide angle to very short telephoto. Forget the digital zoom ... this is simply an enlargement of the optical image and the quality is distinctly substandard.

So what to do ... for $200 you should be able to get yourself a used SLR and a mid range zoom (70-200mm). If you are prepared to forgo some automation (eg. autofocus) and spend some time learning "real" photography, you will get excellent results with practice. OK film is a cost ... but so is printer ink. And ultimately, I doubt you will ever get A.net quality shots with that bargain digicam ... nor will you learn much about photography.

If you just want some holiday snaps (and nothing wrong with that), go with the digicam. If you think you want to take up photography a little more seriously, go with a basic SLR. You'll learn a lot more and set the foundation for a lifelong hobby.



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Good Non-AF Zoom Lenses For Canon T-60s posted Wed Aug 1 2001 20:56:05 by Western727
I Bought An SLR Finaly! Is It A Good One? posted Mon Aug 20 2007 18:36:41 by BoeingFever777
Advise On A Good SLR Camera posted Mon May 30 2005 09:03:16 by B787
Digicams With Good Zoom Under $700CAD posted Wed Dec 1 2004 22:16:44 by JAGflyer
What Is A Good SLR For Under $500. posted Sun Oct 8 2000 04:21:02 by BA
Good Enough? posted Tue Sep 4 2007 23:41:54 by Luvaulter
Morning Shots - Good Enough posted Sat Sep 1 2007 20:41:19 by Carlos
Good Place To Photo At Heathrow - Without Car posted Fri Aug 17 2007 17:28:13 by Woodentom
A Good Motive? posted Fri Aug 10 2007 09:52:36 by Carlos
Does This Make A Good Tail Shot? posted Tue Jul 31 2007 18:35:12 by Whappeh