Glenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2662 times:
Nope no blurring is permissable.
sometimes you just have to wait for an aweful long time to get a shot. I waited for about 20 minutes at Adelaide once for the crowd to move from in fromnt of a Mirage. Even just sat on the Tarmac and waited for them to disperse. Got close about 5 times but always one straggler walked slow enough to give another time to walk into view
RayPettit From United Kingdom, joined May 2002, 608 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2577 times:
I quite agree that you have to be patient. Sometimes, a human being may enhance the picture. Is the a.net policy just designed to promote better pictures, or is there a degree of legal protection here too?
I've seen some real vintage shots (taken before even I was born) that feature people. Is this because of the rarity value or the likelihood that they're probably no longer with us I wonder.
Just been looking at a slide of an Ansett 727 (at Perth??) from 1969 taken by my dad, but I think the people are too distant, hopefully....