Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fuji Velvia Vs. Kodak E100VS  
User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1443 posts, RR: 40
Posted (14 years 5 days ago) and read 2950 times:

I would like to learn what do you think of these two films. Both are good and quite expensive (price about the same). Velvia is ISO 50 and E100VS, as the name itself says, ISO 100 film. Anyway, many says E100VS has even smaller grain than Velvia and that the E100VS has more saturated colours.

What is your opinion? Anyone else tried/using these films?

Jorgos Tsambikakis
Helsinki, Finland


Bula!
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDufo From Slovenia, joined May 1999, 787 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (14 years 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2723 times:

I have never tried E100VS film, but after reading quite some interesting info about it, I will certanly try it soon.

About Velvia.. I highly recommend that film if you can afford it and if you have photo equipment that can 'use' the film.

One example of Velvia is http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=46076

(if you want a higher res./better quality of this picture, tell me).

Jernej



I seriously think I just creamed my pants without any influence from any outside variables.
User currently offlineThomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3860 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2711 times:

I have been using Fujifilm almost exclusively for over 15 years now. I got tired of tring to find facility that could process Koadachrome in my area.

To your question, I use Velvia for 99% of my work (planes & eveything else !) , occasionally I will use the higher speed Sensia (200) for other work. As for Kodak's EV100VS .. well I have not had a chance to use it, and to be honest I'am a little weary of Kodak's E-6 films, although I have not used any since 1985 ! Velvia is still not the best for flesh tones, but that is rather moot point here, since most of us are shooting planes, not people. 95% of my work on this board is shot with Velvia. Go to the home page and type in Thomas Millard to check out some of my work.

Thomas



"Show me the Braniffs"
User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1443 posts, RR: 40
Reply 3, posted (14 years 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2692 times:

I've also tried Velvia. It's good for nice shots only when there is no yellow spotlights.  

Take a look:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=69759



Bula!
User currently offlineNikonman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2689 times:

Do not use 100VS, it blows. If you're going to use a Fuji film use Provia F. It has the best saturation and grain (lack thereof) of any film on the market.



User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10360 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week ago) and read 2663 times:

Velvia has a too high contrast in my opinion, I´m mostly using Kodaks 100SW-slide-film.
Try that, it´s nice. I didn´t use the 100VS so far, but bought some films for test recently because my photo-dealer recommended it to me (he said it has also a very high contrast like Velvia, but its more "flexible" being 100 ASA and has a very fine grain/sharpness).


User currently offlineWidebodyphotog From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 917 posts, RR: 67
Reply 6, posted (13 years 11 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2654 times:

I have extensive experience with the fuji and kodak products myself and I have found them both to be very good films. Fuji Velvia 50 is highly saturated super fine grained film and is used to its fullest potential with fast pro lenses with tack-sharp optics. The same goes for kodak 100vs and you can still get premium results with lesser quality lenses. I think that in a 100 speed E6 film E100s is actually the best choice for aviation photography because it is less saturated and gives very sharp true-to-life colors. But for the ultimate in sharpness, true color representation, and archival keeping, the best choice are Kodak Kodachrome films. The 25 and 64 speed films are both super sharp and give the best color representation that I have seen. I have switched over all of my photography work to these films in the past year and have also been using Kodachrome 200, which can be pushed to ISO 800 if necessary. Now I know a lot of folks will object to Kodachrome on the grounds of availability of processing, and price, but K-14 prosessing is easily obtained with prepaid processing mailers. I understand the objections but the best and longest lasting images come from Kodachrome in mine and many others opinions, so if you are inclined to get the most out of your photography I think K14 is the best way to go.


-widebodyphotog



If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Need Advise About Fuji Velvia Or Provia. posted Sun Apr 16 2006 10:24:41 by Dutch122
Fuji Velvia 50 posted Mon Aug 16 2004 10:32:15 by KC7MMI
Fuji Velvia 100F Announced! posted Fri Mar 28 2003 19:16:51 by LGB Photos
Fuji S2 Vs Nikon D100 posted Fri Sep 27 2002 09:16:39 by Alaskaairlines
Fuji Velvia posted Fri Aug 10 2001 05:31:27 by Dazed767
Fuji Velvia posted Tue Jan 16 2001 02:22:07 by Usairways@clt
Fuji Velvia posted Mon Aug 21 2000 15:55:39 by Jasonm
Fuji Astia 100 Vs. 100F posted Wed Sep 22 2004 05:27:48 by KC7MMI
Kodak Or Fuji? posted Wed Apr 21 2004 15:17:01 by Planespotting
Fuji FinePix S602 Vs. Fuji FinePix 3800 posted Sat Jan 25 2003 01:43:21 by Jcs17