MDL_777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 267 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2323 times:
I'm looking to get a new camera very soon, and I'm leaning toward the Canon EOS Elan 7. Those of you Canon fans out there and those of you who own one or have owned one, would you recommend it? Is it reliable, any problems, service issues, etc.? Almost all of the customer reviews on Amazon.com were really positive. One thing I like about it is that it has an aluminum body, where cameras like the Nikon N65, N80 have plastic ones. I'm thinking of getting it with the 28-105 USM lense. I can always add other lenses later. Also, for those of you that have this feature, is it worth the extra $$ for the Eye Control feature?
JFKTOWERFAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2294 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW DATABASE EDITOR
I have the Elan 7e with the eye control, I have never used this feature just is one of those things to use as a selling point not very useful IMHO. I love the camera however. If you look in my profile you can see some pics I have taken with it also search for some of Wietse de Graaf's stuff he has quite a bit more than me. I use Provia 100F. It is a great camera for the price, however if I could start over again I would have waited and saved my money and bought a digital. By the time you by the camera then a slide scanner plus a bunch more other things you have spent enough money to buy a good digital. Obviously there are other things involved but I use mine mostly for aviation photography and for that I think the digital would have been the better choice. Hope this helps.
Craigy From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 1118 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2278 times:
I have the EOS 30 with eye control (without eye control it is the EOS 33).
I do not use the eye control for aircraft - I use the center focusing point. The eye control is great for stuff like wildlife (you must take the time to calibrate it properly) where you want a specific focus, i.e. the subject's eyes.
I considered digital - £2,200 D60 against £400 EOS30, and £680 for a Canon 4000 DPI film scanner. I worked out to break even with camera plus scanner, I would need to shoot 2 rolls of slide film every week for 3 years.
Yes, I have limited my ability to get shots on A.net (I used to use a Pro90 consumer digital and my scanning still leaves a lot to be desired), but nothing beats projecting slides onto a 5 foot screen in front of family and friends. Much better than crowding round a 17 inch monitor.
The D30 looked like the EOS30, but as a camera did not come close. The D60 is half way there, but the EOS 30 is still miles ahead in functionality.
The only thing I would change about this camera is the exposure compensation. It is in 1/2 stops. 1/3 would be so much better, given its tendancy to underexpose slightly. +1/2 is sometimes a tad too much.
AndrewAir From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 361 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months ago) and read 2245 times:
I have the EOS 7E. I have never really used the eye control. I regret getting the camera. With camera, lenses, and scanner the price came out the same as if I bought a Sony 707 with the b300. I would much rather of purchased the 707. All in all its just not worth it.