Serge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 2 Posted (12 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2288 times:
Okay.. I've been shooting prints for over 1 year now. Almost 100% of it being Kodak Gold 100 or 200. Up to this past Christmas I would use a flatbed to scan 4x6 prints but I received a negative scanner, so now I'm scanning the negatives. But heres the problem I recently encountered on some of my negatives that I never had a problem with on print scans:
(not the best photo, just a good example of the streaks)
It seems most apparent with darker pics- but on some it doesn't show up at all .. I did some searching on the forums and it seems as if this could be caused by poor developing? Is there any way to clean the negative to rid this problem? Or am I stuck with many "ruined" images that only have hope with the dodge/burn tools in PS?
I have been looking into slide films lately and shot off a roll of K64. No streaks at all, from the same scanner. Now I see why Mr. Pries loves K64 so much (consistant) .. Currently I have a roll of Velvia 50 in my camera- gonna try and limit it to ramp/low-action shots though since my lense isn't very fast! I'm just trying to experiment with some of the "good stuff" as I'm ready for a switch!
Serge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2166 times:
Nope, nothing like that. But the main way on my scanner to scan negatives is to run them through the batch feed system- the negative has to be flexed into a 90* right angle to go around the corner when scanned.
The negative feed is the deal on the right..
Do you think that might be a problem? As an experiment later on, I will scan all four photos on a neg strip through the batch scan, then I will cut the photos up into single frames and place them in the adapter in the front (mainly used for slides). Then I will compare and see if the photos are any different..
I hope I'm onto something, I'll be happy if its just my scanner (they can be replaced, most of the GA photos I have cannot )