Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
2x Teleconverter  
User currently offlinePaulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Posted (13 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2325 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have two question about 2x teleconverter the screw in type for my minolta dimage 7i.

How will the teleconverter affect light and picture quality

and Can I stack two together and how will stacking affect light and picture quality.

Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBoeingholiday From Austria, joined Apr 2002, 456 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (13 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2080 times:

A friend of mine has bought a teleconverter for his D-100 lens. Bad idea, the autofocus didn't work well, and the pictures were blurry and with low quality. That's what I know - haven't used one myself yet Big grin

User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (13 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2055 times:

Ahh but there's Teleconvertors and there's teleconvertors....

I have a cheapo Jessops 2x convertor for my Nikon SLR and yes the pictures are pretty poor. I suspect if I'd paid the several hundred pounds extra for a genuine Nikon teleconvertor the results would have been significantly better.

On the other hand, these are teleconvertors that sit between the camera body and the lens, whereas on the Digicams (i.e. non SLR) these teleconvertors sit on the front of the lens. Will that have an impact I wonder?

 Wink/being sarcastic

Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlinePlanedoctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 286 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1997 times:

Indeed there are 2 types of teleconverters. The SLR type is between camera and lens. They have drawbacks such as light loss as loss of sharpness. The type you put in front of your camera will have the same effect. The light loss will be harder to guage because there is no interface with the camera to tell the old versus new maximum aperture. You could know by setting Av to a determined value and see where your shutter speed sits before and after mounting the converter (pointing at the same light source throughout). The amount of sharpness lost varies with the quality of the teleconverter- but it will -never- be sharper than the naked lens! My experience with the AF with the front mount TC's shows that the AF is a little worse but I cannot quantify it for you at all.

Hope that helps a little.

User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 3163 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (13 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2000 times:

Well I use both types of tele-converters depending on the camera I am using.

I use a 2x auxillary lens, and also a fisheye and wide auxillary lenses on my Nikon CoolPix 950 and have had no problems at all. All three have had shots accepted here on A.net.

I also use a 2x on my SLR Nikon and again no problem. However there is a two-stop loss of light with the converter in place. It should be noted that if your prime lens is only a f:4.5 or so or a slow variable aperature lens, then the quality will suffer somewhat and the autofocus will most likely have problems due to the lower light levels reaching the AF sensors. My prime telephotos are all f:2.8 lenses so they work well, including autofocus with the extenders. This includes the 80-200mm f:2.8 and the 300mm f:2.8 lenses.

Perhaps why the quality stays good is that they are all Nikon converters and lenses. (no spam please) Big grin


User currently offlineCheshireCat From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1921 times:

I've had a problem using TC's on my 7i. The lens shows up in the picture! I zoom out all the way but I cant get rid of it all.  Angry Has anything like this happened to you?


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 813 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (13 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1901 times:

Steve - I'm sure Nikon convertors work just fine in their own way - but can you stack 'em like Canon's? Sorry, couldn't resist  Smile

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin K. Work



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (13 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1861 times:


That's the sort of photo I aspire to producing.... Once again, nice work Colin!

 Wink/being sarcastic


Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
2x Teleconverter posted Tue Oct 30 2001 11:31:05 by Lugonza_2001
Nikkor 70-300 VR And 1.4 Teleconverter posted Wed Jan 28 2009 06:12:00 by Alasdair1982
Cheap Teleconverter For Any Camera On Ebay? posted Tue Nov 25 2008 07:56:14 by Paulmcm
Is This 2x Exactly The Same Pic? posted Tue Sep 23 2008 15:15:18 by Birdwatching
2x Soft Rejections - How Soft? posted Wed Dec 5 2007 08:59:30 by McG1967
The Teleconverter Dilema posted Sun Nov 12 2006 16:38:32 by JetJock22
Need Info On A 2x Converter posted Tue Aug 22 2006 21:17:58 by EZYAirbus
Canon 70-200 F2.8 +2x Vs 100-400 posted Wed Nov 30 2005 23:42:06 by Donder10
Teleconverter Or Not posted Sat Oct 1 2005 12:11:39 by ManuCH
Which Teleconverter For The EOS 350D? posted Sat Aug 20 2005 18:28:38 by Steve88