Looks like a competive spec - but no mention of price. A big plus for this one is the enormous range of K-mount lenses available - both new and used, so could be a very good option for someone not yet committed to a system and with a tight budget.
FL350 From Belgium, joined Feb 2003, 517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1891 times:
Well there's more and more choice in the DSLR market, I was going for a D100 but well maybe I should wait...
But it's been a while I've been waiting don't know what to buy...
I've read a lot about all those DSLR and i'm getting confused...
PRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1870 times:
Ok thanks. Hypothetical question time: What current Pentax lenses would you favour to accompany this new DSLR, and what would their approximate cost be (Europe) if the body were available right now - I refer to av. photography of course
L-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29895 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1816 times:
I would offer a suggestion on this but I had just gotten my brand new Sigma 28-135 F3:5-5.6 MACRO when my PZ-70 imploded at the Elemdorf AFB last year. That was the first trip out for that lens. It seemed like it was going to be a good one.
Belive it or not, the only lenses I have bought since then have been Takumar Universal mounts that fit on my Spotmatic and my Zenit B.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
Avroarrow From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 1045 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1799 times:
That is a plus, I'm a big fan of standard AA rechargeables. Cheaper and always available. They seem to last OK too if you get the high capacity NIMH ones. I just dropped the cash wad on a new Fuji, but if I hadn't this Pentax would have been a nice option too.
Give me a mile of road and I can take you a mile. Give me a mile of runway and I can show you the world.