Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Please Help With Some Rejections.  
User currently offlineSokol From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 284 posts, RR: 3
Posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3483 times:

Hello all,

Please help me with these rejections.

1. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=FedEx_DC-10-30.jpg (Badmotiv)

2. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=N605FE_Nose.jpg (Badscan) What do you think for my favorite shot in January ?

3. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=B-16106.jpg (Badscan)

4. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=KOREANAIR.jpg (Badscan)

5. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=B-18703_CARGO.jpg (Badmotiv)

6. http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=EVA_Tail.jpg (Badmotiv)


Please try do your best Thanks.  Smile

-Sokol



4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3469 times:

Sokol,
I tend to agree.
1-Wheels cut off
2-Could use a little more room on the nose.
3-a little grainy and not quite sharp?
4-Great shot, but still grainy and not sharp
5-My favorite of the bunch, don't like the car on the right though
6-angle is not great, maybe if you had moved aft some more to bring the winglet closer to the tail in the frame, and eliminated that van.

Jeff


User currently offlineFUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3389 times:

Sokol,

#1: The cut-off wheels really kill the picture
#2: I can't see any "badscan", however I would agree with a "badmotiv" rejection
#3: quite an amount of grain, not sharp
#4: quite grainy, not sharp
#5: the bad weather and the vehicles disturb the picture
#6: unusual angle, would have had more chances in sunny conditions

Sorry, but I don't think that any of the photos above can be fixed. But you've already got some great shots in the database!


Frank
FU Airliner Photography



Frank Unterspann - Hamburg, Germany
User currently offlineSokol From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 284 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3338 times:

Hi,

So what should I do with #2, #4, and #5 to look better and add on A.net ?
And is there any other one can be better to add on A.net ?


-Sokol  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
http://www.geocities.com/sokol_86/aviations.html


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9668 posts, RR: 68
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3339 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Sokol - All the shots, save for the China 747, appear unsharp and blurry. How come the desperation to get these shots into the database? They are nothing compared to some of the shots you have had accepted to the database.

Don't lower your standards just to get more shots on Airliners.

Think quality, not quantity.

Royal


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help With Some Rejections posted Fri Feb 3 2006 23:35:30 by Avro85
Little Help With Some Rejections posted Wed Apr 21 2004 00:10:28 by ChrisThurtell
Help With Some Rejections posted Fri May 30 2003 14:20:50 by Airbus Lover
Help With Some Rejections posted Tue Feb 11 2003 08:35:17 by An-225
Help With Some Rejections posted Mon Jan 27 2003 08:38:08 by Je89_w
A Little Help With Some Rejections... posted Sun May 26 2002 02:19:11 by Serge
Please Help Me With Some Rejections! posted Thu May 15 2003 21:57:55 by 747 4-ever
Need Some Help With Badquality Rejections posted Thu Jun 2 2005 04:21:12 by JohnP
Need Help With Some Shots Please... Thanks! posted Tue Apr 5 2005 20:58:08 by Glapira
Help With Some Rejects Please posted Sat Mar 5 2005 11:11:48 by SA006