JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3596 times:
I tend to agree.
1-Wheels cut off
2-Could use a little more room on the nose.
3-a little grainy and not quite sharp?
4-Great shot, but still grainy and not sharp
5-My favorite of the bunch, don't like the car on the right though
6-angle is not great, maybe if you had moved aft some more to bring the winglet closer to the tail in the frame, and eliminated that van.
FUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3516 times:
#1: The cut-off wheels really kill the picture #2: I can't see any "badscan", however I would agree with a "badmotiv" rejection #3: quite an amount of grain, not sharp #4: quite grainy, not sharp #5: the bad weather and the vehicles disturb the picture #6: unusual angle, would have had more chances in sunny conditions
Sorry, but I don't think that any of the photos above can be fixed. But you've already got some great shots in the database!
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9696 posts, RR: 67
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3466 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Sokol - All the shots, save for the China 747, appear unsharp and blurry. How come the desperation to get these shots into the database? They are nothing compared to some of the shots you have had accepted to the database.
Don't lower your standards just to get more shots on Airliners.