Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How To Improve This?  
User currently offlineRol From Germany, joined Feb 2000, 76 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 7 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3558 times:

Fellow photographers!

My last upload was "without warning" and now this rejection because of low quality. Is it a dirty scan? (one of the reject reasons).

Kodak 100 Asa slide, scanned with 2820 dpi, Minolta dimage scan dual II, Nikon F 80, Sigma 80 - 300 AF 1:4-5,6, APO Macro Super; Speed 1/350 Sec.

Thanks for any comment
Roland


http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=hlf739-2.jpg

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3515 times:

Hey,

What apperture was this? I see severe vignetting around the corners. When using cheap(er) lenses like sigma's you need to stop down a bit when shooting to prevent vignetting (dark corners). Try apperture priority at f6.7 or f8.

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineApuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3500 times:

Hmm, I can see more than one reason why this shot has been rejected:

- some grain
- dark edges around the corners (happens quite often with certain lenses AFAIK)
- some overexposure on the engine pod (in fact, it looks quite green to me)
- if you look at the edges of the airline's name 'Hapag Lloyd', the transition from red to blue isn't quite as should be. --> bad jpg compression?

Hope this helps,
Ivan



Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3509 times:

Bit of falloff around the edges. Did you have a hood on the lens? Most don't work well (even the ones that ship with the lens).
Bit of noise, shouldn't be a problem but on this site it is.
Seems a bit oversaturated too, at least compared to what the screeners like.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineOla From Finland, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 84 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3456 times:

If you have Photoshop you can try to lighten those dark corners with Dodge tool. I don't know if that helps to get it uploaded, maybe, maybe not...

Nice shot by the way!  Smile


User currently offlineFUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 18 hours ago) and read 3384 times:

Wietse wrote: "When using cheap(er) lenses like sigma's you need to stop down a bit when shooting to prevent vignetting (dark corners)."

This occasionally happens with more expensive lenses, too. Remember Sam's problems? And Sigmas are not always "cheap" lenses, they also produce quality f2.8 glass. As Wietse said correctly, I would never use an aperture of f5.6 with your lens. Start at f6.7 or f8. I would also recommend to use a lower shutter speed. For landing and take-off shots 1/180 of a second is sufficient.

Btw, another rejection reason would be "badinfo". Hapag-Lloyd doesn't own any Boeing 737-900, they only operate -800.


Frank
FU Airliner Photography



Frank Unterspann - Hamburg, Germany
User currently offlineRol From Germany, joined Feb 2000, 76 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3357 times:

Thanks for your replys.

Wietse, Frank:
Yes, it was f 5,6. That's obviously the reason for the vignetting in the corners. And Frank, you are right: The lens is not a bad lens, it is for example better than the lowest Nikkor series (G-Nikkor I think). I have the same effect with my 28-105 D-Nikkor at f 3,5.
Of course it is a B 737-800!

Today I made a print of the shot on my desk jet in 20x30 cm with high resolution. No grain, no noise, even the "Boeing 737-800" on the fuselage is clear and sharp legible. So you could think another reason for the rejection is the difficulty to scan and process an analog photo compared to a digital.

..and I only wanted to upload a photo from my home airport  Sad

Regards
Roland


User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3323 times:

Frank,

I recall Sam's 80-400 and the remarks regarding that story; that it should not be like that on a pro lens. In general, you should always step down, to prevent vignetting, but also to prevent a too shallow DOF..

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help Needed. How To Improve This Pic posted Fri Sep 17 2004 03:45:50 by ManBurkert
How To Improve This Very Rare Photo? posted Sat Sep 11 2004 22:31:48 by Blackhawk144
Any Comments As To How To Improve This Shot? posted Sun Jun 13 2004 04:43:31 by Je89_w
How To Improve This? posted Sun Mar 30 2003 14:37:12 by Rol
How To Improve This Photo? posted Sun Oct 20 2002 16:23:56 by Mirage
Any Idea On How To Improve This posted Wed Aug 7 2002 09:57:28 by 707cmf
Any Suggestions On How To Improve This? posted Fri Jun 21 2002 23:36:13 by EGGD
How To Improve This Photograph posted Fri Jan 4 2002 11:14:04 by Sydneybuses
Rejection - How Can I Improve This Image? posted Fri Sep 29 2006 10:12:57 by Linco22
How To Improve Photo posted Sun Jul 9 2006 17:53:29 by McG1967