Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Angle Of Camera Compared To Horizon?  
User currently offlineLN-OJB From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 39 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 8 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2586 times:

Hello there!
I have just had a shot rejected with these words:
"The angle of the camera does not seem to be straight compared
to the horizon. In the future, make sure you always hold the
camera absolutely level. This particularly applies to pictures
of aircraft on the ground. For shots of aircraft in flight where
the ground is visible (take-offs and landings in particular),
the general rule is that the camera should be level with the
horizon and the aircraft be at an angle. There may be
exceptions to this rule if the composition of the picture is
unique and having a level horizon would detract from the
aesthetic value of the picture (such cases will be rare)."

Now I don´t complain, and I am fully aware of the need of sorting out shots among the large amount uploaded.

But I feel the rejection messages sometimes are a bit too general.
http://www1.airpics.com/showimg.php?imgid=37904

This is the photo concerned. My first sight of a KLM B737 repainted, taken as the aircraft are coming in to gate 21 at Flesland airport, Bergen, Norway in the morning April 3rd. I was placed at the top of a nearby carpark, 3rd level, looking down at the aircraft parking at the nearest gate, with a fence in front, with the end of the apron against the trees behind, and with the runway, the sea and the horizon as background.

Now, how is the photo to be judged in level?
I concentrated on holding the camera in level with runway and horizon behind.
As a matter of fact, a small church tower is vertical in the far background. As the aircraft is seen in a small angle coming from the left side after a left turn, it is easily judged out of level. But measured both to the wheels and to the top of fuselage, I assumed the photo to be level enough. Specially set against background. The photo has not been cropped from original slide, nor has it been rotated.

Another interesting thing, is that the runway at Flesland itself, hardly can be a measure of a runway in level...... But the horizon and the sea is.

What do you think? Anyway it was a nice place for beautiful morning views  Smile
Kind regards Ole Johan Beck

[Edited 2003-04-28 22:21:06]

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2570 times:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/aviation_photography/read.main/76567/6/

Ben Pritchard


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2525 times:

The tower in the center background is a dead giveaway. As you can see, it is clearly tilting a few degrees to the left.

At first glance, the shot looks "right-side high". But we generally only reject for badangle only if we can confirm that first impression with a reference, such as light poles, horizons, etc. Correcting for angle is about the easiest thing in the world, (unlike, say, use of the unsharp mask or color shifting), so there should be little excuse not to get it more or less right.

Charles


User currently offlineLN-OJB From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2476 times:

Thank you, both Ben and Charles!

I don´t have Photoshop 7.0, but it seems to be a good investment....

I quite agree that tilting photos is about the easiest thing to do! I have to admit (and I know it sounds stupid), that I really haven´t noticed the tower in center background which was called "a dead giveaway".
I have now tilted the shot 0,8 degrees clockwise, and it has started a new approach to reach the database.....

To conclude, I agree that this is a good forum for learning....

Ole Johan


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Angle Of The Camera posted Fri Jul 19 2002 21:58:28 by Lanpie
Not Straight Compared To The Horizon? posted Tue Mar 19 2002 20:25:45 by Patroni
What Kind Of Camera To Buy. posted Wed Jan 30 2002 19:10:26 by Jer32382
Batteries Of The Future To Charge In Seconds? posted Sun Jun 11 2006 21:32:21 by 9VSPO
Wind Blows Dust In Camera / Guide To Clean posted Wed May 24 2006 11:14:31 by Guido
Brand's Of CDR's Used To Back-up Your Photos posted Wed Mar 9 2005 19:43:22 by LGW
Agfa Slide Film, Compared To Fuji posted Sun Oct 3 2004 22:09:54 by Lugonza_2001
I Think My Camera Need To Be Cleaned But How? posted Thu Jun 10 2004 15:47:03 by Dcrusafon
New Camera: Which To Choose? posted Sat Mar 13 2004 10:43:23 by MAS A330
Is A Digital Camera Needed To Upload To A.net? posted Sun Feb 29 2004 09:19:13 by ACB777