Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 54 Posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 882 times:
A couple of spots on it I know, but, by far, this is my best scan yet.....
USAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 994 posts, RR: 11 Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 808 times:
HEY! I never gave you permission to photograph me
I would say it might. The plane IS a bit far away, that might get it kicked back. If the plane was filling the frame it would more than likely make it.
Regards,
C. Wassell
-Cullen Wassell @ MSL | Pentax *istDL, Sigma 28-80 AL DG Macro II, Sigma 70-300 DG Macro
Thom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11922 posts, RR: 52 Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 794 times:
I agree with USAIR_757, the plane is a little far away, but it could still be accepted. Also, if you have the opertunety, try to remove the dust/spots in the sky.
Otherwise, a very nice picture.
Regards
Thom@s
"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
BA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11097 posts, RR: 68 Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 779 times:
I think it might make it. However, as USAir_757 said, its s bit far. Try scanning it at a higher DPI, then cropping around it. That should keep the same quality, and make it look like it was a close shot. Also, as Thom@s said, you might want to remove those dust/spots in the sky.
Other then that, its a great picture!
Good luck!
Kind regards.
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, 
From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11922 posts, 
From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5524 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
