Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Big Cleanup In The Database?  
User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Posted (11 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 3050 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I noticed the number of photos in the database today vs yesterday has decreased by some 900 (and the total views going down by 250,000).
Have older photos been removed or have some photographers left the site...?

Konstantin


Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8766 posts, RR: 42
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 3027 times:

At least one said he was leaving and taking his photos with him due to the recent non-av forum developments... Pretty weird.


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 769 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2995 times:

Sadly Tom Hildreth (TomH) has decided to leave A.net - from discussions with him, I understand that this was not simply due to a particular issue or problem (not that he doesn't have issues with A.net - who doesn't?!) - but after due consideration, he finds the service provided by A.net does not map particularly well to his interests, requirements and resources.

I for one will miss his contributions both in the databse and the forums, but respect the fact that he seems to have given his decision considerable thought. As one of his concerns is image misuse/piracy I can understand why he would want to withdraw his images rather than simply stop uploading.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineJoe pries From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1957 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2951 times:

the illegal use of our photos is becoming more of a problem. I too get more worried each day and get emails every so often alerting me to illegal corporate usage of my photos.

Joe A.T. TEAM


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2936 times:

Its sad, but you know what they say, another one bites the dust.

~Dan


User currently offlineJetTrader From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 586 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2903 times:


For what it's worth I'd rather upload here and get shots used and/or abused than upload somewhere else where no one will ever see my shots.

My "bought and paid for" uses far outweigh any illegal uses and a real advantage of uploading here is knowing you guys are all out there looking out for me and each other. I am increasingly reassured that fewer and fewer abusers will get away with it because someone who uses this site will spot a shot and bring it to our attention. I reckon if we stick together we get stronger...

United we stand, divided we fall and all that!

Cheers,
Dean



Life's dangerous. Get a f**king helmet!
User currently offlineLindy field From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 3131 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2898 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Man, that's really a shame. Tom had a lot of excellent oldie shots from the northeast and a lot of interesting black & white photos. I'm looking at the selection of photos from Hartford Bradley in the database--now it's down to just five photos from the 1970s. I understand his concerns, but this stinks! I wish I'd saved more of his images...

We'll miss you, Tom!


User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2884 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The good thing is I don't really know the extent of illegal use.
I just hope it isn't too much. But like Dean says, the actual deals outweigh this concern for me for the time being.

Konstantin



Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
User currently offlineJoe pries From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1957 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2879 times:

you guys are right overall the legal usage outweighs the illegal, still it can be frustrating at times.

Joe AT TEAM


User currently offline737heavy From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 601 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2860 times:

Dumb question, but is there no way the 'right click save as' could be logged? I know there are probably loads of ways around it and other ways of getting the images but at present there seems to be nothing but complaints. And surely something would be preferable to nothing.

Regards

[Edited 2003-05-22 16:23:52]

User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 769 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2799 times:

Please note that I said

one of his concerns is image misuse/piracy

I don't want him thinking he has been misrepresented - it was not that alone that made Tom decide to leave.

My "bought and paid for" uses far outweigh any illegal uses

... or at least, so you believe  Smile ... but yes, I'm inclined to agree that for me the benefits outweigh the risks ... I could keep all my images safe by letting no one see them, but where does that get me. I consider letting my pics out in the wild as a sort of loss-leader.

But situations vary ... I consider few of my images rare in any way - I can always go out and take more - they have no special market value. Genuinely rare/historical images are a slightly different matter as part of their value is simply lack of availablity - by placing such an image on A.net allowing for possible copying around the 'net would lower the market value of that image.

Cheers,

Colin






Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineSdjminton From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 122 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2737 times:

>>Dumb question, but is there no way the 'right click save as' could be logged?

Not a dumb question, you can disable the right click function using Javascript, however you cannot log the save as behaviour.

The main problem is that by opening a picture you are storing it on your hard drive in the internet temporary cache.

I am working on a solution for a media house at the moment, utilising Flash to prevent saving of images. The problems with this are - there is nothing to stop someone taking a screenshot, and secondly, users need to have the Flash plugin.

Steve.


User currently offlineRayPettit From United Kingdom, joined May 2002, 608 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2693 times:

... or at least, so you believe ... but yes, I'm inclined to agree that for me the benefits outweigh the risks ... I could keep all my images safe by letting no one see them, but where does that get me. I consider letting my pics out in the wild as a sort of loss-leader.

I woldn't say loss leader, as I don't intend to sell them. You might have a slide night with your friends and your slide may be shared by no more than a dozen people, but this way several hundred or even thousands can see the fruits of your experience.

Original slides of older subjects are surely over priced, and I don't altogether understand the prices you have to pay top quality shots of comtemporary subjects either, as our hobby must primarily be about joy, not money.

Anyway, I'm sorry to see Tom and his images go. Lets hope that one day technology will find a way of securing his work, so it can be appreciated on some site or other.


User currently offlineJoe pries From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1957 posts, RR: 53
Reply 13, posted (11 years 7 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2681 times:

Ray,
like any original art form, there are always people willing to pay good money for original art- original aircraft slides are no different than original ansel adams, renoir, bach, beethoven, etc etc. (except prices paid/demanded). All art has a monetary value to someone out there. You can rest assured that as the years go by the over-priced older slides will continue to be more and more overpriced, and you can additionally rest assured that there will be people who will pay those prices.

Joe A.T. TEAM
=========================================================
Original slides of older subjects are surely over priced, and I don't altogether understand the prices you have to pay top quality shots of comtemporary subjects either, as our hobby must primarily be about joy, not money.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Most Photographed Aircraft In The Database posted Mon Apr 10 2006 22:58:40 by Pennyjack
My First Photo In The Database! posted Mon Feb 13 2006 04:34:27 by Thetford569
Picture Twice In The Database posted Mon Jul 18 2005 13:34:49 by PipoA380
50 Photo's In The Database posted Thu Nov 18 2004 13:23:24 by Southpaw8669
Photo Of Boeing Wedgetail In The Database posted Wed May 19 2004 19:01:44 by Bronko
In The Queue But Not In The Database.... posted Tue Feb 17 2004 18:56:38 by Gmonney
A.net History: 1st Digital Photo In The Database posted Sun Feb 8 2004 23:36:45 by TS
I've Finally Reached 100 Photos In The Database... posted Fri Oct 31 2003 13:01:46 by EGGD
What's The Most-Viewed Photo In The Database? posted Tue Sep 9 2003 23:29:34 by N670UW
Hooray, My 300th Pic In The Database posted Wed Aug 13 2003 18:00:55 by 707cmf