Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
10D Noise  
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 745 posts, RR: 16
Posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1479 times:

Folks, last night I made a big mistake ... showed up at a church to shoot a confirmation ceremony. Shortly before the start I realised I'd left my card reader for my laptop and one of my CF cards at home. DOH!

Dilemna - shooting RAW, I only had cards for 120 shots (and 36 families to cover). Do I delay the cermony by 30 minutes, dash home and get the missing kit, or shoot jpg?

Well, not wanting to look "unprofessional" I decided to carry on as if there was no problem and shoot jpg (as it turned out, I shot 250 frames).

This was the first time I'd really used jpg to any extent, so I was a bit worried. The good news for me is the shots are fine, however, comparing them to RAW shots in similar situations (mixed lighting, flash, ISO 100) there is no doubt that the .jpgs show more noise than processed RAW files, particuarly in shadows and detail areas like hair. Nothing to be alarmed about, but it certainly proved to me that there is a qualitative advantage in shooting RAW.

Cheers,

Colin


Colin K. Work, Pixstel
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1412 times:

Interesting to hear.

One thing I have always wondered about RAW. If I shoot RAW and the either Zoombrowser messes up or I need to format my PC etc and I have copies of my RAW images on CD what do I do then? Can I add the images from a CD back to Zoombrowser later when I need to and then convert them that way?]

Ben Pritchard


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 745 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1400 times:

Yea - the RAWs are your negatives - you can re-processes then from any source as & when you need to. But do yourself a favour - ditch Zoombrowser and use something else ... anything else ... Breezebrowser probably best value for money.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1357 times:

Hi Colin,

Is there a considerable speed loss in taking RAW?

Thanks

Glenn Stewart
Sydney, Australia



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 745 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1328 times:

Speed in what sense? As the files are larger, yes, they take longer to write to card, but there is no difference in speed up tothe point the buffer fills (ie. 9 shots RAW or jpg makes no difference, but writing the buffer takes longer when finished)

All other operations are identical, except of course with RAW you can change any camera settings later.

Processing obviously will take longer though.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offline737heavy From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 601 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1320 times:

On a different point Colin do you print your own work or send it to an online place? I've got a few photo's that I would normally print myself but I'm having all sorts of problems with them.

Regards

Lee


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 745 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1296 times:

Lee - I do both, depending on what is required, how much time I have etc. I use an Epson 890, and am pleased with the results when everything works, but colour management is a complete nightmare. Without investing serious money in proper colour management tools, close approximations are about the best you can hope for. However, sometimes I need a print for a client like NOW, so I have no choice, but I don't think I've ever had a print where all the colours were absolutely spot on. I am considering going shares on some calibration equipment with some work colleagues.

Given the luxury of time, I'm using Photobox more and more, and of course for everything over 8x10. and have seldom been disappointed - though I still think I can get a sharper image from my printer.

Cheers,

Colin




Colin K. Work, Pixstel
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
550EX On 10D, Possible? posted Thu Feb 22 2007 16:59:05 by WorldspotterPL
Upgrade From 10D To 30D? posted Mon Jan 1 2007 13:46:57 by Raptors
Canon 30D: More Noise Than Usual At Dark Blue Sky? posted Fri Nov 10 2006 23:01:22 by JetCrazy
10D & Microdrive Writing Speed posted Tue Oct 10 2006 14:00:22 by TS
Takeoff (color) Noise posted Wed Sep 27 2006 03:23:24 by Domokun
Noise Issue #2 posted Fri Jun 16 2006 23:32:29 by LGW
Grain/noise Reduction Question.... posted Mon Jun 5 2006 22:45:55 by Sirpug
High ISO Noise On DSLR's posted Sat Apr 22 2006 11:01:33 by LGW
10D V 20D At 1024 posted Wed Apr 12 2006 15:26:49 by BCal10
How To Reduce Noise On posted Wed Mar 29 2006 16:13:02 by AirMalta