Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejected. Help!  
User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=9M-MQE_MH_B734_21Jun03_PEN_DSC01522.jpg

badscan baddark badblurry badmotive  Sad

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=9M-MQE_MH_B734_21Jun03_PEN_DSC01528.jpg

badscan

Any help on improving it?

Note: rejected by screeners-in-training. Should I appeal or reupload improved ones? Thanks for advices and suggestions.

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePRM From Burkina Faso, joined Apr 2002, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days ago) and read 1536 times:

Should I appeal or reupload improved ones? Thanks for advices and suggestions.

If you can improve it, then always do so and re-upload rather than appealing  Smile

First one is not sharp - and it does look more like blur, the reflections in the glass are rather distracting, and it is quite dark.

The second one is also not sharp, and there's plenty of noise in the dark area around the rear part of the engine, and again it's pretty dark.

I'd not try again with these two if I was you - I think they are beyond salvation.

Paul


User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3508 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1505 times:

I would work on first one. Try make it sharper and brighter.
Perhaps a screener should comment on what is badmotive on that picture.

Daniel


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1477 times:

I too think that I could give it a try on the first one...

I have sharpened it a little and brightened it and might give it another try. I too do not understand badmotive in that first shot.

In fact I do not think it is blur but maybe just not sharp? Because from the big 5mp file i does not look blur at all, or am I wrong?


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1448 times:

One more guys!  Sad

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=9M-MRD_MH_B772_20Jun03_PEN_DSC01490.jpg


User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5490 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1412 times:

I played with the contrast (brightness +30 / contrast +8) then sharpened it.....big difference....don't know if it will make it or not.

User currently offlineVir380 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2002, 621 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1358 times:

Hi .... please all remember one thing when and if a picture is rejected dont take it the wrong way or personal ... if the picture is rejected it is not because we dont want it on here .. its because its not quite there and with a touch more work it will be there  Smile

To be honest the most rejections on here are because we know that the photographer in question can do better with manipulating the image.... most of the time it doesn't take much ... Sometimes it does ... but pretty much 60-70% of rejections can be improved.

With the above shots they as you are aware can be improved... as an idea look at the reject reasons and then look at the images again... that should really give you an idea of what to look at in the improvement , below is how i see it ( although i didnt screen the pics )

1: Dark , not much illumination on the instrument panel ... so with a bit of brightening and a touch more sharpening it should be fine.

2: Dark again , however there is not much motive in the shot ...a bit of a wrong angle , not much to focus on , again very soft .

To be honest i would work on number 1 as you should be able to do something with it.... but forget number 2 ... sorry

regards Tony


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1337 times:

Alrite, thanks! What about number 3 though?

User currently offlineVir380 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2002, 621 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1314 times:

Sorry cant open number 2 its gone  Sad
do you have any web space you can link to ?
id like to see it

Tony



User currently offlineJoakimE From Sweden, joined Nov 2001, 408 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1308 times:

It looks like the last one was appealed and can be seen here, http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/APPEAL_9M-MRD_MH_B772_20Jun03_PEN_DSC01490.jpg

User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1285 times:

Yup I appealed the 3rd one after asking many other photographers..

But any thoughts on improvments to the rejection?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Rejected. Help? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 21:01:05 by Christeljs
Rejected - Help! posted Fri Apr 8 2005 13:48:19 by Work4bmi
Rejected - Help Please posted Tue Jan 11 2005 16:14:20 by VIAF
My Photo Of WOA MD-11 Was Rejected - Help! posted Thu Apr 22 2004 02:14:25 by BDLGUY
Rejected. Help! posted Sun Jun 29 2003 09:22:53 by Airbus Lover
1 Shot Rejected. Help Needed. posted Mon Jun 23 2003 02:31:19 by N737MC
Why Some Of Them Was Rejected? Help posted Tue Nov 19 2002 05:57:07 by Sokol
Photo Rejected , Help As Soon As You Can posted Tue Sep 10 2002 05:34:38 by Sokol
23 Of 26 Photos Rejected...Help! posted Sat Jan 12 2002 14:44:02 by AUS_Spotter
These Were Rejected......help Please posted Sun Jul 8 2001 19:50:37 by Atco