Atp From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2003, 44 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4548 times:
I have been using a 5700 for about 10 months now, although it takes, what I think are good enough pictures, for me its a lot of hard work. The focus is very slow, if the conditions are not perfect, the images are very dark. If you are willing to be patient, and play around with it a lot, you will find it a pleasure.
I am about to put mine up for sale, and although I cant afford a dslr, I am going to opt for the Olympus e10 or e20.
Msh744 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 463 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4528 times:
Here are my thoughts on the CP5700 (I own one).
You may have trouble taking photos of fast moving objects due to the fact that AF is a little slow, but not too bad. I don't recommend it if your main purpose is taking photos of the Blue Angels and the like (or maybe I just need more practice). I currently have 20 photos on a.net, and all but my oldest 2 pics were taken with my CP5700. However, the quality of those CP5700 photos may not be the highest, as I have taken all of them through windows (airplane or airport windows). I have needed to adjust levels, etc in photoshop to make the photos have no tint, etc. I take all of my photos (so far) in Normal or Hi jpeg modes, so they may not be as good as RAW, TIFF, etc.
My CP5700 has worked fine for me, as I am usually taking photos of planes on the ground, or window views from planes. I hope this helped.
btw, when u came into London on May 11, I was leaving that afternoon from LHR.
Manzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4496 times:
Thanks very much Guys!
Mike... I had to go back to page 35 of Aisnaps Pics to find the Coolpix 5700 examples!
OK then, a bit slow on the ol' AF then eh?
Let's take another tack, aside from the Sony F717 what would you consider to be a competitor? I'm looking for good quality images and a decent zoom. Olympus 750UZ? Fuji S602? Canon Powershot G5?
I really like the look and feel of the F717 but am put off by the piddling (and proprietary) 128Mb memory sticks and only 5x zoom (190mm). I recall reading somewhere that it may accept the newer and larger Memory Stick Pro standard.
Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
Boieng747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4490 times:
I use the CP 5700 since November 2002. I find the camera is pretty good for someone who wants to advance, though it has limitations. If you are used to SLR cameras then forget about shooting several pictures of a plane landing, you can only manage one (possibly two in the best of cases). The camera also struggles a lot for autofocus in low light where it is very slow. I have also found out over time that the metering isn't very good when you shoot planes from a distance, creating overexposure. Otherwise the quality is good, the optics are very good just as well at 35mm as 280mm.
I suggest you also look at my pictures about 95% of them on A.net are done with that camera.