These photos have already been added to the database or you have
uploaded other photos that look very much like these. Please read more
on this issue in the Upload-FAQ.
Note: You could also get rejection message if there are photos very similar
to these that have passed the first screening and are waiting for the
second, final, screening. Also, generally if you submit a number shots of
an aircraft taken at the same time, only the best 1 or 2 will be selected
and rest may have been rejected as doubles. You can better control
which ones we accept by only uploading the 1 or 2 best shots from a
sequence of photographs of the same aircraft.
I have the following two photos allready added from this flight:
but hey:1st one is a take-off shot, the 2nd one is a inflight-shot, and the rejected one should have been the landing-shot I really dont see where this should be a baddouble or something like this, and i couldnt find a similiar photo on approach to rwy 28 .....
can anyone of the screener pls explain .........
robin
btw: the rejected photo was rejeted before, becuase i forgot to add the caterogy: "windowview"
Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1479 posts, RR: 18 Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1097 times:
the info box is actually wrong, dont know, why this is standing there ..... I wrote actually something like. short rwy 28 on our flight from CGN to ZRH at 20:25, overflying the city of Kloten.
Gerardo From Spain, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 3480 posts, RR: 34 Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1073 times:
Get used to it, Robin. I got one pic rejected, saying that I had a similar already uploaded or in the queue. Well, the only other picture of the same aircraft was a side on shot, while the rejected one was a nose shot....
COuld also be, that the screener hit a wrong button? This happened to me as well about 2 years back (Yep, I don't forget anything ).
My tip: make sure, every info given is correct, then make sure, the picture meats the A.net standards. If everything is OK, then appeal.
Cheers
Gerardo
dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
Skymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1069 times:
Seems reasonable rejection to me... The third picture doesn't really add much that can't be seen in the other two - unless you're desperately into flaps, and I'm sure we have other pics of deployed flaps on A320s.
Remember, this is airliners.net, not towns-from-the-air.net, and you've already got two pictures of that wing on the database - the third picture is the same wing again. As with all multiples, upload the best one or two, and keep the rest for yourself. More than two (max) and we pick the ones we think are best or if two are already on the database the new one goes - if you want to control which get in, be selective yourself.
Sponsor Message: 
From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1479 posts, 
I really dont see where this should be a baddouble or something like this, and i couldnt find a similiar photo on approach to rwy 28 .....
From Ghana, joined Apr 2002, 348 posts, 
From Spain, joined exactly 13 years ago today! 
, 3480 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
