Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2688 times:
EGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12426 posts, RR: 40 Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2670 times:
I don't think it is,
He's not saying, 'WOW LOOK HOW DIRTY THIS PLANE IS!', I think its ok to comment on whats in the photo, but trying to make them open it by asking them questions (you know, 'can you see all the planes?' 'can you see the bird behind it?' etc).
Because if you look at the floor, there's alot of crap down there, its not exactly what they normally look like when you take cabin shots (if you get on before, and the cabin is all in pristene condition etC).
Continental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5476 posts, RR: 21 Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2649 times:
Ryangooner From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 969 posts, RR: 25 Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2629 times:
personally i visit this site to see pictures of aircraft i would not normally be able to see, also i like to see some of the marvelous photographers that have some excellent shots posted on here.
i do not see the amazement in looking at the inside of a cabin.
what if i took a photo of the inside of a bus / coach , how many hits would that generate? same thing in my opinion.
i will be flying soon but i know i wont be taking a photo of the inside of the cabin at 35,000ft just to get pic of the century!!!
how many more of you share my opinion or how many of you disagree?
Cicadajet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2618 times:
ok, starting now... just to please everyone...
no blimps,
no helicopters,
no cabins,
no military,
no digital,
no boring ramp,
no Qantas,
no comments,
not too many in one day,
no "home" aircraft at hub airports,
no people,
no towers,
no gate shots,
no fuji,....
CPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5746 posts, RR: 4 Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2585 times:
Boeingholiday,
could you possibly tell me WHAT happened to the person at the of the right aisle? I can't help but wonder, because I jsut can't make out an face
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2552 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
how is that a cheap hit?
Trying hauling your ass up on the roof of your local airport. Maybe we'll get lucky and see you on CNN. Anyone can take an interior picture of an airplane, all you need is a ticket.
Am I over reacting? Maybe, but I'm not going to take shit from a punk who bad mouths the photogs of this site on other sites forums...
Serge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 3 Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2539 times:
I think the roof of Continental's airport (MSP) is the only way to get shots in the twin cities besides with a ticket and approach shots
Serge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 3 Reply 17, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2529 times:
This image may be fitting that description Andy - The best of both worlds!
Qantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5 Reply 19, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2528 times:
I appreciate what you say Ryan but here's a different perspective. Every airline publishes supposed in flight pictures of the cabin in an effort to persuade people to fly with them and what you see in the pictures is generally quite different from how it is in reality. I've seen BA's material for World Traveller and it looks great, lots of happy people with smiling kids etc but the reality is this:
N178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1626 posts, RR: 69 Reply 20, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2481 times:
I gonna agree with Royal that LTU shots seems to be a sort of cheap hits, however we all do it from time to time to boost our rating I guess. The photo put up by Matthew/Qantas744 is very decent cabin shot, thats what I prefer more. However as you know, shots involve with people even just their back draws interest to the large base of viewers here. It is a great way to get hits.(I did it 1-2 times too!)
Tom
I think I live close to your list in some way
no blimps, NEVER
no helicopters, NEVER
no cabins, A FEW INTERESTING ONE
no military, ONE ONLY SO FAR, MORE TO COME
no digital, FAILED
no boring ramp, FAILED SOMETIMES
no Qantas, I HAVE FEW ONLY FROM WHERE I LIVE
no comments, FAILED
not too many in one day, OK
no "home" aircraft at hub airports, I DO WELL ON THAT
no people, OK
no towers, OK
no gate shots, NEVER BECAUSE IT IS CLUTTERED
no fuji,.... COMPLETELY FAILED
Final thought: Bring on more just airplane shots!!
Sam
Continental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5476 posts, RR: 21 Reply 21, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 2444 times:
how is that a cheap hit?
Here, here, let me show you!
Check out the look on the pilots face
Implying that you must click on the photo to see what's going on. Cheap hit.
Trying hauling your ass up on the roof of your local airport.
Naaah, I'm not THAT stupid.
Am I over reacting? Maybe, but I'm not going to take shit from a punk who bad mouths the photogs of this site on other sites forums...
That was months ago buddy, get over it. Yes, you are overreacting.
Sabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 24, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2382 times:
This is not too Mirrodie but more to Royal...
Aren't some people taking the pictures at a.net too serious?
Is it soo important maybe to have more hits than another, to reach the one million hits status faster than another?
Sigh...
I don't see why the cabin shot goes more about cheap hits, than the DL B763 picture that Continental posted...
Not that I have something against the caption of the DL B763, but the same goes for the LT A330.
25 N178UA: Markus Didn't have anything to against you at all. But down to personal preference, I prefer a clean cabin shot like Matthew Qantas 744 posted those h
26 Boeingholiday: Sam, that's what I think too. It's a forced popularity, and I even don't find the shot too good myself. Fact is that people look at it and have fun. I
27 Clickhappy: Aren't some people taking the pictures at a.net too serious? Is it soo important maybe to have more hits than another, to reach the one million hits s
28 NonRevKing: I guess cheap hit just an expression, looking at the hits no. goes skyhigh and if the picture is not clearly an airplane, like bunch of hooter girls o
29 Sabena 690: I could care less how many views or shots I have here. Sounds a bit untrue to me, once you have reached a status as top photographer (which you are),
30 Exitrow: If there's something noteworthy in the image that cannot be seen in the thumbnail, I mention it in the remarks. Otherwise, it will probably be missed.
31 Clickhappy: sure, I care about the pictures, or I wouldn't post them. What I don't care about is how many I have, or how popular they are. Also, Markus and I have
32 Wietse: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/153_5350.jpg So this would constitute a breach of the "cheap hits" rule? (I didnt make a comment about th
35 N178UA: Brian/Sabena690 Not direct saying at you, just using Hooter girls as an example. I have cheap hits in the data base too, although some I would argue i
37 Cicadajet: Yes, Luis...another gem. I would have missed it; you're right, easy to lose in the thumbnail. Tom
38 Bigphilnyc: I dont believe when many of you say that you dont care about hits. When some of you folks are at the professional level and make money from your pics,
39 Exitrow: Luis, Your sunset shot is a perfect example of what I am talking about. I might have missed that judging only from the thumbnail. Regards, William[Edi
40 Clickhappy: When some of you folks are at the professional level and make money from your pics, views are what gets you sales. Websites wil often pay marketing fi
41 NonRevKing: Views aren't what get you sales. Good quality shots of interesting subjects are what generate sales. Agreed 100%. I haven't made jack on any of my mos
42 Bigphilnyc: Valid, but exposure is so important as well, isn't it? You can have the greatest stuff in the world, and if no one looks, then it doesn't mean as much
43 Exitrow: Phil, Of course exposure is nice. I just don't judge myself as a photographer based on hits. (For reasons I described above.) I like having my shots h
44 Bigphilnyc: I'm not saiyng it's all about views. Of course it isn't. I think you folks are overegaxerrating my point, and i'm jsut too tired to elaborate furhter,
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7421 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12426 posts, 
From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, 
From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5746 posts, 
From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3120 posts, 
From Austria, joined Apr 2002, 456 posts, 
From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1626 posts, 
From UK - Wales, joined Sep 2001, 2201 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
