Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
PLEase Calm My Digi Fears.  
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1831 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have a Canon Rebel 2000 but I am considering selling the body and buying a Canon Digital body now. (the lenses are interchangeable right?)

Why? Well, I like that you guys get instant feedback on your work with a digi......But I think that is the only reason why I want a digi.

.... I am not sure I would like to have to get a printer of certain quality, buy special paper, etc ...doesn't it get costly? I mean, I understand the cost if you are a photographer who may sell your work. But what if you are merely an amateur?

On the other hand, I shoot my prints and have albums full of stuff. When I want to show images to family and friends, I show them albums.

I was at the fiancees house, looking at her old albums, thinking, how can one ever get rid of albums. Just seems weird to me, ya know?

add to tmy "problems" that I have to geta scanner and upload my old pics anyway. ....

what would you suggest??

I am thinking of one day getting the scanner, uploading the old stuff, then just going digi.

What are the pros/cons of each?



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAvroArrow From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 1045 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

Since you asked, here is my 2 cents, but since its Canadian I guess its more like 1 cent to you, but anyway.....  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Keep your film body and go digital too, especially if you like the film body and are used to working with it.
Aside from the instant feedback from digital you can also do up prints of only the ones you want so really the processing costs are much less in the long term.
In my opinion I wouldn't bother with any at home inkjet printing of your pics just yet either. The quality isn't quite what you'd get from getting the digital image processed onto photopaper and the at home jobbies will fade out after 10 years. This won't always be the case, but for now I believe it is.
For showing off your digital pics, get a DVD player that can do JPEG/photo CDs. The cheap ones are so cheap now its unbelievable and you can whip up a slideshow in minutes burn it to a disc and sit around the TV in the living room and show your friends that way.
Just my opinion though.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



Give me a mile of road and I can take you a mile. Give me a mile of runway and I can show you the world.
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5498 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

I am not sure I would like to have to get a printer of certain quality, buy special paper, etc ...doesn't it get costly? I mean, I understand the cost if you are a photographer who may sell your work. But what if you are merely an amateur?

A good alternative is going to Wal-Mart and just popping in the Compact flash into the computer and priting out what you want....what size and how ever many. It's about .29 cents per 4x6, $1.40 per 5x7 etc. With my D30, the quality looks equal to print film, and I'm not kidding. Downfall is they can only print on matte finish, but most of the time I print out stuff other than aviation photography.

I shot around at a recent family wedding in PHL, I was VERY impressed how they came out.


User currently offlineKereru From New Zealand, joined Jun 2003, 873 posts, RR: 45
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1794 times:

Mirrodie,

Digital is good for getting feedback on your photos almost instantly. You can make digital albums with various programs that are available for a modest sum. One you might like to check is

http://www.flipalbum.com/

Instead of a scanner what about a slide copier attachment which you can use negative film in or just use the close up function of your lens attached to a digital body? At least its worth a try before investing in the scanner as you may not use it once all your existing photos are digitised.

Something to think about?  Smokin cool

Colin



Good things take Time.
User currently offlinePilothighflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1766 times:

I second AvroArrow
Keep both and enjoy both, film has its advantages, but digital is where everything is heading.


User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5055 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1726 times:

Hey Mirrodie,

I was in exactly the same situation! I had the European version of the Canon Rebel 2000 (the EOS 300 I think) and I went from that to the D30. Yes the lenses are interchangeable, and I sold the body only to someone for $150 USD. I do like the instant feedback, i actually believe it helps me to be a better photographer because i can see what I did wrong right then, and take another shot with different settings, and try things & experiment.

You can buy photo printers cheap - it all you are going to do with it is put the print into an album to show friends. or you can buy a more expensive printer to make prints that you can sell, or just take those images on a CD to your local photo store and have them print it if you are going to sell it. I purchased an inexpensive printer.

bruce



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

Hi Mirrodie,

I recommend the Canon 10D whole heartedly. One question though.... what lenses do you have in your collection?

I recommend you hire a Canon 10D and spend the weekend shooting shots as you normally would. The Canon 10D is excellent, but results differ greatly with lenses and ability to Photoshop the image.

Here is an example of one of my more recent shots from the 10D - you won't be dissapointed:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Glenn Stewart



Glenn Stewart



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 739 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

Keep both? OK, safe option, and that's what I did at first. When I got my D60, I kept an EOS3 for a full year, just in case. Guess how many rolls of film I shot. None.

Print costs are a consideration - depends what size you want, but if you use something like www.photobox.co.uk, and batch up your orders, costs are negligable for the smaller sizes.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1652 times:

I only use my photo printer to "proof" my shots, etc. If you want to have normal prints, pick out the ones you like, put them on a card or cd and take them to Sam's Club or Costco. 19cents each for 4x6 prints out of their Fuji Frontier machine in less then an hour. Outstanding quality on real photo paper. They also do 5x7, and 8x10. I think the 8x10's are like $1.89.

Jeff


User currently offlineAAGOLD From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 546 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1629 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Mirrodie

Go Digi and you won't regret it. Most have given you the reasons and they're all pretty good ... instant feedback, actual photo prints of only the good ones, much reduced cost with no film and processing to pay for and ease of getting them into the digital world (when compared to scanning).

I would add only one thing. Getting a good printer and printing them yourself is not a great idea unless you intend to make and sell larger prints. I have the Canon (yes, I almost choke on that being a Nikon man, but Nikon doesn't make printers) S9000 bubble jet and it makes stunning prints that would rival photo shop quality. Ask BigPhil he was gawking at some of them yesterday. But it's not cheap. For me to print a 4 x 6 it's about twice the cost of what everyone else says about going to Sam's Club and getting prints. But for the larger 13 x 19 size it's much cheaper and the best part is I have total control over the print. How many times have you gotten shoddy prints back from the photofinisher?

Another advantage. Compared to albums, which are nice but you can't carry them with you, I can carry thousands of pictures with me and I do wherever I go. It's nice.

Art


User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1590 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thank you all. You are all gentlemen and scholars. and I truly mean that.

Glenn, I have a 28-80 and 80-200, but also may want to get one of those image stabilizing lenses at well, in perhaps a higher focal length. Suggestions anyone?

As I will soon be flying in a few REAL flight sims, I think i may soon be making a purchase of sorts.  Big grin

I usually get camera bodies at B+H in Manhattan. ANy other good cost effective options/ideas?

I appreciate your knowledge.

mario



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 739 posts, RR: 16
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

one of those image stabilizing lenses at well, in perhaps a higher focal length

Consider the 300mm f4L IS - possibly the best lens Canon has produced. More than a few photographers prefer it to the legendary 300 f2.8 as the loss of a stop is easily made up for by the IS, and it is much lighter and more manageable.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 22 hours ago) and read 1529 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

THank you Colin.

Now for my next trick, er. um, question.....

What a good Canon starter DLSR body that is relatively inexpensive?




Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Please Rate My New 300D Set Up posted Mon Dec 13 2004 05:37:00 by Ua777222
Please Critique My Photos. posted Sat Feb 9 2002 23:08:06 by N737MC
My First Photo Usage Request, Help Please! posted Mon Nov 6 2006 01:15:29 by NicolasRubio
Help Me Find Borders On My Picture Please... posted Wed Sep 20 2006 20:21:55 by Avro85
Some Help With My Photos Please posted Tue Aug 8 2006 23:26:07 by Globalpics
Are My Photos That Bad, C&C Please posted Sun Jul 23 2006 18:56:05 by Golftango
Redone My Sharpening Technique Opinions Please posted Tue Jul 11 2006 08:26:31 by JumboJim747
An Opinion On These Please To Sustain My Ratio posted Sun Jul 2 2006 19:50:16 by LHRsunriser
Please Help! I Think My Camera Is Broken! posted Fri Jun 2 2006 15:16:45 by AirKas1
My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please posted Fri Apr 28 2006 06:49:52 by INNflight