Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AC Or BA Across The Pond  
User currently offlineFLYGUY From Canada, joined May 1999, 137 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5602 times:

I'm in the process of booking a trip across the pond and wanted to know other's opinions on which airline to fly.

The route will be YCD-YVR-LHR and return. BA and AC are posting similar prices. The AC flight will be in a 763 compared to BA's 744. This will be an economy seat... which airline do you think would be more comfortable and a more enjoyable flight?

Also, several websites are trying to sell AC for YCD-YVR and then BA for YVR-LHR. If I did do this option, would I have to check-in again in YVR with BA, or would AC put my bags right through for me once I check in at YCD.

Thanks guys

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUAEflyer From United Arab Emirates, joined Nov 2006, 1161 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5591 times:

AC = rubbish
Go to BA, they are the expertise over the Atlantic


User currently offlineAloha73G From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2372 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5567 times:

I would take BA....for the 744 and the IFE.

-Aloha!



Aloha Airlines - The Spirit Moves Us. Gone but NEVER Forgotten. Aloha, A Hui Hou!
User currently offlineEHHO From Bulgaria, joined Dec 2005, 815 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5559 times:

Last I've flown in AC transatlantic was 2 years ago, B763 YYZ-FRA. BA was last December on B772, but that was J. I took them in Y on the B744 in August 2005 though, LHR-ORD.

If you're flying in Y, I would go for BA. Not only is a B744 more comfortable than the B763 (less cramped, roomier), the BA inflight product is better. Better food, and they have IFE on PTVs (if you like it). The AC B763 are pretty worn out (I heard they're getting refurbished though), and AC service is of a lower standard overall than BA. And they show old French movies on those huge overhead tricolor projectors.



"Get your facts first. Then you may distort them as much as you please" -- Mark Twain
User currently offlineDALelite From Switzerland, joined Jun 2000, 1770 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5515 times:

BA would be my choice!!!

have a nice flight:DALelite



They loved to fly and it showed..
User currently offlineYYZYHZ From Canada, joined May 2006, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5511 times:

Well the last time I flew BA, I was 3, so I can't really remember, but I hear that the food is good, and they have PTVs. However, if legroom is your main concern, then I'd choose AC as they offer 32-34 inches as opposed to 31 on BA. Also the 767 is 2-3-2, whereas the 747 is 3-4-3, so there is a less odds of getting a middle seat. On a night flight, I'd choose legroom over IFE, but that's just me. Also, AC already has a B767 that is completely refurbished offering PTV's, in is right now working on the rest of the 763 fleet, so you may get on that one, although the chances are probably unlikely. I guess it all depends on what your prefer when it comes to air travel.


Travelled on Dash 8-300, A319, A320, A321, A330, B737, B747, B757, B767, E75
User currently offlineBritPilot777 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1075 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5505 times:

I would personally choose BA (hell I admit I'm biased but here's why)

As you have said, the BA flight would be with a 744 (that should convince anyone Big grin). The food is pretty good with BA and you will have your personal IFE. I am not sure about this with AC but BA still offers free alcohol on international flights. I understand AC are in the process of upgrading their 763's, though I think the majority still have the screen at the front of the cabin which show the inflight entertainment. Even though some people have a problem with 3-4-3 seating, the online check in option is the best way to get the seat you want, and if your travelling after December 5th, nearly every seat will be available to choose from online as per the new seating policy being introduced by BA.

Quoting FLYGUY (Thread starter):
Also, several websites are trying to sell AC for YCD-YVR and then BA for YVR-LHR. If I did do this option, would I have to check-in again in YVR with BA, or would AC put my bags right through for me once I check in at YCD.

As the booking would be under one reservation the bags can be tagged to LHR, though you would need to re check in with BA in YVR and present your bag tag to the agent to enter it under your booking.

Happy Travels!

BritPilot777



Forever Flight
User currently offlineZBBYLW From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 1993 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5488 times:

Quoting BritPilot777 (Reply 6):
As the booking would be under one reservation the bags can be tagged to LHR, though you would need to re check in with BA in YVR and present your bag tag to the agent to enter it under your booking.

I am not so sure weather your bags will be put all the way through or not, I am going to assume they are not though. As for weather AC or BA I am going to have to say AC. The 744 though a novelty to go on, is not as comfortable then a 763 (in the back) 3-4-3 compared to 2-3-2 in my opinion 3-4-3 is going to feel alot more packed then the 2-3-2 of AC. AC is updating the interior of there 763's as well as there 333's (the other plane that flies YVR-LHR). I have flown Y on AC SYD-HNL-YVR and FCO-YYZ on the 763's and FRA-YYZ 744 (last AC 744 flight) and YVR-ICN-YVR 343 and have found that Y is good. Seeing as how you are departing YCD you will be leaving on QK (AC Jazz) and I personally think it would make sense to stay on AC as it will be garenteed that the bags can be checked all the way through to LHR and you can also check in for your LHR flight right in YCD (even though you are going to have to exit security in order to walk over to the international terminal anyhow. Also I am sorry for any spelling mistakes, i pressed the spell check, and every single word except some of the airport locators and the numeric digits turned up red even though i know at least some of them are correct. Tried a few times.

This is the NEW AC interior vs the BA one.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eric Fortin - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dickson Ching - HKAEC




Keep the shinny side up!
User currently offlineNijltje From Belgium, joined Aug 2005, 241 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5488 times:

I flew the 340 and 330 to YYZ from LHR and no PTV, old seats and not so friendly staff. But héy take a few books with you....

User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5488 times:

Quoting FLYGUY (Thread starter):
which airline do you think would be more comfortable and a more enjoyable flight?

BA all the way !


User currently offlineSwissy From Switzerland, joined Jan 2005, 1734 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5325 times:

Well if you have the luck of getting the "makeover" 767 then go with AC, smaller less cramp feeling, but if you have a "old" style ones better book with BA.
Just came back on AC879 ZRH-YYZ (very old 767 interior, old Canadian)
but service & food was very good.

Cheers,


User currently offlineIDISA From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 262 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 5308 times:

I'd choose BA. Have flown on September LHR-YVR and back (B744) and enjoyed so much the flight.

Quoting EHHO (Reply 3):
If you're flying in Y, I would go for BA. Not only is a B744 more comfortable than the B763 (less cramped, roomier), the BA inflight product is better. Better food, and they have IFE on PTVs

Perfectly agree. Sure the B744 is much much better than 763 across the pond, there's no discussion on it. Also service is affordable and crew is as friendly as professional.

IDISA


User currently offlineAY104 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 505 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5264 times:

I recently flew AC YYZ-AMS/DUB-YYZ. Not even a bar service before the meal! Even on the return, a 7 1/2 hrs flight, I thought they would have the bar trolley before the meal, then the meal service accompanied by another bar with beer or wine for the meal. Yes, they do have complimentary booze, but I would rather they charged for it than be so tight. Why would they not want to stretch out the service a bit on a transatlantic flight? I am quite disgusted over the past year how much the AC transatlantic service has diminished. I used to be a big fan of AC, and tried to defend them with all the negative comments they would get. It seems that lately they are really living up to the negative. Too bad, as I am Canadian and did have a pride in AC, even though I did sound a bit patriotic. Refubishing the aircraft interiors doesn't accomplish anything, if they don't have the service to go along with it. I didn't used to mind the aging interiors, because the service was so good. Next trip will be on
Zoom Air, I can't imagine their service being that bad, as a matter of fact I have heard lots of favourable comments about it. Give yourself a break, and try BA. I have had many great flights with them over the years, and don't hesitate to recomment them.
Cheers,
Carl (AY104)



The only thing a customer should expect for his/her loyalty is good service
User currently offlineSSTsomeday From Canada, joined Oct 2006, 1276 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5245 times:

Quoting UAEflyer (Reply 1):
I would take BA....for the 744 and the IFE.

I can't speak from experience on AC transatlantic, but I can with regard to BA.

The individual entertainment units at your seat really help the time go by, and help you forget how cramped you are. I don't know if A/C offers that.

I prefer the 747 (my favorite A/C - but that's not necessarily a practical reason).

Most importantly - BA has the best designed headrests I have ever experienced. They flip around and lock in the position you need, so that you can REALLY lean to one side, recline, and sleep, without them bending back to the neutral position as soon as you lean on them. It's an excellent design, so you no longer have to have a window seat in order to lean to one side and sleep. Bravo BA.

I recently flew on a UA 777! and they had "regular" headrests. My experience is that North American airlines are clearly behind.

(However I understand that on relatively new LH wide body Airbuses, there are empty holes where the IFE should be... So I will avoid LH.)



I come in peace
User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7653 posts, RR: 35
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5241 times:

Having flown both carriers to Europe from YVR several times over the years, I'd have to say that it would be a trade-off of what you prefer.

From a comfort point of view, I'd go with AC. The 747 is just too cramped for my liking.

From a service point of view, both AC and BA offer great service, I have never had a serious problem or complaint with either, however, it does seem that BA does do more to make you feel more welcome on board.

From an entertainment point of view, BA has guaranteed IFE.

Convenience, AC will enable you to be checked in all the way through eliminating the need for you to pick up your bags and re-check in yourself at the BA counter in YVR.

So, if I were travelling that trip, I would go with AC. BA does have somewhat better service and the IFE, but the comfort and convenience that AC provides, for me at least, would be the deciding factors.



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AZ, BA, Or IB Across The Pond posted Mon Jan 24 2005 03:28:21 by WorldAV8R
US 767 Across The Pond: Anyone Been Recently? posted Sat Sep 16 2006 23:37:16 by UpstateDave
VS Or BA To The Caribbean? posted Sat Aug 14 2004 11:49:52 by James768
Airbus Vs Boeing Over The Pond posted Tue Oct 31 2006 03:30:21 by QXatFAT
Question: VS Or BA posted Sat Sep 2 2006 14:30:02 by Jkw777
VS Or BA To MCO? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 10:52:52 by Baguy
AA Vs BA On The ORD-LHR Route posted Mon Jun 26 2006 02:23:08 by Tsaord
First Time Across The Pacific posted Thu May 11 2006 12:52:06 by Biddleonia007
MaxJet Or BA Club World? posted Fri Mar 10 2006 19:23:34 by Stretch 8
Best Views Across The Pacific (Aus/NZ) posted Sat Feb 11 2006 23:42:54 by Aloha717200
Across The Pond To SEA, Return From BOS/IAD/ATL posted Thu May 15 2008 11:49:21 by TGIF
Lhr - YYZ:- AC Or BA posted Tue Jan 29 2008 07:42:06 by B7X7
Iberia, AA, And BA Accross The Pond posted Tue Jun 19 2007 06:57:40 by Carnival air
Getting Across The Pond In June posted Sat Jan 20 2007 19:53:18 by USflysagain
US 767 Across The Pond: Anyone Been Recently? posted Sat Sep 16 2006 23:37:16 by UpstateDave