Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Poll Of The Decade: Pro- Or Anti-DL/US Merger?  
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6493 posts, RR: 2
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 6309 times:

This is the poll of the decade: are you pro-DL/US merger or anti-DL/US merger?

I am totally anti-DL/US merger. Fleet would be a nightmare, Delta employees will suffer, and would probably put Delta in Star Alliance. Not to mention US Airways has already ordered the A350?


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineB742 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 3767 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 6294 times:

I would be personaly against it.

Rob!  wave 


User currently offlineDALelite From Switzerland, joined Jun 2000, 1770 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6285 times:

I am completly against a merger. US just wan'ts to get rid off Delta this way.

DALelite



They loved to fly and it showed..
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 6281 times:

I'm against the merger. HP/US can't finish their merger from a year ago so they should focus on that versus trying to get DL.

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
would probably put Delta in Star Alliance.

That might not be a bad thing though SkyTeam has worked pretty good for me so far.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineDornier328JET From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 122 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 6281 times:

IMHO, DL and US merging is a terrible idea.

First of all, fleet commonality is almost non-existent. MD80's, classic 737's, 737NG, A320, 752, 767, A330, 777, and A350 on order. Integration on DL Connection and US Express would be a disaster as well.

The networks have to much overlap. The result would be overkill on the East Coast and in the West, while neglecting the Midwest and Heartland. Internationally, there would still be no strong network in Asia.

There are to many hubs and focuses to deal with. Sure, they can be removed, but it would be a disaster.

US and HP just completed a merger and should concentrate on finishing that one.

Finally, the consequences for the employees would be immense.

IMO we are looking at a merger that makes even AA and TWA look like a wonderful idea. ( Even though this would have worked if it weren't for 9/11.)


Just my 2 cents.


User currently offlineLetsgetwet From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 609 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6279 times:

If this merger happens, I believe it will eventually be diasterous for the final product. Many hard working people will be hurt only so a few can line their pocket$.

User currently offlineRCS763AV From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4395 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6278 times:

Terrible idea. Both companies would have to invest huge amounts of money (which is not their biggest asset right now) and resources and the benefits would probably come too late to save the new company from bankruptcy.

Plus there are big cons like:

mayor hub overlapping (ATL/CLT, JFK/PHL, SLC/LAS/PHX), US would probably loos a lot here
fleets! (completely different)
regional carrier networks (huge overlapping on the east coast)

I personally think it will never happen.



Les escribo desde el frío de mi verde altiplano.
User currently offlineAeroflot777 From Russia, joined Mar 2004, 3007 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6275 times:

Anti

'Nuff said!

Aeroflot777


User currently offlineThepilot From Canada, joined Jan 2010, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 6270 times:

I am also against.


Filler
Filler
Filler



From YVR
User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6263 times:

Against.

Nothing else left to say.



/// U N I T E D
User currently offlineDesertAir From Mexico, joined Jan 2006, 1461 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 6244 times:

I am against the merger. As I have indicated on numerous threads, I lament the demise of the unique airline cultures that once existed. Most mergers have given us large bland mega carriers. Bring back the days of PSA, Western...

User currently offlineMEACEDAR From Lebanon, joined Oct 2006, 753 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 6242 times:

Neutral...I don't see what DL will gain and US will gain...On top of that, US/HP can't even get there own crap settled.

User currently offlineDeltaGuy767 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 663 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6234 times:

I've been anti since the first leak was issued by Parker's obtrusive ego. Everything everybody has said so far in regards to the merger I believe is correct and include the reasons why I disaprove of said merger.

Cheers from BDL,  wave 
DeltaGuy767



A Good Landing is one you walk away from!
User currently offlineBicoastal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 6230 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
This is the poll of the decade

I hope this was written with tongue in cheek. In the scheme of things in life, this doesn't rate very high.

As for the poll, I'm in favor.


User currently offlineJm017 From Jamaica, joined Jun 2002, 1227 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 6229 times:

I am anti. Dornier328Jet ( reply #4) pretty much has covered the reasons why I think it would be a bad merger.


"It's okay to cheat, if you just really don't like to lose."
User currently offlineCharger From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 273 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 6225 times:

100% Against the merger.

User currently offlineUsAirways16bwi From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1004 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6213 times:

I am against it. US should complete the merger process and get it over with, while staying profitable for a while. Even though they recently made decent profits, theres still stuff to be worked out. Its kindof bad enough they had to go through this with HP, but now its happening again??this time with DL?. This is too much.

On the other hand, DL is getting back on its feet, with a planned emergence out of BK sometime in early 2007. I would think they have been making progress....with all the international routes they just started, the newly added Dash-8s, and the expansion of JFK.

these are two airlines who have been struggling, and are making a turn for the better (hopefully)...why screw it up now and do something like this?


User currently offlineShinkai From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6206 times:

I AM AGAINST THE MERGER!!!

User currently offlineEvan767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2957 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6205 times:

AGAINST! If it goes through, my mother could lose her precious job at Delta that she's had since 1998!


The proper term is "on final" not "on finals" bud...
User currently offlineUsair320 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 991 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6184 times:

Im against it 100%. Doug already Lowered the standards of US he dosent need to do the same to DL.There is no reason US F/A's should be the lowest paid behind NW when NW is in CH. 11. Parker needs to finish up his first merger befo re getting all worked up about another.

User currently offlineAlexPorter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 6178 times:

I'm very much against it!

If US wants to merge with someone they should merge with NW and/or UA (DoJ seems to be more merger-friendly than six years ago... at least if other mergers are going on at the same time). US/DL is a BAD idea!


User currently offlineNitrohelper From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 469 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 6143 times:

No mergers for me !  thumbsdown They never seem to bring the savings as promoted by the spin masters. I would prefer an asset sale to bidding parties. Yes, jobs are lost but that's what normally happens anyways. What is left for TWA employees after AA cleaned house?

User currently offlineHPLASOps From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6135 times:

My gut instinct says this is a bad idea. I know I don't have access to all the numbers and the exact deals between DL's creditors and our offers, but there's a real fishy smell to this deal. I'm rooting for it not to go through, and that we focus on finishing this first merger and making that as great of a success as it can be. DL's strong opposition to the idea makes me not want it to happen. I've never flown on DL, have never had any beefs with the airline, so I don't want our airline to cannibalize their situation if they are not as willing as we are.

User currently offlineAlitalia744 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 4748 posts, RR: 45
Reply 23, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 6118 times:

against it.

i have nothing against the folks over at USAirways, but hope they successfully complete their current merger and the issues associated before reaking havoc on another carrier.

plus i'm a loyal Delta fan.

Big version: Width: 152 Height: 170 File size: 13kb


[Edited 2006-11-24 04:22:10]


Some see lines, others see between the lines.
User currently offlineSonOfACaptain From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1747 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6088 times:

I am 100% FOR the merger. I think it is both brilliant and needed.

-SOAC



Non Illegitimi Carborundum
25 Alitalia744 : Couldn't be because you're from USAirways bretheren?
26 CXA330300 : Against. I smell thousands of f***ed over employees and two airlines off the table.
27 San747 : Chalk me up for AGAINST. US needs to finish merging with HP. DL is too big of an airline to immerse themselves into, there's no fleet commonality, the
28 Post contains images FXramper : 100% Against the merger. No way in hell it's gonna happen.
29 Dl757md : I'm not sure why. Your Daddy will have less of a chance of ever getting his precious job at US back with the merged company. That Kool-Aid your drink
30 SonOfACaptain : Well, maybe that is the difference between me and many others out there. I am not looking at this from a personal view. What I see in this merger is
31 Dl757md : I agree with that. But this merger is not about creating a stronger healthier airline. It is about eliminating a resurgent competitor of an airline t
32 Kmh1956 : Anti. The message you were about to post is too short and probably not of any higher value to the topic at hand. I disagree....I'm contibuting my vote
33 Alitalia744 : DL should remain a stand-alone independent carrier in charge of its own destiny.[Edited 2006-12-06 05:48:58]
34 RwSEA : Terrible idea. 1) Massive hub overlap (JFK/PHL, ATL/CLT, SLC/LAS/PHX) 2) Totally different fleets - only common types are 757 and 737 (but that's a st
35 PHLBOS : Dead set against this proposed merger because it gives way too much control of the East Coast (B6, FL and/or WN don't necessarily fly everywhere) to o
36 DAL767400ER : I'll make this short: Worst.Merger.Proposal.Ever.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WN As The Funniest Airline, YES Or NO posted Thu Aug 17 2006 23:26:58 by Flinhion757
Poll: The End Of Boeing And Airbus posted Thu Jun 1 2006 06:46:09 by Remcor
The 146/Avro: Beauty Or Beast? posted Thu May 19 2005 19:42:31 by Pe@rson
US Hubs - The Good, The Bad And The Ugly! posted Tue Dec 14 2004 00:44:20 by Gilesdavies
Poll: Do You Like Loud Or Quiet Jets? posted Fri Oct 6 2006 07:46:54 by NWDC10
UA Or NW Domestic US Mainland - Hawaii posted Sun Oct 23 2005 21:07:43 by Birka340
Cabin Pics Of Any Yak-40 Or National Airlines posted Fri Jan 12 2001 01:30:48 by Aviationlover1
Easiest Airport In The US With Big Airliners Or RJ posted Fri Nov 3 2006 06:00:34 by Usair320
Most Over Serviced Route In The US Or World Wide. posted Sat Mar 5 2005 18:50:56 by Jdwfloyd
Alitalia Or Continental To The US posted Tue Aug 10 2004 12:58:27 by AviationMaster