Whappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1560 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2355 times:
LH and AA are two liveries that never need to change.
B752OS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1322 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2348 times:
Quoting Whappeh (Reply 2): LH and AA are two liveries that never need to change.
I was always a BIG fan of the old DL livery. I think airlines are adding too much white to the liveries, UA, US/HP, who have recently changed their scehemes, come to mind.
LTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 51 Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2315 times:
The thing is that the colours LH show something. The blue tail with the crane is obviously part of their brand, while the white fuse and grey belly livery denotes clarity, simplicity and positive attributes such as safety and reliability.
AY104 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 503 posts, RR: 7 Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2308 times:
It's like many of the old liveries, one gets a sense of warmth and familiarity. Think how one feels when some of the carriers do paint an aircraft in the old livery, like SAS, AA for example. Don't see why many of the carriers could do any wrong by bringing back old liveries and colour schemes. It saddens me when I think that, for example, Canadian Pacific is no longer. We will never see the old Canada Goose again, even in latter years as that airline became CPAir, and when to a colourful logo, it was never the same. No, I have to give LH full credit for staying more traditional. And Germans are some of the most hospitable people in the world.
Cheers,
AY104
The only thing a customer should expect for his/her loyalty is good service
Leskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 72 Reply 8, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2295 times:
While I don't consider LH's livery brilliant - rather boring - I do agree that there's no real need to change it; just as the link that LTU932 gave in Reply 5, the livery simply is Lufthansa - nothing spectacular, but clean, reliable and safe.
Given the choice between the current one and the previous one with one of those hideous cheatlines, I'd take the current one every time.
FCAFLYBOY From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2006, 471 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2267 times:
Quoting Leskova (Reply 8): While I don't consider LH's livery brilliant - rather boring - I do agree that there's no real need to change it; just as the link that LTU932 gave in Reply 5, the livery simply is Lufthansa - nothing spectacular, but clean, reliable and safe.
True, but a bit of a cop-out, as we could all say the same for BA/AA/QF/TG etc etc, you get my drift!
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, 
, is no reason to spoil it for the rest of us!
From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 6937 posts, 
From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 503 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined May 2006, 1454 posts, 
From Indonesia, joined Jun 2005, 1102 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Jun 2000, 1770 posts, 
!
Printer friendly format 
