Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A.netter Opinions On Newer Aircraft  
User currently offlineSacamojus From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 228 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3149 times:

When I read the trip reports or some other thread listed, I often come across posts that say newer aircraft are nicer to fly on. I recently took trip on WN on one of the 737-700, and I couldn't wait to be back on board one of DL old 767. So my question is this, How important is having a newer aircraft to you and why? Don't say IFE on Jetblue, as it as to be comparable.

EX. MD80 vs. 737NG, 767 vs. 777......

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3138 times:

Quoting Sacamojus (Thread starter):
Don't say IFE on Jetblue, as it as to be comparable.

It's precisely because of things like this that many people prefer newer aircraft! That's the point - they're not comparable. Newer aircraft aren't any faster than 15-20 year old ones, so the differentiators are all in the product available - more comfortable seas, better IFE, etc. Especially for long-haul flights (forget domestic US, which is really just a bus ride) this makes all the difference.

- Edited to add: this should be in Polls & preferences.

[Edited 2007-01-21 03:33:30]

User currently offlineZippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5420 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3125 times:

Quoting Sacamojus (Thread starter):
I recently took trip on WN on one of the 737-700, and I couldn't wait to be back on board one of DL old 767

It's like comparing riding/driving in a 1959 Cadillac with fins vs. riding/driving in a 2007 bargain basement stripped down Daewoo. The 737-700 WN is newer but, that 767 DL being a wide body. The question or thread could actually be:
Why do passengers prefer a wide body vs. a single asile airliner? Both are comperable speed wise. And, if the wide body bird is configured for maximum single class yield you actually may be more comfortable in your run of the mill
737-700 or A-320!



I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlineSacamojus From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 228 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3121 times:

IFE and cabins can be rebuilt (DL's current transcon plans). So then does it still matter?

User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3118 times:

Quoting Zippyjet (Reply 2):
Why do passengers prefer a wide body vs. a single asile airliner?

Why do you think they do? 99% of the public won't notice anything beyond it being "a bit bigger" or "a bit smaller" than usual - it's an a.net phenomenon to be obsessed with wide / narrow bodies  Smile

On my last CO 757 transatlantic flight the woman I was sitting next to commented on how it was great to fly on such a big airplane, much bigger than when she usually flies to Europe!! Unless she has a private jet I think she was confused.


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11574 posts, RR: 61
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3115 times:

When planning a trip specifically to fly aircraft then it has quite the opposite affect, I try to select the oldest possible aircraft (even if it means going right out of my way) because I know many will soon be retired and I want to fly on as many possible types before they are withdrawn.

On other flights I take a lot the age has nothing to do with my choice, the price though does as I'm a student - money matters. If there is no difference then I'll select the 'most fun' such as a B757/B767 over the Bus320 family so I at least get a interesting take off!

Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineTrijetsRMissed From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2245 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3101 times:

Quoting Sacamojus (Thread starter):
So my question is this, How important is having a newer aircraft to you and why?

You have the newschool fans which want to fly on the latest, up to date, fbw modern designs with as much IFE as possible, which is fine, especially on long flights. Think old AA 762 vs. new CO 764. And then you have those of us who love the classic jets and try to enjoy them while we still can. Just think of all the a.netters that miss the 727! Most of the time I fall into the latter category. These days, I'll take a Mad Dog any day over a 737NG.



There's nothing quite like a tri-jet.
User currently offlineAY104 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 505 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3033 times:

Still prefer a 767 over just about any other. That is, in economy, because that is how I mostly fly. I have yet to try the 777, maybe I will like the AC ones, the seat width is an inch wider than on any of their other aircraft. The IFE really makes little difference to me, I got an MP3 player with lots of memory and a pair of noise-cancelling headphones, so I can listen to my jazz for hours! As long as they get me safely from point A to B, and decent service I'm pretty happy. Long live the 767, especially for those of us who ride mostly in Y.
Cheers,
AY104



The only thing a customer should expect for his/her loyalty is good service
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3006 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 5):
I try to select the oldest possible aircraft (even if it means going right out of my way) because I know many will soon be retired and I want to fly on as many possible types before they are withdrawn.



Quoting Zippyjet (Reply 2):
It's like comparing riding/driving in a 1959 Cadillac with fins vs. riding/driving in a 2007 bargain basement stripped down Daewoo.

 checkmark   yes 

Give me the older and/or bigger aircraft.
I remember booking a trip to Hawaii back in summer 2000. (SFO-HNL).
It was one of those package deals and the travel agent couldn't understand why I was willing to pay more to fly on United instead of Aloha out of Oakland.
United was still using the 747-200 on this leg and Aloha was already using those little 737-700s.
I already know what the 737NG is all about and they'll be around in service for another 30 years to come. The 747-200 is gone from most fleets.
The UA 747-200 flight was excellent and it's a shame those planes were scrapped just 2 months after that flight.

I also chose Cubana's IL-62 over Mexicana 757 to Havana several years ago.
Come on, if your flying to Cuba or Russia, its a MUST to fly there on Russian/Soviet aircraft.  yes 



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineHoppe777 From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3003 times:

Well it makes me feel alot safer that im flying a 777 than an old 767. I cant stand the way they rattle when your sitting at the back, they feel liek they are goign to fall apart and flying a 777 or 747 actually makes you fel like your going on holiday =)


Sometime in easter 10 .... yet to book :)
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2998 times:

Quoting Hoppe777 (Reply 9):
I cant stand the way they rattle when your sitting at the back, they feel liek they are goign to fall apart

 confused 
Wouldn't that be the carrier's fault and not he aircraft itself?
My 767 experiences have almost all been good.

Those most comfortable flights I've been on were
747-200s, DC-10, IL-62 and TU-154. This is just within the last 5 years too.

The aircraft I try to avoid the most is the A320. I'd rather fly on a turbo-prop or RJ if I have the choice.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineTrijetsRMissed From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2245 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2980 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 8):
United was still using the 747-200 on this leg and Aloha was already using those little 737-700s.
I already know what the 737NG is all about and they'll be around in service for another 30 years to come. The 747-200 is gone from most fleets.

Good call. I'm glad I got in some 727 and F100 flights before they diseappeared from scheduled service in th US. I kick myself for not routing flights to fly on the DL L-1011 or NW DC-10. It doesn't present itself, coming from ORD.

Getting on some rare birds is always a thrill. Like you said, 737NG will be everywhere for years to come. Two airliners I'd like to fly on before they're gone are the AY MD-11 and DL MD-90.



There's nothing quite like a tri-jet.
User currently offlineLHRBFSTrident From UK - Northern Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 653 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2978 times:

I can't really understand the affection for the Mad Dog here...

so the 2+3 seating is good, if you're on the 2 side: and the cabin noise is virtually non-existent ahead of the wings, so far so good,

but,

terrible air-conditioning on the ground - the worst - when I was a CO top Elite and an AA Plat travelling x3 weekly out of SAT/AUS on their respective MD-80s to DFW, IAH, LAX etc the priority boarding just meant that you sat and sweat for 10 minutes more than the rest of the pax: a change of shirt guaranteed on every trip!

and have you ever tried to put any kind of carry-on in those overheads - some lap-tops don't even fit!

plus - this is probably just me - you always seem to be miles from a decent-sized exit (only 2 in total that I can count) that won't get hopelessly jammed by tripping pax in an evacuation

now a 73G will give you decent a/c, decent overhead space, 'full'-sized exits x4 - but at the 'cost' of 3+3 and louder cabin. Another point: the 73G cabin panels and lighting are a minor but quite significant improvement over the 1980s Boeing standard.

But, that said, I'll always take a widebody over a narrowbody - and a rare bird over a common bird...



Next up: LAX-LHR NZ002 Y SkyCouch! LHR-LAX NZ001 Y
User currently offlineTrijetsRMissed From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2245 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 months 15 hours ago) and read 2953 times:

Quoting LHRBFSTrident (Reply 12):
I can't really understand the affection for the Mad Dog here...



Quoting LHRBFSTrident (Reply 12):
terrible air-conditioning on the ground - the worst - when I was a CO top Elite and an AA Plat travelling x3 weekly out of SAT/AUS on their respective MD-80s

To each their own. The overhead bins are a bit small, but I've always managed to get my carry on in them. The exits are not a big deal to me, and the quiet cabin is very nice. The 2/3 cabin format of course is a plus. And on top of that its a beatufil bird.

For the record though, not all MD-80s are the same. CO had many second hand MD-81's, which I'm sure were a lot more rundown than DL MD-88's. Take the MD-90 into account, and the difference in the cabin is even greater. Better interior, LCD drop down screens, etc. It has more in common with an A320 (including engines) than an old CO MD-81.



There's nothing quite like a tri-jet.
User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7073 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2922 times:

If given a choice, everytime and all things being equal, I will choose to travel on the 744 over the 777.

User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2913 times:

Quoting ZKSUJ (Reply 14):
If given a choice, everytime and all things being equal, I will choose to travel on the 744 over the 777.

Same here!  yes 



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2908 times:

If it ain't Boeing, I'm not going!

Newer any day, hate blue water, give me vacuum lavs any day, have yet to see anybody come out of the lav during turbulence on a new plane with blue stains all over them!  laughing 

Newer any day, more amenities onboard, better ventilation systems, quiet motors, and fly higher to avoid storms.

Yes, still love the B727 though and wish they were in airline fleets.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2907 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 16):
Yes, still love the B727 though and wish they were in airline fleets.

...but then you'd get blue stains all over you while you're in the lavatory during turbulence.  Silly



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2901 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 17):
...but then you'd get blue stains all over you while you're in the lavatory during turbulence.

In a 72 ya never go to the lav, might miss something fun!  Smile



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Experience/opinions On Go Air (India)? posted Sun Jan 7 2007 18:52:02 by 22right
Have You Ever Flown On A 'doomed' Aircraft? posted Fri Aug 11 2006 16:34:42 by ThePRGuy
Your Opinions On Lufthansa And FRA/MUC? posted Fri Aug 11 2006 00:37:09 by B742
Opinions On NW? posted Tue Jun 13 2006 00:55:39 by JetBlueAUS
Your Scariest Moment On An Aircraft? posted Mon Apr 24 2006 03:16:16 by Usair320
Flown On A Doomed Aircraft? posted Fri Mar 10 2006 01:56:18 by DENplanenut
Opinions On ATA? posted Wed Nov 16 2005 05:36:53 by Frontiercpt
Opinions On Allegiant Airlines? posted Sat Oct 8 2005 17:09:39 by Frontiercpt
Star Alliance Livery- Best On Which Aircraft? posted Wed Jul 27 2005 01:49:20 by PPVRA
When Is Your Next Flight And On Which Aircraft Pt2 posted Fri Jul 8 2005 22:29:40 by Trekster