PacNWjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 908 posts, RR: 0 Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4643 times:
What is the longest you can remain comfortable on a regional jet? Recently I flew from Las Vegas (LAS) to Portland (PDX) on a Horizon Air CRJ-700. The flight was two and a half hours long. I am not a large person (5 foot 10 inches; 170 pounds), but by the end of the flight I felt pretty achy. It makes me wonder, how long can the average person sit in a regional jet seat before they start feeling cramped?
PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11559 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4632 times:
So long as the leg-room is just the same as on the carriers mainline aircraft, then I really don't mind. I could sit on Air Nostrums CRJ200's for the longest flight they operate (in fact I have - over 2 hours) and not feel any problems.
Generally though I don't get up much when in-flight, a few months ago I slept and read my way through a 13 hour HKG-CDG flight without getting up once.
...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
United319 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 520 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4618 times:
I've been on a UA flight that was a CRJ-200 ORD-JAX and that was 3 hours long, it wasnt so bad. I dont mind the regional jets as long as I get a window seat that isnt really hard to look out of. The exit row on a CR7 is nearly impossible to look out of. I also find the engines on the CRJ's to be annoying after a while, they really seem to whine.
FlyBoy84 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 368 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4511 times:
Comfort is NON-EXISTENT! I have flown both the ERJ and the CRJ on STL-CLT and back. The ERJ is EXCRUCIATING; the CRJ is acceptable as long as nobody is sitting NEXT to you. Those planes are best suited for private use carrying 10-20 passengers versus 50-100!
CRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2148 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4483 times:
Quoting Wdair310 (Reply 4): AC jazz has comfy seats and attentive attendands.
I hardly ever read any comments about Jazz' flagship, the CRJ705, neither complaints or favourable comments... are the 705s so comfy that nobody has a reason to complain but not so comfy that anyone will write specifically about it? The 705s fly 4-hour nonstops, don't they?
The CRJ200, on the other hand, is one of the most talked-about aircraft on A.net...
GFFgold From Indonesia, joined Feb 2007, 443 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4473 times:
I have taken a few 2hr flights in ARJ/BAe246 planes in Europe and the biggest problem was seat width. If nobody was sitting in the middle seat there were no problems but otherwise eating could be an elbows-in-pockets experience. I used to put up with this, however, for the convenience of flying out of LCY.
The worst thing about the ARJ is the loss of overhead locker space in those rows under thw wing mounting. You end up with lockers only just deep enough to store a laptop.
Hoppe777 From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4460 times:
Well ive been stuck on a CRJ-200 for over 6 hours........yes over 6 long hours.
Flying from Washington Dulles to JFK with United express operated by mesa airlines.
first there was a 2 hour delay before we went anywhere at Washington and when we finally took off we ended up landing in Baltimore because JFK had been closed due to bad storms and heavy traffic. We waited for another 2 hours in Baltimore to refuel and by that stage we had run out of snacks and water.......only to find out we were going back to Dulles. Full credit to the flight attendant who managed to keep everyone in good spirits and well it was sheer bad luck that all this happened. So being 6'3 i cant even stand straight in the cabin of a small regional ailiner so sitting for 6 hours was an absolute nightmare.
PacNWjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 908 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4445 times:
Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 6): It took 2.5 hours for LAS-PDX...on a CRJ??? Thats a short flight, sure it wasnt 1.5 hours?
I know that sounds wrong, but there were very strong headwinds and rather heavy turbulence, so what should have been a two hour flight at most turned into two and a half hours. According to the flight calculator at www.airportcitycodes.com, the flight time from LAS to PDX is 1 hour 54 minutes (block time 2 hours 9 minutes), so with the strong headwinds about 20 minutes were added to the time spent on the plane from gate to gate. Again, I am not a big person, but two and a half hours on a CRJ was enough to be uncomfortable on that particulatr flight.
RAFVC10 From Spain, joined Sep 2005, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4443 times:
Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 1): So long as the leg-room is just the same as on the carriers mainline aircraft, then I really don't mind. I could sit on Air Nostrums CRJ200's for the longest flight they operate (in fact I have - over 2 hours) and not feel any problems.
I'm agree with you. The longest Regional Jet flight that I've flown was in the AGP-TFN route with CR2 YW equipment (2 hours and 30 minutes) and was so pleasant.
If I can consider an Embraer E170 to WAW from BCN with LO, I must to say that is a great aircraft but the crew made the flight little bored (any smile on flight).
El dia que los gilipollas vuelen, no podremos ver la luz del sol!
DesertAir From Mexico, joined Jan 2006, 1444 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4431 times:
I flew a couple of times from PHX to PDX on a Messa RJ and by the end of the flight my bottom was sore. Their planes have very poor padding. I dislike these regional jets because they always feel cramped to me and are uncomfortable.
JGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4430 times:
Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 1): could sit on Air Nostrums CRJ200's for the longest flight they operate (in fact I have - over 2 hours) and not feel any problems.
You are clearly a gnome ! Nobody can sit on a CRJ200 for more than 5 minutes without suffering permanent curvature of the spine - they're awful ! ERJ's are much better - I've flown MAN-NCE and RDU-STL-DEN on ERJ's, all involved sectors of over 2 hours, in perfect comfort. I had to fly RIX-VIE on a CRJ, that was 2 hours, and a few times NCE-VIE (1:50) - it nearly kills me every time.
LACA773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3925 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 4361 times:
Myself I've been lucky to not have flown on a C/ERJ.
From what I understand from the remarkable discussions about them on here and other sites is that the ERJ is the most comfortable if you were to sit down and average preferences. I think that's because of the ERJ having a solo seat on the left side of the cabin vs the traditional 2-2 seating on commuter aircraft where as the ERJ has 1-2.
Hopefully more airlines will order the E7X & E9X a/c's. They seem to be great from a passengers perspective but somewhat annoying in the beginng as the majority of airlines have had "teething problems" like all new a/c but seem to be more remarkable do to the fact they have these new and sophiscated computer systems and programs that are hypersensitive to just about everything.
It would be great if Horizon got the E75/E95s with the routes they have. Customers and flight crews would be a lot happier and it would allow them to open more routes they don't currently serve. I.E., flying to smaller destinations in Mexico where a 73G is too big and a C/ERJ are just not too desirable from the customer's point of view. A E75/95 would be so much more comfortable and would drive more flyers to take those flights vs a C/ERJ. Another example: HPX had nonstops from LAX to PVR/MZT/SJD on CRJs for a while. But who would want to fly on one of those when they can fly on a nice AS 73G/8/9 or MX 32X and similar on AM which also comes with decent on board service? No wonder their new flights were short lived. Both DL & CO are using the C/ERJs on some flights to Mexico from LAX and though I love both airlines very much I don't see these flights beng too popular and being around for any significant period of time unless they get larger RJs.
Airbus3801 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1089 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 4350 times:
Flying the CRJ-200 a year ago I didn't feel uncomfortable on a HP express flight, but recently flying an ERJ-145 from MAN-GLA and back, the ERJ was very uncomfortable. Besides being cramped, the thing that can kill an RJ is the seats, if the seats like iron like the ones on the BMI 145 and FlyBE/BA Connect 145, it is very painful to even sit back. The seat can make or break it....
ERJ135 From Australia, joined Nov 2000, 678 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4295 times:
It all depends on the individual, the airline and to a degree the aircraft. I have been perfectly comfortable on regional jets on flights over three hours, I have been pressed against against the cabin wall in a 747 on a 1 hour flight and felt really cramped in a 777-300 because the two people next to me made my life a living hell. At least on the ERJ I can have a seat to myself, with a big window, no overhead container and a decent seat pitch. Also it doesn't take half an hour to get everyone on or off!