Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Best European Hub For Connecting Passengers?  
User currently offlineVinnieWinnie From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 806 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5977 times:

Hi everyone,

I was wondering which airport(s) in your opinion is the best hub for connecting passengers? Which airport(s) do you think deserves a gold medal and which one(s) do you think deserve the thump down?

The reason I am asking this question is because I just experienced Zurich as a Hub and I was pretty amazed! I was flying from Athens to London via Zurich and thought that the facilities were impressive, the duty free zone was varied and interesting and that going through security was a breeze! This was only my 2nd experience after Madrid from which I don't remember much!

Thinking back about my home airport (Brussels) I really don't understand how BRU could become a nice quick efficient HUB when Sabena was still around! Separating Schengen and non Schengen flight is pretty ridiculous since connecting from one flight to the other would take at least 30 to 40 mins with plenty of stress since BRU has only 2 long piers (A-B) connected with each other with only one tunnel at the beginning of the pier!

Sorry if this question has been asked before...

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3612 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5899 times:

ZRH and VIE are probably the best.

AMS is good except for the extra security checks required in intercontinental flights, and stupid revolving doors at the gates leading to the busses for the remote "cityhopper" flights.

LHR, and LGW absolutely suck, as they will force the checking of your second carry-on bag. I didn't think it was possible for a country to have a more obnoxious security system than the USA.

CDG is mentioned somewhere in Dante's "Inferno", and I think it was around the 6th level of hell. CDG is probably the worst in the world.

User currently offlineOzGlobal From France, joined Nov 2004, 2790 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5869 times:

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 1):
CDG is mentioned somewhere in Dante's "Inferno", and I think it was around the 6th level of hell. CDG is probably the worst in the world.

Do a search on "The Worlds 10 Travel Gates of Hell" from a couple of years back and you'll find the reference. How about we form a people's army and hold military style tribunals for ADP, the useless 'fonctionaires' who run CDG? Mind you, try being an international transit passenger at any US airport. That is in a league of its own.....

Here it is..: http://www.airliners.net/discussions...ation_polls/read.main/29503#menu26

[Edited 2007-03-30 22:34:20]

When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26562 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5846 times:

From my personal connecting experience, and all within the past year except for FRA and CPH:

1. ZRH
2. AMS
3. MUC
4. FRA
5. CPH
6. CDG
7. LGW
8. LHR

User currently offlineMatt1167 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5819 times:

The only two airports in Europe which I've used for connecting flights are KEF and AMS.

I thought AMS wasn't too bad, especially for an airport of its size. It certainly was better than, say, ORD, for example.

I used KEF when I travelled JFK-CDG via KEF (Icelandair), and I must say, KEF was definately one of the better, if not the best, airports I've ever connected through. The terminal, although a bit small, had enough to keep me content for the 1:30 layover, and the connections from US cities to European cities are excellently timed, since the US flights arrive in the morning and the European flights depart in the morning.

From my experiences, I would definately rate KEF the best in Europe for connecting.

User currently offlineMainMAN From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 2117 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5752 times:

Ultimately it depends which hub you're used to. I've only ever connected through AMS and FRA, and AMS is pretty easy, although I always seem to be late arriving there and have to run through it.

User currently offlineBA777 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2184 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5734 times:

AMS...without a doubt.


User currently offlineKrje1980 From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 203 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5676 times:

In my opinion, AMS and CPH are by far the best. AMS because of the variety of options to keep yourself occupied with, as well as the ease in navigating the airport despite its size. CPH because of its beautfiul interior design as well as its cozy and laid-back atmosphere compared to behemots such as FRA or CDG (by far the worst airport I have ever encountered).

User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5719 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5661 times:

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 1):
ZRH and VIE are probably the best.

When I used VIE it seemed that each gate had its own security check point and equipment and teams moved from gate to gate as planes began boarding. Does VIE have sterile transit facilities or do transit pax get a second security check?

LHR is one to avoid.

I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineAndaman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5600 times:

ACI, Airports Council International, ranked the European airports 2006 like this:
Worlds Best Airports 2007 (by WINGS Mar 14 2007 in Civil Aviation)

1. Brussels
2. Zurich
3. Helsinki

Helsinki has been ranked high especially for the quick and easy transit services (especially Europe-Asia).

User currently offlineCPH757 From Denmark, joined Sep 2005, 684 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 5576 times:

Well, AMS is great, although it's very big.

I'd imagine CPH is great as well, it's layout seem very efficient for connections, although I have only used it as starting/ending point, and for that, it's just excellent.

KEF is a eralier said a great airport to connect in. Everything is running smoothly, and you have enough to do for the 1-2 hours of waiting, but there is not much to spot besides FI 757's and an occasional american jet fighter.

CDG...Well, It has gone up on my list since I've visited LGW. CDG is messy, dirty, hard to navigate, rude people all over, but when you know it, you can get through it pretty fast, and have never lost my luggage, even with 2 times 45 minute connections including terminal switch. I'd prefer other airports, but the service of AF usually makes me go through CDG anyway.

LGW. What a hellhole. Crowded, stupid ridiculous BAA security stuff. Old and ugly as well. Designed for cramping people. Then comes all the arguments making it a sucker airport when O&D'ing. I have never been to LHR, it's probably worse!!

Last flight: SAW-CPH on H9 on 02/11/09 - Next Flights: 23/12/09 CPH-AAL on QI, 30/12/09 CPH-LHR on SK, 19/01/10 CPH-CDG-
User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3778 posts, RR: 13
Reply 11, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5491 times:

I agree with, well, everyone that CDG is probably the worst. Talk about security checkpoints turning into passenger bottle-necks, and in the two times I've been there, it has always taken more than 40 mins to get through security. Luckily, some airlines have understood this and send staff members to prowl the security lines to fetch people... So, instead of solving the problem, they just let people who are running a little late cut in line, even though it's often the line that's the reason for the delay... It's absurd, really.

AMS is alright, I've never had any major problems there.

MUC and FRA are good. Easy to navigate, plenty of gate-adjacent amenities.


Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 53
Reply 12, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5481 times:

I find MUC to be excellent, CPH too.

Conversely i find FRA to be a bit of a pain.

I cant speak for LHR as i only use that to start or finish my flights, but i suspect it is god awful. Hopefully T5 will improve matters - at least from a BA perspective.

Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently offlineRIXrat From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 796 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5458 times:

I really like CPH. Even with the new addition, they have designed it to be on one floor with plenty of shops and food courts to spend your time for the connection.

My second choice would be Helsinki. Not as big as CPH, but also on one floor with a decent array of shops to waste your time.

CDG is very hard to navigate from terminal to terminal. I had a 45 minute connection to PRG and the incoming aircraft parked on the ramp and we had to be bussed to some obscure door without any markings. Once inside, I followed the signs to the departure ramp which included going OUTSIDE again with no security in sight and then back through another door for the new security check-in. I made it, though.

I don't like Brussels because of the up and down escallator bit and walking for miles. I also don't like LHR Terminal 1 where the ceilings are just above your head, giving it that claustrophobic feeling. LGW is all right, because I'm usually going on vacation from there and all that matters is whether the connecting flight is on time.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best European Airport For Transit posted Fri Oct 15 2004 23:54:51 by Checo77
Best Hub For The New Varig posted Sat Jul 29 2006 19:11:25 by C010T3
Which Airport Is The Best For Connecting Flights? posted Sun Dec 4 2005 22:34:30 by B742
Survey For Europe-US Hub For Connections posted Tue Feb 27 2007 19:20:52 by 767-332ER
What Is The Best European Livery? posted Sun Feb 4 2007 20:34:33 by Dc9northwest
All Round Best US Hub City? posted Mon Jan 22 2007 19:09:17 by Zone1
Referendum Best Airlines Colours For 2006 posted Tue Dec 26 2006 21:11:38 by 1981
Iberia Best European Airline? posted Fri Dec 22 2006 15:58:19 by RootsAir
International Lounges For Economy Passengers posted Thu Oct 19 2006 19:54:19 by Dimoko
Best Internet Source For Commercial Aviation News posted Tue Jun 20 2006 05:40:18 by Btriple7