A330Fan1 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 856 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 5 hours ago) and read 2544 times:
New livery looks good - I've gotten used to seeing the old one around since it's been there for a long time, but both have good and bad qualities. One isn't better than the other, they are just completely different designs.
NZblue From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 639 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2500 times:
I honestly do like the new color scheme, though it might look a bit better, IMHO, if they incorporated some red into the design other than just the small amount on the "U" logo.
My favorite part about the new look is the tail, which I think is just striking. The whole paint job is worlds away from the battleship grey, which I never really liked from the beginning. That scheme never grew on me where as I think this one has that potential indeed.
It's an entirely different kind of flying; all together.
RoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 11166 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2500 times:
My favorite part of the new C/S is that it brightens up the planes. The gray is very dreary, especially in a Midwest winter. The white and bright blues convey a happier cheerier image to me, which I like. Although I feel that the old scheme conveyed a more professional image. I vote for the new one.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!