Flyvabb From India, joined Apr 2007, 63 posts, RR: 0 Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 6812 times:
I just saw the new Jet Airways livery on the 737 and wanted your opinion. When they unveiled their new colours on the 77W's i didnt quite like the colours at all. But slowly the new look grew on me and i started to like it.
But now when i see the livery on the much shorted 738, im not too sure about the way it looks on the 77W, it you notice, the livery looks much more "full" on the smaller plane than on the 737. Contrary to this fact, many people have expressed their satisfaction on the ivery on the 737.
Do you think this livery should have been left as a "special" livery? What is the general opinion on the new colours on the 737.
FLYACYYZ From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 1914 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 6782 times:
Looks more like a classic 70's livery, although I like it. Is there any cultural significance to the colour scheme as well as the tail logo. The tail logo reminds me of a stylized Pac-Man image? Anybody out there old enough to remember Pac-Man??
Flyvabb From India, joined Apr 2007, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 6614 times:
Yes, i also personally feel that they should have added a tad bit of ethnicity to the livery. But then again, i dunno maybe they are thinking on the lines of SQ, MH, etc whose liveries are rather plain but yet are well known.
I think the ribbon livery is more fit to be some sort of special livery rather than a standard one. On the 77W there is just too much dead space and even the titles seem to have just been randomly placed ont he fwd part of the fuselage.