Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ugliest Airliners?  
User currently offlineIrobertson From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 563 posts, RR: 5
Posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 17946 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

What are your nominations for ugliest airliners? I don't mean paint schemes, I mean designs.

Here's one to get us started: The Armstrong Argosy

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralf Manteufel



23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2494 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 17945 times:

Frankly, the Carvair was pretty ugly too.


"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 8199 posts, RR: 66
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 17939 times:

I can't actually think of one, but I give it only a few posts before somebody mentions the A380. All aircraft have their good and bad points aesthetics wise.


Dan Smile


If I Get G-WOWD again I'll Scream....!!!!
User currently offlineTruemanQLD From Australia, joined Feb 2007, 813 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 17906 times:

Big version: Width: 2236 Height: 1275 File size: 686kb


A380 is beautiful (not A vs B'ing)

User currently offlineSrbmod From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 14391 posts, RR: 61
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 17848 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting Irobertson (Thread starter):

Considering it was originally designed as a military cargo a/c, functionality trumps aesthetics.

Quoting 57AZ (Reply 1):
Frankly, the Carvair was pretty ugly too.

Another example of functionality trumping aesthetics.

I think Shorts wins the prize for Ugliest Airliners:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Vaeremans
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jordi Grife - Iberian Spotters



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Oates



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ven Stephan
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © GAAEC



A/C so ugly that no livery makes the a/c look good.

If it ever does enter production, the Utility Aerospace FF-1080 will definitely rank up there among the ugliest a/c:


Looks like a Shorts 360 and a Do 228 had a kid.


Shut up, Balders. You'd laugh at a Shakespeare comedy.
User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 17848 times:

I'm not sure if "ugly" is the right word for an airliner...remember that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder".

However, here are some of my votes for the "Most Visually Displeasing":

The VFW 614:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Torben Guse
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Seemann



This one has to go down as the most crack-smoking inspired idea - putting the engines on TOP of the wing?

The Shorts 330:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Vaeremans
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Oates



The Shorts 360:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wingnut



The flying boxes.

And yet, they all got airborne and flew.


Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
User currently offlineB747forever From United States of America, joined May 2007, 14381 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 17841 times:

Why hasn't anyone mentioned the Airbus Super Transporter???

That is one of the ugliest aircraft in the history. Makes my cry when I see it.


Boeing, it is all about Boeing and the 747!
User currently offlineMAN23R From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 252 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 17836 times:

any Russian aircraft, bloody awful...

User currently offlineZBBYLW From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 1827 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 17818 times:

Quoting PanAm747 (Reply 5):
This one has to go down as the most crack-smoking inspired idea - putting the engines on TOP of the wing?

Well consider this, the gear does not to be extremely long, and they dont need to have aft C of G problems. In those two cases its a win-win.


Keep the shinny side up!
User currently offlineYflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 521 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 17818 times:

I think the Dreamlifter deserves a mention. There are probably uglier planes out there, but I like the way an acquaintance in Seattle described it. "It looks like a 747 with a bad allergic reaction."

User currently offlineB747forever From United States of America, joined May 2007, 14381 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 17814 times:

Quoting Yflyer (Reply 9):
but I like the way an acquaintance in Seattle described it. "It looks like a 747 with a bad allergic reaction."

That is a great description.


Boeing, it is all about Boeing and the 747!
User currently offlinePilotboi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 2299 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 17807 times:

Quoting B747forever (Reply 6):
Why hasn't anyone mentioned the Airbus Super Transporter???

That is one of the ugliest aircraft in the history. Makes my cry when I see it.

I don't really think it's ugly. It's odd looking, yes. But I think it, along with the B747LCF, are kind of cool looking. The main reason I thinnk is because of the size. Also - these aren't really 'airliners' - they are for cargo use only, so not sure if you can include them in that category.


A Widgethead like no other
User currently offlineLrdc9 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 459 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 17793 times:

Shorts Skyvan, OMG that thing is ugly IMO!!!


Republic Airlines is just that good. // The E170 is my rocketship.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 11647 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 17784 times:

Quoting MAN23R (Reply 7):
any Russian aircraft, bloody awful...

I don't totally agree. I've always liked the IL-62.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mats Lundberg
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tom Turner



The Tu-154 isn't bad either.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tamon Takeoka - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fyodor Borisov - Russian AviaPhoto Team



User currently offlineShannoninAMA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 17773 times:

 vomit  Easy one.



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mel Lawrence
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bob Garrard




Fine, it was designed for military use, but still  Wink



Shan Big grin

User currently offlineB747forever From United States of America, joined May 2007, 14381 posts, RR: 12
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 17749 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 13):
The Tu-154 isn't bad either.

It looks really great in Aeroflot's colors.


Boeing, it is all about Boeing and the 747!
User currently offlineRAFVC10 From Spain, joined Sep 2005, 1808 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 17741 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

PZL-Mielec M-15


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mick Bajcar
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Piotr Marek (EPGD Spotters)



Myasishchev VM-T


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jim Newton

>

Beriev Bartini VVA 14


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Francisco José Jurado Ariza



Beriev Be-12 Chaika


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Max Bryansky - Russian AviaPhoto Team



Mil Mi-10K


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sergey Krivchikov - Russian AviaPhoto Team



(...)

Regards,

Gerard


El dia que los gilipollas vuelen, no podremos ver la luz del sol!
User currently offlineBmi332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 17740 times:

Although as Pilotboi said not really an airliner, it was pretty ugly

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bernhard Bauske



User currently offlineCXfirst From Norway, joined Jan 2007, 1697 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 17727 times:

Quoting Bmi332 (Reply 17):
Although as Pilotboi said not really an airliner, it was pretty ugly

From how I read their posts, it seems they were talking about the airbus super transporter, not the airbus skylink (otherwise known as the super guppy; rather fitting name).

Here's another photo of what I would say is the ugliest plane ever built.



-CXfirst


From Norway, live in Australia
User currently offlinePilotboi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 2299 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 17693 times:

Quoting CXfirst (Reply 18):
From how I read their posts, it seems they were talking about the airbus super transporter, not the airbus skylink (otherwise known as the super guppy; rather fitting name).

Yeah, the ST...but we can include the Guppy and Super Guppy with them.


A Widgethead like no other
User currently offlineAlaska737 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 971 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 17687 times:

I dont have a picture but the BAE AEW. 3 Nimrod has to be the ugliest plane ever even though it isnt an airliner it was based off one....


Fly with a happy face!
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 11647 posts, RR: 13
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 17675 times:

The Beech 1900D with the taller fuselage to improve headroom doesn't win any beauty contests. All the little aerodynamic strakes and fences hanging from almost all parts of the tail section don't help. The head-on view of the Beech 1900D always reminds me of the A380.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bruno Tucci
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joseph A. Del Guidice



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Oliver Brunke



User currently offlineJCKastrup From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 17553 times:

Quoting RAFVC10 (Reply 16):
PZL-Mielec M-15

OMG.............

Really hope the designer got some kind of punishment.


Row row row your plane gently down the stream
User currently offlineN5014K From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 52 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 17488 times:

They're almost all beautiful to me, even the SD-330. When I was a kid at BAL (now BWI) some commuter operated for a while that used Dornier Do-28's. I always thought they were homely.

Ditto the GAF Nomad.

To me the Martin 404's design still seems to be "off" in some way I could never quite put my finger on; my Dad worked on the 404 assembly line.

I think the Comet looked ungainly on the ground, but in flight it was something to see.

I never cared for the looks of the Yak-40.

I agree that the Carvair can be hard to look at. Ditto the Bristol 170 Mk32.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pax Airliners Vs Cargo Airliners posted Tue Nov 18 2008 22:00:31 by Pilotboi
Favourite Engine Type On Todays Airliners? posted Sat Oct 11 2008 15:39:03 by Virgin747LGW
Which Of These Airliners Design You Like Best? posted Thu Oct 9 2008 19:48:47 by 747400sp
Airliners 2008 posted Tue Jun 17 2008 21:11:06 by WidgetBoi
Ugliest Livery Of Today´s Airlines posted Sun Apr 13 2008 01:07:35 by Columba
Big Airliners Or Small Airliners? posted Mon Mar 3 2008 08:31:51 by StarAlliance38
Airliners Soon To Become Endangered Species posted Mon Jan 21 2008 02:48:45 by Cchan
Which Is The Ugliest Livery? posted Thu Dec 13 2007 11:26:28 by B747forever
Airliners.net Best Airlines World Award posted Tue Nov 27 2007 14:02:28 by AF Cabin Crew
Top 10 Ugliest Commercial Airplanes Ever posted Sun Nov 11 2007 21:22:34 by PlateMan