Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What To Choose: Fly Narrow Or Wide-body Aircrafts?  
User currently offlineGearDownPlease From Switzerland, joined May 2007, 43 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 6973 times:

Hello all,

Let's make it short : let's imagine that I'm about to realise my dream => become an airline pilot BUT, right from the beginning (training), I'm asked to choose between a narrow-body network (A320 range) or wide-body network (A330/A340 range/MD-11?).

When it comes to being a job, what are the benefits/inconveniences of flying on a narrow-body or wide-body network ? I would assume the narrow-body network to be more stressfull because of the numerous short flights done in one day while the wide-body network would appear to be more tiring because of the time-lag.

These are only assumptions  laughing , I've indeed never had the chance to speak with a pilot about these questions, therefore the "naive"  innocent  tone of my post...

Thank you in advance for your ideas.

Regards, Stéphane


CItro�«n SM ? Sa Majest�© !
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA300605R From Germany, joined Nov 2005, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6967 times:

I guess Wilco737 could answer that question very well...

WILCO....

 wave 



300 319 320 321 332 733 734 735 738 753 763 F27 M83
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 6931 times:

Hi!

I can tell you my experience. I was very sceptical regarding flights over the Atlantic on a narrow-body jet until I had to fly CO from LIS to EWR. Actually I had a great flight, quite confortable in a 757-200ER!!! But....I think, if I can, I would always direct my bookings to a wide-body airplane...and if I can choose those ones that I've never flew even better! I have a "special affection" for the 767....I really had one of the most confortable rides in my life in one 767-300!!! I'll never forget that day, it was really special, we came on a red-eye flight from LAX to JFK with UA, we arrived JFK 7:00 AM went to Manhattan with my wife and my 2 boys ( at that time...now I have an "extra girl"!!! ), visited Empire State, Statue of Liberty and the Twin Towers, went back to JFK and flew to LGW with BA and that wonderful 767-336ER G-BNWR with "Chelsea Rose" livery! I remember that before we boarded we saw with our kids a BA Concorde so close to us and an old 747-136, G-AWNB that I think it was doing the very last flight before it was WFU! 4 Days latter still recovering from our long trip we saw the news that a SR MD11 had crashed almost in the same path we flew a few days earlier...and we felt very, very bad!
Regards


User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17148 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6920 times:



Quoting A300605R (Reply 1):
guess Wilco737 could answer that question very well...

That is true, he first flew the 737s, and now MD11s. Think he will go back in a few year to narrow body a/cs!!!



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3135 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 6906 times:

I would avoid narrowbodies given the choice, which is actually quite easy living on the West Coast. Given that most smaller cities in Europe require one stop from SEA, I'd rather fly to AMS, FRA, CDG, CPH, or LHR and then take a short hop. To me that beats a long 757 flight to NYC, followed by a long 757 flight to Europe any day.

I prefer the widebodies, especially A330 and 767 since in economy there's fewer middle seats, much more overhead space, more room to walk around (and hang out for a few minutes), and faster boarding/de-boarding.


User currently offlineBok269 From United States of America, joined May 2007, 2104 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6899 times:



Quoting RwSEA (Reply 4):



Quoting CV990 (Reply 2):

I think he's asking from a pilot's perspective.

Keep in mind that virtually all airlines are seniority-based. The actual pilots on the boards can probably elaborate on what this means better than I can.



"Reality is wrong, dreams are for real." -Tupac
User currently offlineAg92 From India, joined Jul 2006, 1317 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 6872 times:



Quoting Bok269 (Reply 5):

I think he's asking from a pilot's perspective.

Thats what I thought as well

I am NOT a pilot but I suppose flying narrow-bodies you get to see your family more often?


User currently offlineGearDownPlease From Switzerland, joined May 2007, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6851 times:



Quoting Bok269 (Reply 5):
I think he's asking from a pilot's perspective.



Quoting Ag92 (Reply 6):
Thats what I thought as well

Hi, got it, I was indeed interested in the "pilot's" perspective.

Quoting Bok269 (Reply 5):
The actual pilots on the boards can probably elaborate on what this means better than I can.

That's what I was hoping for but, actually, I am pleased reading all posts.

Quoting Ag92 (Reply 6):
I suppose flying narrow-bodies you get to see your family more often?

You got it, I am slowly leaning on the narrow-body network side, because of my friend and maybe because I hear often that flying on a narrow-body network basis is actually more exciting. Once again, these are only assumptions.

Thanks anyway.

Regards, Stéphane



CItro�«n SM ? Sa Majest�© !
User currently offlineGearDownPlease From Switzerland, joined May 2007, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months ago) and read 6742 times:

Hmmm, no pilots available to give their point of views ? Please please...


CItro�«n SM ? Sa Majest�© !
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9118 posts, RR: 76
Reply 9, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 6740 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting A300605R (Reply 1):
I guess Wilco737 could answer that question very well...

Roger will do Big grin

Quoting GearDownPlease (Thread starter):
When it comes to being a job, what are the benefits/inconveniences of flying on a narrow-body or wide-body network ?

I will keep it short as well! on the 737 (where I have been) you do a lot of actually flying! Up to 5 flights a day, many take offs and landings, always stress to stay in your schedule, short ground times, delays, flying faster thus louder in the cockpit, nice stopovers in familar aeras, SHORT layovers, sometimes only 12 hours (who needs sleep) ?

Long haul in a wide body. Now I am flying MD11Fs. Everything is a little slower... You wont touch anything of the paperwork until you have reached your cruising level, and you have a lot of time do prepare your approach and do all the papwerwork, you have enough time to eat, drink (NON alcohol of course Big grin), BUT on the other hand: LONG flights, jetlags, sleeping will be difficult sometimes, red eye flights, everything can get pretty much F***** up...

Airplanewise: Well, I LOVE the 737! It was so much fun flying with her! its a great airplane, small cockpit though. Long haul, bigger aircrafts, yeah, you can say HEAVY while talking to ATC, but who cares  Wink And you have a nice overview from up there when on the ground, in the air, nobody cares again  Wink

Oh and of course: FLying a big bird you get higher chances that A.net spotter actually point their camera at you! Big grin Big grin

I flew 3 years 737s and now roughly a year MD11Fs. I must say: I miss the FLYING! I am more traveling around the world, doing a landing every once in a while... As a beginning I would suggest: go short haul and learn all that stuff, I mean flying, landing, the operation etc etc... Once you are on long haul, you will get rusty automatically!
Oh, and in EVERY aircraft using a Flight director, there is a buttong to switch it off: DO it from time to time in order not to get too rusty too soon Big grin

I hope that helped you a bit making your decision...

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9272 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 6722 times:

I have only been on narrow bodies and regional aircraft. The biggest plane I was on was a 757. I would love to have an opportunity to take a widebody aircraft like the 767s, or even the really widebodies like the 777, 747, or A330-340


Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA Vs. HP/F9: What To Choose! posted Thu Mar 10 2005 03:44:11 by Pdxtriple7
Which One To Choose? AA, UA Or US? posted Sat Mar 5 2005 21:26:29 by CRFLY
What Is The Loudest Wide Body Jet You Ever Herd? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 19:36:42 by 747400sp
Transcon NYC To California, What To Fly? posted Sun Dec 11 2005 04:01:11 by Comorin
Which FF Program To Choose: BMI Or LH *A? posted Thu Oct 27 2005 18:08:04 by SNBru
Who To Choose Arkia Or Israir ATR Flight? posted Sat Jul 9 2005 21:37:01 by Elal106
To Choose UA Or LOT posted Sat Jun 11 2005 07:39:33 by Copenhagenboy
Your Choice To Fly, A B757 Or Anything Else? posted Wed Jan 12 2005 05:42:35 by Pilotntrng
Etihad Y Experience - What To Expect? posted Sun Jan 13 2008 13:35:00 by Aussie_
What To Do In FRA For 8 Hours posted Thu Jan 10 2008 04:29:40 by Treeny