Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aviation Crashes - "What Were You Thinking?!?  
User currently offlineRT514 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3158 times:

What air disaster (caused by crew error or poor judgment on the part of the crew) perplexes you the most?
In other words, If you could speak to the crew, to whom would you most want to say "What the f#*% we're you thinking?!?"

Some possibilities could be...

Aeroflot 593, where the captain allowed his children to handle the controls.

Northwest 255, where in a rush to depart, the takeoff checklist was never completed.

KLM 4805, where takeoff was attempted without proper clearance.

Singapore 006, where takeoff was attempted during a typhoon.

My vote goes to Aeroflot 593.

[Edited 2004-07-09 19:28:21]

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineFlymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7448 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3115 times:

Was there a crash when the flaps where not set. Maybe it was the NW one. How do you not set the flaps I dont understand?

"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offlineRT514 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3108 times:

NW 255 & DL 1141 were crashes as a result of the flaps not being configured for takeoff.

In the NW case, the crew was in a rush to get to their destination and the takeoff checklist was not completed.

In the DL case, the crew were engaged in non- flight related conversation. Although the checklist was done, it is surmised that it was a robotic response, as the flaps weren't configured correctly.

User currently offlineBMAbound From Sweden, joined Nov 2003, 660 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3103 times:

No pun intended, but having read quite a few NTSB reports, I dare say that the topic statement pertains to a great number of general aviation pilots. Continued flight into IMC, running out of fuel, break the nosewheel (in zero wind) and other intelligent stuff make for some great statistics.


Altitude is Insurance - Get Insured
User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5553 posts, RR: 43
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3087 times:

With regard to NW215 and DL1141, as with all crashes, the flaps not being set were the end of a long series of unusual circumstances. Also, in both cases, the "TakeOff Configuration Warning System was unserviceable in both cases". This system would have warned them when takeoff power was set.

I am unsure about American law today, but in Canada, this system must be serviceable before dispatch. NO exceptions.

Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineRoberta From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3080 times:

Aero Peru 757, Some dude tapes over the air pressure (i think) reader on the outside of the plane to give her a clean. Plane takes off, flies around and starts to get loads of crazy readings. Eventualy crashes into the sea (night-flight) because the computers were telling them it was too high, when it actually wasnt. That "dude" is now sitting in a prison cell in Lima.

User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2159 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3048 times:

Sounds like the static port. If that is closed, the ambient air is trapped and gives erroneous readings on the instruments.

Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 66
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

The Aero Peru flight did have the static ports taped over, but that is not the real cause of the crash.

The crash was caused by a non-instrument qualified pilot being at the controls.

Oh, he may have been instrument rated but he was not qualified. The plane was completely flyable. Basic pitch and power still work, people. The plane was flyable using the non-pitot static instruments. We do that sort of thing all the time in instrument training.

Same deal with the NW ferry flight a few years earlier that crashed because of probe heat being selected OFF. Basic pitch and power. If your rate of climb seems unbelievable, don't believe it.

Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Were You Doing On September 11th, 2001? posted Fri Feb 3 2006 03:44:10 by Longhornmaniac
What Were They Thinking? Failed Hubs. posted Sun Jun 12 2005 18:48:23 by BigGSFO
What # Were You In Line For Departure? posted Thu Jul 8 2004 17:07:05 by Njdevilsin03
What Got You Into Aviation? posted Fri Apr 21 2006 03:22:40 by Cadet57
What Made You Interested In Aviation posted Sat Apr 8 2006 09:03:04 by Boeing767mech
What Aviation Or Airplane Magazines Do You Read? posted Sat Feb 4 2006 00:59:41 by RoseFlyer
What Got You Interested In Aviation? posted Wed Feb 1 2006 00:30:17 by YoungFlyer
What Do You Appreciate In Aviation? posted Sat May 14 2005 08:22:46 by PilotNTrng
What Would You Do If You Were AA's CEO? posted Fri Jan 28 2005 20:43:11 by SHUPirate1
What Do You Look For In An Airline? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 09:32:50 by AirForceOne