RyDawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 870 posts, RR: 7 Posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 5582 times:
It's been years since I used to have access to Northwest's RADAR system for Non-Rev travel planning. I am trying to recall some of the unique search features that they had. Examples were the "Warm Weather Finder" and something that would look for flights booked under a certain percentage. Can anyone recall some of the other search options, or unique non-rev searches you have found on OAL's?
You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
Rivervisual From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 51 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 5528 times:
there's an adventure search which lets you find the destinations with the best availability in the next 45 days and the warm weather search which lets you search for cities with a temperature above whatever you choose.
Basic Availability Search
-From, To, Departure Date, Return Date
-Same as Basic Availability, except you can enter multiple airport codes (e.g., LGA/JFK/EWR to ORD/MDW)
-Show me all flights from XYZ on this date that are <=X% full
Warm Weather Search
-Show me all flights from XYZ on this date that are <=X% full and the destination is >=X degrees F
A bit off the subject, but are there any Internet tools that work similarly to these NWA non-rev tools for purchasing a ticket, i.e. are there any tools that you can say show me the flights to the destinations that have good availability (or low fares; whatever) from a certain airport for a given day? I know about kayak's weekend function, but I am thinking more of something where you can input a budget and the options are given. For instance, let's say I want to go somewhere for a weekend from Thursday to Sunday (or any specified number of days or dates) from MSP, and my budget for airfare was $500 per person. Where can I go for that? I had never really considered searching that way before, but it would be handy. Any thoughts are appreciated.