Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New UA Intl Premium Cabins..feedback?  
User currently offlineUAORD2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 266 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Recently flew ORD-CDG on the new 767 in Biz. LOVED it!!! Any other people experience it? What is the general feeling about it compared to AA Biz?

-J

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineScorpy From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 400 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

I was very satisifed. At 6'5" its long enough for me, so even if a little thin, it worked really well. Surprisingly, I liked it more than the SQ business class as the length was a problem there. (of course, the service, while better than i've had on some carries, was not nearly up to SQ standard)

User currently offlineTranspac787 From United States of America, joined exactly 7 years ago today! , 3193 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3521 times:



Quoting UAORD2000 (Thread starter):
What is the general feeling about it compared to AA Biz?

I've taken the UA new biz on SFO-KIX and KIX-SFO now, on the 747-400's. I really did enjoy it, especially the AVOD. Massive improvement over their old F and C.

AA though, I still really like. Despite not being a full lie-flat, it's still a fantastically comfortable seat. In addition to this, AA's on board service still seems drastically superior to UA's in both First and Business. So while UA's seats and entertainment were given a nice upgrade, their food service and quality could still stand to use a major face lift.



A340-500: 4 engines 4 long haul. 777-200LR: 2 engines 4 longer haul
User currently offlineUAORD2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 266 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3511 times:

Thanks Scorpy,

I am really interested in how it compares to AA. I think that SQ is in another league unfortunately.


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24870 posts, RR: 46
Reply 4, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3455 times:

As a frequent flyer on both, I give a major  bigthumbsup  to the new United international product. The seat is great and the IFE is a huge leap. The meals are what they are, however United has expressed plans spruce up the soft product up in the coming year. As I recall reading there have already been small changes with the appetizer and desert choices, and new chocolates in F class.

For AA, I believe they made what will eventually be seen as a mistake and lost the opportunity to go with a lie-flat product themselves now that the rest of the US majors are adopting such. While the AA seats is an improvement, its only a half hearted move while its competitors are in the process of leapfrogging them. On a personal note, one thumbs down on the AA seat, is the fact that I cant get my feet to quite fit under the seat in front of me when reclined unless if I angle them which can become uncomfortable after a bit.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineGabrielz From United States of America, joined May 2004, 74 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3341 times:

There's no comparison between a truly lie-flat seat and an angled-flat seat. Even if AA had 2x service and food compared to UA (and neither are truly grand - or consistent) I'd never switch for long-haul considering the vastly inferior seat.

In FC, an argument can be made that they are comparable (though UA's newness probably wins out).

-G


User currently offlineTranspac787 From United States of America, joined exactly 7 years ago today! , 3193 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3208 times:



Quoting Gabrielz (Reply 5):
(and neither are truly grand - or consistent)

Though AA's far more 'grand' than UA.

Quoting Gabrielz (Reply 5):
In FC, an argument can be made that they are comparable (though UA's newness probably wins out).

AA's still offer the swiveling seat, desk, etc. UA's new suites don't have any such feature.



A340-500: 4 engines 4 long haul. 777-200LR: 2 engines 4 longer haul
User currently offlineZKEOJ From New Zealand, joined Feb 2005, 1006 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (5 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3171 times:

I flew EZE-IAD on UAs B767 in C, and I really liked it. Only two minor things (apart from a meal service that was inferior to other carriers, but no way poor or bad...) were that the "bed" was a bit uncomfortable due to lumps and bumps in there, and the lack of personal storage space. Actually, there is NO storage at all (apart form the overhead lockers, of course, and a narrow flat "board" in the seat in front of you, but that is small and things slide off it. However, I can easily live with these shortcomings - I enjoyed the ride a lot!

As for AA - never had the pleasure to fly them in C  Sad

Cheers
micha


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA New Business Class Seating Pics? posted Tue Feb 26 2008 13:06:33 by Lesismore
UA New Business Class posted Thu Dec 6 2007 10:19:33 by Lesismore
Best Seat On UA Atlantic Intl 777 posted Thu Sep 27 2007 18:29:20 by SiouxATC
What New Aircraft Will UA Order posted Tue Sep 11 2007 22:21:56 by Jwb2
Air New Zealand Premium Economy? posted Wed Jan 17 2007 07:53:29 by 737DAB320
Which Premium Seats Are Better: UA Or AA? posted Wed Apr 6 2005 00:11:10 by Daron4000
Who Has Yet To See UA New Colors? posted Sun Jan 2 2005 00:42:27 by Dlx737200
New To Forum, Thoughts On UA Survival posted Wed Sep 1 2004 03:53:12 by NomoreRJs
New Colors UA 757 Coming To DEN On The 9th! posted Fri May 7 2004 02:58:45 by F9Widebody
UA New FA Uniform posted Thu Mar 14 2002 22:30:05 by Macmac76