Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
If Southwest Or Jetblue Had VIP Clubs....  
User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3181 posts, RR: 9
Posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4274 times:

Where would they be and would you join?


14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN623JB From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 703 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4214 times:

I would Join JetBlue's VIP Club if there were to be one.I think their clubs would be at their main focus cities and especially in JFK T5-their base of operations. I would join the club without any questions. Somethings that I would see in the club would be comfy leather couches, free drinks/snacks and other complimentary stuff as well.

[Edited 2009-09-11 17:29:40]


Bring JetBlue To Mexico City! (TLC and/or MEX would be great)
User currently offlineLexy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2515 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4187 times:

Well, WN's would almost all be located in their "Focus City's".

Places like MDW (x2), BWI, FLL (x2), DAL, HOU, LAX, BNA, PHX, STL, DEN, LAS (x2), MCO, etc. All of those host a large number of flights and "connections" a day. So with that, a club would probably work well in those airports.



Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3217 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4182 times:

SWA.... no way.

Jetblue is a possibility because they at least understand that a poloshirt is not an airline uniform. Image and presentation are important and being a LCC doesn't excuse that, as others such as Jetstar, Easyjet and Air Asia have shown. Jetblue makes some effort in this department, and as such I can see them being able to put together a successful lounge (Indeed fellow new world carrier Virginblue does have lounges, and they work well too!)

SWA on the other hand...I'm not sure they provide the sort of thing a person who pay's their own money to join a lounge would offer. They'd need to ditch the poloshirts in the lounge, pay for some contemporary furniture, and start offering a few things like decent wine. My guess would be SWA would conclude that this largely isn't their target market,(much the same as Tiger Airways, or Ryanair) and going to the trouble of adding some of those perks in a fashion that would be good enough to get people pay hundreds of dollars in membership fees would be against their business model and probably wouldn't have much of a business case. You've got to look at the primary market served and how they operate. For Jetblue I can see it working because NYC is their home. Lots of business types and even leisure types who'd pay and expect more. But the "mums and dad's" of Middle America?

That being said there are probably some routes where SWA, if they were to make some changes, could make these things work. I'm thinking the Triangle of the Texas cities where it all started for them, and Intra Californian shuttle type flights. Maybe they could 'rebrand' these flights to some kind of upgraded shuttle service and a lounge may work well just for these airports.


User currently offlineSANAV8R From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 215 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4160 times:

They would probably sell access when selling tickets. I know on some airlines there is an option to purchase lounge access when purchasing tickets (based on fare class), I could imagine WN would have something where if you purchase their BusinessSelect fare you could recieve/pay a small fee for the lounge. Obviously in some cases many of the airports they serve there might be difficulty in implementing a lounge but some places such as BWI would be perfect.

B6 would definitely have benefit from its frequent passengers. At Terminal 5 especially (one in Saarinen structure would be really cool).


User currently offlineKL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5204 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4149 times:



Quoting Zrs70 (Thread starter):
Where would they be and would you join?

Nah, don't care about lounges. Bars enough at airports where you can get a few beers before the flight, and people watching is more fun in a terminal then in a quiet lounge..


User currently onlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23148 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4119 times:



Quoting Lufthansa (Reply 3):
SWA on the other hand...I'm not sure they provide the sort of thing a person who pay's their own money to join a lounge would offer.

Are you arguing that the business people who fly WN are not the sort of people who would pay for lounge access?



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3217 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4116 times:



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 6):
Are you arguing that the business people who fly WN are not the sort of people who would pay for lounge access

Not at all. They would pay. But SWA has a very vast network built on lots of O& D traffic, and that model works on primarily flying mums and dads and grandma once a year. SWA definately carriers business PAX on these routes without question. I'd say particularly owners of small businesss who have to pay for it out of their own pocket, however in order to make a business case for a lounge, you're going to need critical mass of these people. That business case is going to need to be made either two ways. Firstly, SWA generates significantly more traffic high yeilding by incurring the cost of the lounge at key airports such as lax (that case will never stack up at plenty of the 'spoke' airports) or that that they can succesfully sell enough memeberships to cover the cost of construction, operation and make a small profit. My arguement is that the mix of SWA traffic, and SWA's target customer means that business case doesn't stack up. If SWA had different focus, and actively targeted a higher percentage of business pax rather then just those wanting value for money to get from A to B, i'd say things might be different but their successful business model wasn't built on that. Jetblue on the other hand in NYC is in a very different position.


User currently onlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23148 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4094 times:



Quoting Lufthansa (Reply 7):
Firstly, SWA generates significantly more traffic high yeilding by incurring the cost of the lounge at key airports such as lax (that case will never stack up at plenty of the 'spoke' airports) or that that they can succesfully sell enough memeberships to cover the cost of construction, operation and make a small profit. My arguement is that the mix of SWA traffic, and SWA's target customer means that business case doesn't stack up.

I don't think anyone is arguing that WN could, would, or should build lounges at all 68 stations. No airline does that. But if you compare the number of business passengers flying WN at, say, STL with the number who fly US at, say, GSO or BDL, I think you'd find that the critical mass is present at some larger stations, and most of those stations do see some connections.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3217 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4029 times:



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 8):
But if you compare the number of business passengers flying WN at, say, STL with the number who fly US at, say, GSO or BDL, I think you'd find that the critical mass is present at some larger stations, and most of those stations do see some connections

But is there a business case? Will, buy building lounges at those airports either (1) - increase the number of higher yeilding pax, or (2) those existing business pax, will they pay a sufficient amount in memberships to cover the cost of contruction and operation and then allow for a small profit on top. You see, SWA already has their business without the need to provide this facility and they're not really at any threat of losing it. Chasing big corporate contracts is another issue altogether. The questions is, not if those existing business PAX would like that. I'm sure they would. I just dont see their being a business case to invest that money.

Now if SWA started chasing big corporate accounts I'd say they'd need those lounges on strategic grounds to go and get them... but they'd also need intercontinental flights. That's not their business model.


User currently onlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23148 posts, RR: 20
Reply 10, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4003 times:



Quoting Lufthansa (Reply 9):
You see, SWA already has their business without the need to provide this facility and they're not really at any threat of losing it. Chasing big corporate contracts is another issue altogether.

I'm not sure corporate contracts really drive lounge choice, at least in this country. Certainly, many business travelers choose to pay for lounge access and either pay out of their own pocket or are reimbursed.

That critical mass is present at some WN stations. If WN would sell enough memberships to cover the costs and make a little money on top, there's no reason they shouldn't do it. That's basically the model other airlines use.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5694 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (5 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3984 times:

The only reason I'd see WN building an actual lounge, in WN has already built a business area so to speak.

Business Chairs to relax and work on your laptop, as well tables to charge your laptop, and there are TV's around usually to help cater to it and whatnot. So WN in a way has already started the process.

If they really wanted to, and enclose it so you had to pay to enter or have elite status (Business Select and A Listers) to enter, it could be possible.

Is now the time for that to happen? Not sure, but it seems to be the direction WN is going.

Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Usair, America West, Southwest, Or Delta Into Las posted Fri Nov 4 2005 14:12:39 by Garri767
Southwest Or Allegiant? posted Sun Oct 9 2005 23:03:01 by Frontiercpt
AirTran, Southwest, Or AA/US? posted Thu Jul 28 2005 16:10:05 by NWADC9
LAX To D.C Southwest Or IndyAir? posted Tue Jul 12 2005 10:54:47 by AirWillie6475
If The MD-11 Had Been As Successful As... posted Mon May 2 2005 14:46:54 by Tockeyhockey
Jetblue Or Southwest? posted Sat Dec 17 2005 20:04:58 by Mcofreak
DL F: Which If Better 752 Or 763 posted Mon Nov 3 2008 20:38:29 by JerseyGuy
B6 (JetBlue) Or VX (Virgin America) posted Fri Jan 4 2008 21:29:19 by ANITIX87
Low-Cost Airlines: Southwest VS Virgin VS JetBlue posted Tue Sep 25 2007 14:48:24 by AA7295
The Sonicruiser If 9/11 Had Not Happen posted Tue Sep 11 2007 23:47:22 by 747400sp