Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
My First Flight To NRT From JFK - AA Or Delta?  
User currently offlineGolftango From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 314 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9724 times:

So I am booking my first flight to Japan and I am trying to decide on which of the two flights/carriers:

AA

JFK 11:35am – NRT 2:30pm (13h 55m) – 777 service
NRT 6pm – JFK 6:05pm (13h 5m) – 777 service


Delta

JFK 1:10pm – NRT 5pm (14h 50m) – 777 service
NRT 3:15p – JFK 3:35p (13h 20m) – 777 service

Which carrier has the better 777 equipment as far as comfort/amenities goes? And why does Delta add a whole hour on their west bound leg?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePI4EVER From United States of America, joined May 2009, 675 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9722 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would no doubt vote AA for their JFK terminal in comparison to DL; however, for overall flight experience....seat comfort, entertainment, food and beverage and people service I'd fly DL without question.
Flight times are probably "padded" as is routine/custom for flights departing from JFK during a period of "push". My JFK-LHR flight was 90 minutes late but we arrived LHR 5 minutes early....in fact, we held at JFK an additional 20 mins to insure we didn't arrive LHR early!
Let us know who you choose and why.
Thomas



watch what you want. you may get it.
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 2, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9720 times:

I'd vote for the Japanese carriers - ANA particular with its new 77W, but JAL is pretty good also.


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineGolftango From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 314 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9715 times:



Quoting LAXintl (Reply 2):
I'd vote for the Japanese carriers - ANA particular with its new 77W, but JAL is pretty good also.

I agree, but Delta and AA are $827 R/T vs. ANA's $1500


User currently offlineBOACCunard From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 864 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9639 times:

Hardware-wise the main difference I can think of is that DL has 3-3-3 seating and AA is 2-5-2. AA's arrangement is better if you can get one of those rows of 2; DL's is better otherwise. The seats themselves are about the same, though the DL ones are leather and have adjustable lumbar support. (I hate the leather on long-haul aircraft!) They both have adjustable headrests.

Soft product ... well it's Y, and on US carriers at that, so don't expect anything spectacular. But DL has menus, amenity kits and free beer and wine if you care about any of that. On transatlantic flights the food is usually better on DL, but I haven't flown JFK-NRT so I can't attest to the food service on this particular route. (It's longer than my usual JFK-Europe.)

Both have full AVOD, so IFE is a dead heat.

So overall, soft product goes to DL, hard product could swing either way depending on what seats are open.

Then there is the matter of on-the-ground experience. I don't know anything about NRT but as far as JFK is concerned, AA is infinitely better. AA's T8 is one of the best facilities in the US and DL's T3 is one of the worst. Clearing immigration at T3 is hellish.

For me it would depend on what seats I could reserve on AA, if I had to be in that row of 5 seats that would make me choose DL, if not I would go with AA for the opposite reason - being in a row of 2 is better than 3. If you ignore the seating I'd probably choose AA to avoid T3, but you might prefer DL's slightly more refined soft product. AA is very bare-bones on the soft product, DL tries a little harder to match foreign competitors' standards.

I assume miles are not a concern for you otherwise you wouldn't be asking this.  Wink



Getting There is Half the Fun!
User currently offlineGolftango From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 314 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 9581 times:

Well, thanks everyone for their insight. We chose AA based on the departure and arrival times. Also, the 2-5-2 seating was preferred for the wife and I.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
First Class To SYD From London posted Tue May 26 2009 12:51:34 by Readytotaxi
Inbound To LHR From JFK Late 70's posted Wed Jan 2 2008 09:26:33 by Readytotaxi
How To Get From JFK To EWR...FAST? posted Fri Oct 26 2007 17:17:34 by LX64A332
Which Airline To SFO [From IAH/HOU Or AUS]? posted Wed Oct 3 2007 02:48:15 by JetBlueAUS
Best Way To Go From JFK To Newark? posted Wed Aug 15 2007 04:32:39 by Tonytifao
My First Flight On A BAe 146 posted Mon Jul 23 2007 10:59:16 by Ogre727
My First Trip To Europe (AMS)...who To Fly? posted Mon Mar 5 2007 22:30:58 by United319
Flying From JFK-Ath On Delta posted Mon Mar 5 2007 06:19:49 by Bucks918
My First Flight In A Cessna posted Sat Oct 21 2006 23:15:48 by JWMD123
Just Booked My First Flight On CO posted Fri Dec 9 2005 23:17:58 by Venezuela747