Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Hardest Commercial Airport To Reach In The World  
User currently offlineinitious From Singapore, joined Dec 2008, 1065 posts, RR: 15
Posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 9875 times:

I'm sure most of our a.netters are familiar with the famous Kai Tak Approach. Despite being breathtaking, I'm sure it is not the hardest airport to reach in the world. Any ideas which airport in the world is the hardest to reach?

According to Wikipedia (I know, might not be accurate), it says that Nyingchi Airport (IATA: LZY, ICAO: ZUNZ) in Tibet, China is the hardest to reach. Here's an extract from the article

Quoting Wikipedia:
Known as 'the world's most difficult airport for planes to reach', Nyingchi Airport is situated in the valley of Yarlung Zangbo River in the Southeast of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, surrounded by over 4000-meter high mountains enveloped by clouds and fogs throughout the year. Planes have to fly through the narrow and winding river valley. The narrowest flight path is less than 4 kilometers from one mountain ridge along the valley to the opposite one. According to meteorological data, there are just 100 days overall that are airworthy in the airport each year.


Air China is the sole carrier operating to this airport. Hoping to find some pictures on this site and Google but to no avail, hoping someone can provide a clearer view of how this airport's approach is like. 4 kilometers of space between each mountain ridge does seem dangerous, imagine a strong wind and you look like you are going to hit the mountains soon. If someone could provide information on which aircraft type(s) are being used by CA to this airport, the runway length and the wind conditions, it is much appreciated. =D

Another airport I can think of is Paro Airport (IATA: PBH, ICAO: VQPR) in Bhutan. Only 8 pilots are certified to land at this airport. Similarly, only Drukair operates to this airport with a pair of Airbus A319s. Planes have to climb / descent very steeply to avoid the mountains when taking off or landing in either way. With a single runway of 1985m, it leaves little room for error here.

Therefore, which airport do you think is the hardest to reach in the world and why? (Commercial Airports only please!!)


One way I will fly around the world!
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinepeanuts From Netherlands, joined Dec 2009, 1438 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9867 times:

I would go with SAB and TGU (Tegucigalpa, Honduras). Check YouTube.

Why? Obstacles. Mountains and Water. The shortness of the runways is just for kicks...  Smile



[Edited 2010-03-05 11:26:05]


Question Conventional Wisdom. While not all commonly held beliefs are wrong…all should be questioned.
User currently offlinesw733 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6324 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9813 times:

Quoting initious (Thread starter):
Kai Tak
Quoting initious (Thread starter):
Despite being breathtaking, I'm sure it is not the hardest airport to reach in the world.

Well it is now...


User currently offlineinitious From Singapore, joined Dec 2008, 1065 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9813 times:

Quoting peanuts (Reply 1):
I would go with SAB and TGU (Tegucigalpa, Honduras). Check YouTube.

I definitely agree with SAB. Your precision has to be great to touch down perfectly at this airport. A little below means you crash into the cliff, a little later means your plane will go for a swim in the sea with you. =P



One way I will fly around the world!
User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9709 times:

Interesting thread.

Here's a video...

Pato Approach

Would be even better to see a cockpit view.

The turn onto the final is never fun so TGU - as mentioned - has to be up there.

Tegucigalpa Approach


User currently offlineinitious From Singapore, joined Dec 2008, 1065 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9590 times:

Both approaches were great, but the Paro approach was not as spectacular as I thought it will be. When I was trying it out in a simulator (those used by airline pilots), the pilot actually instructed me to put at much as 8-10 deg nose down for the final approach.

As for the TGU approach, it's truly great, not much to say.



One way I will fly around the world!
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17513 posts, RR: 45
Reply 6, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9472 times:

Hardest to reach or most difficult landing?


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineinitious From Singapore, joined Dec 2008, 1065 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9412 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 6):
Hardest to reach or most difficult landing?

I guess probably you thought my topic meant "Hardest to reach by land"?

However in this topic both will be similar as most difficult landing will mean that the pilot has to fly the plane more precisely in order to reach the airport. Correct me if I'm wrong. =)



One way I will fly around the world!
User currently offlineFLY2LIM From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1184 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9373 times:

The approach into Cuzco, and the takeoff are pretty harrowing as well. The approach (I'm not a pilot) cannot be made coming from a straight direction. Instead, you have to turn between two mountains to line up with the runway. The takeoff, likewise, requires a quick climb in circular motion in order to clear the mountains.

FLY2LIM



Faucett. La primera linea aerea del Peru.
User currently onlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6876 posts, RR: 75
Reply 9, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9091 times:

Try...
WAMENA/WAJW/WMX in Indonesian Papua.
It's almost 5100ft high, with only 5440ft of runway... VFR only, often closed due to weather, and is the cargo hub of the surrounding regions... It is inaccessible by land from other parts of the province... and everything needs to be carried in and out by air. Nice 300ft hills just next to one end of the runway, and is in a valley with mountains coming up to the 10kft - 15kft range. Steep slopes, and literally no navaids (except for one low power NDB) will be received by your plane until you reach about 12,000ft...

Most of the planes going in and out of there are missionary flights and Twotters hauling cargo and some pax to and from the isolated surrounding valleys, and cargo props (An-12, C130s, C160s, An24/26s), some jets (BAe146 combi, freighter... no pure pax jets... and 733F (a totally crazy idea seeing the surrounding terrain) ).

The airports in that area are just bloody crazy... and if you have an accident along the way, don't expect to be found within a day or two! If you have an accident and you block one of the smaller destinations and they can't move the plane off the strip... the town dies of starvation! Nice!

Lots of "1 way in only airports in a narrow valley" in the area... and lots of accidents due to the difficulty of the operating environment !

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineFly2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9038 times:

Quoting RJ111 (Reply 4):
Would be even better to see a cockpit view.

Ask and you shall receive...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlKApjc9T2U

I agree with all the airports mentioned so far.


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11655 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 8991 times:

I'd say FAE in the Faroes should also rank pretty high up the list. 1,250m runway with high terrain all around and snow/ice, yet they operate year around with BAe-146s/RJs and 737s from time to time. Not a great number of diversionary airports to chose from either!


...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 8980 times:

Quoting Fly2HMO (Reply 10):
Quoting RJ111 (Reply 4):
Would be even better to see a cockpit view.

Ask and you shall receive...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlKApjc9T2U

I agree with all the airports mentioned so far.

Fantastic, thanks, and yes it does look tricky. I would love to have a go at flying in there.

I bet a go-around takes ages.

[Edited 2010-03-05 13:46:03]

User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 8972 times:

The River Visual to Runway 19 in DCA is up there. I've done that one in the MD-88 at DL Headquarters. That was fun.  

User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 8972 times:

Seems flights to PBH are VFR too!

User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25371 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8929 times:

Another airport where you don't want to be too low on final approach. Avianca Fokker 100 landing at Pasto (PSO) in southern Colombia, not far from the Peruvian border.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0H8D3XLG6I


User currently offlineB777LRF From Luxembourg, joined Nov 2008, 1361 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 8909 times:

The Courcheval altiport is not for the faint hearted either. Used to have DH-7 service, don't know if that's the case anymore. But my money would be on Lhasa in Tibet, and yes you can get there commercially on a DH-6. One way in, one way out. PNR is some 10 miles from finals. Scary doesn't half cover it!


From receips and radials over straight pipes to big fans - been there, done that, got the hearing defects to prove
User currently offlinedanfearn77 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2008, 1813 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 8826 times:

Quoting RJ111 (Reply 4):
The turn onto the final is never fun so TGU - as mentioned - has to be up there.

Tegucigalpa Approach
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_z5HtME9n8&feature=related

Great video



Eagles may soar high, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines!
User currently offlineFN1001 From Moldova, joined Sep 2008, 234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 8710 times:

Hard to reach? Frankfurt Haahn!

From FRA you have to change several highways, usually with traffic jam, and the last kilometers are horrible. Not train connection, a poor bus service...



Mai bine să-ţi fie rău decît să-ţi pară rău.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Who Has The Best Airport Lounge In The World posted Wed Oct 29 2008 23:25:42 by DJMEL
AMS - Best Airport In The World! posted Wed Oct 18 2006 15:52:19 by RicardoFG
Largest Airport Terminal In The World posted Wed Sep 6 2006 20:27:54 by Naritaflyer
Is GEG The Worst Airport In The World? posted Wed May 31 2006 22:58:14 by Tockeyhockey
Ugliest Airport In The World? posted Sat Jan 1 2005 21:42:36 by XJRamper
Best Airport In The World? posted Tue Dec 7 2004 16:14:49 by Thegregster
What's The Airport With Most Runways In The World? posted Sat May 8 2004 00:33:18 by Eduardo Lepe
Longest Grass Runway In The World? posted Wed Feb 10 2010 11:15:36 by KDTWFlyer
DEL - Worst In The World? posted Sat Jan 30 2010 20:28:47 by QF744FAN
Best First Lounge In The World? posted Sat Jan 9 2010 21:51:09 by Alotoairlines