seabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 4277 posts, RR: 4 Reply 3, posted (2 years 11 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 6912 times:
Of major airlines, only JAL flies 762As anymore, and those 3 frames will be gone soon (if they aren't already).
Most 762As are stored. Most of those still in service have been converted to cargo. Except for JAL's, the few passenger examples left in service are flying for smaller operators, many in out-of-the-way places.
The HGW 752 basically made the 762A obsolete.
Edit: Looks like all 3 of JAL's 762As are now stored. So there are no major airlines left operating the type.
[Edited 2010-06-21 12:47:48]
Most gorgeous aircraft: Tu-204-300, 757-200, A330-200, 777-200LR, 787-8
American 767 From United States of America, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 3320 posts, RR: 14 Reply 4, posted (2 years 11 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 6677 times:
No American doesn't have any original 200 variant anymore. They had at one time a total of 30 762's including 8 non ER's which were delivered in the early to mid 80's, the rest were ER variants. The ER's were delivered in the mid to late 80's.
All of the original non ER's along with 4 ER's were parked in Roswell NM, the oldest two airframes N301AA and N302AA have been scrapped for good.
One of the ER variants was lost 9-11 when it was flying BOS-LAX as AA 011, another one was damaged beyond economical repair in LAX during the summer of 2006.
American is now left with 15 or 16 200ER's which are flown mostly on JFK-LAX and JFK-SFO transcon flights, as well as one daily JFK-MIA. Those are likely to stay a few more years, at least till the first few 787's are delivered.
CRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2079 posts, RR: 1 Reply 6, posted (2 years 11 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 6400 times:
A pity the 767-200 is "already outdated". I flew Braathens SAFE's 242-seat 762 in the 1980s, great aircraft and a config ahead of its time.
Wonder if a 242-seat 762 would be an economical option for LCC carriers on longer routes? Braathens SAFE's aircraft had a range of 6,500 km apparently...
mogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (2 years 11 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 6334 times:
will be challenging
u can't stuff it to the brink with 8-abreast, its engines are gas-guzzlers, and 7-abreast twin-aisle is the most volume wasting configuration possible
Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 6): Wonder if a 242-seat 762 would be an economical option for LCC carriers on longer routes? Braathens SAFE's aircraft had a range of 6,500 km apparently...
seabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 4277 posts, RR: 4 Reply 8, posted (2 years 11 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5997 times:
Quoting oly720man (Reply 5): Looking through the photos here, the only PAX one seems to be with Air Gabon
It looks like there are active individual frames with operators in the US (Vision), Jordan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia. I don't know which (if any) of these frames are actually in service.
Most gorgeous aircraft: Tu-204-300, 757-200, A330-200, 777-200LR, 787-8
ua777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 13 Reply 10, posted (2 years 11 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5353 times:
kgaiflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 3639 posts, RR: 1 Reply 14, posted (2 years 11 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4999 times:
Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 6): A pity the 767-200 is "already outdated". I flew Braathens SAFE's 242-seat 762 in the 1980s, great aircraft and a config ahead of its time.
Braathen's two airframes were unique in every way -- including decor.
kgaiflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 3639 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (2 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3319 times:
c5load From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 917 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (2 years 11 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3281 times:
Quoting American 767 (Reply 4): American is now left with 15 or 16 200ER's which are flown mostly on JFK-LAX and JFK-SFO transcon flights, as well as one daily JFK-MIA.
Why doesn't AA use them on TATL legs like CO does? Are there different variants of the -ER as well? Are the ones AA flies not HGW and CO's is?
"But this airplane has 4 engines, it's an entirely different kind of flying! Altogether"
TOMMY767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6171 posts, RR: 9 Reply 19, posted (2 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3267 times:
Quoting c5load (Reply 18): Why doesn't AA use them on TATL legs like CO does? Are there different variants of the -ER as well? Are the ones AA flies not HGW and CO's is?
Not since the early 2000s. IIRC, JFK-LHR at one point was flown on 762s, as well as EWR-LHR. Other interesting AA TATL 762 routes included the very pre-9/11 ORD-ARN. CO is still king in this respect.
Anyone recall the last AA 762A routes? I remember BOS-MCO was flown with one in 2001.
"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
debonair From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 2096 posts, RR: 4 Reply 20, posted (2 years 11 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3252 times:
Quoting LY777 (Thread starter): Which airlines still fly the 767-200 non ER?
Salut LY777!
B767-200 NON ER:
1. VISION AIRLINES USA
2. GABON AIRLINES
3. KAM AIR
4. Royal Falcon
-S7-ILF of AIR SEYCHELLES is reported to be a re-config. ER version. Dlvd. as B767-205 to BRAATHENS, but at least changed to -ER status during ops for Maxjet! Can anybody confirm?
Quoting ua777222 (Reply 10): That appears to be it for active 762s with the exception of private/government builds.
There are many airlines with B762 around, but unfortunately -ER version's.