Pe@rson From United Kingdom (England), joined Jan 2001, 16721 posts, RR: 58 Posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1061 times:
If you were a commerical pilot, which of the following would you prefer? Please note that this is just for fun and so don't consider pay or things like that.
Would you prefer to:
1) Fly a small aircraft (a regional jet or a prop) into big airports; or
2) Fly a medium/big aircraft into small airports.
THOSE ARE THE ONLY OPTIONS!
I would certainly prefer 2), as I'd find it exciting flying, say, a 738 into small airports much more exciting than being just another plane at a big airport.
XJRamper From United States, joined Dec 2003, 2087 posts, RR: 54 Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1013 times:
I would choose option #2 cause a couple of years ago when NW had a few of their 747-2/400 in there as well as a DC-10 and a handful of 757s and the DC-9s. That would have been fun flying into TOL in those aircraft than my little C172...heavy
MD11LuxuryLinr From United States, joined Jul 2003, 1385 posts, RR: 26 Reply 4, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 964 times:
Yep.. Option 2 for me also. Sounds more exciting, of course. I can only imagine the thrill of being behind the controls of an aluminum titanic and flying it into a facility that wasn't necessarily designed for it. Short runways, mountainous terrains, reef runways.. Plus, the attention received because its one of the biggest aircraft around..
Caution wake turbulence, you are following a heavy jet.
SK973 From Sweden, joined Mar 2004, 327 posts, RR: 9 Reply 5, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 918 times:
Definately Option #2 for me after being a passenger on a full Thai A300-600 landing at the small airport of Hat-Yai where it seemed arrestor hooks might be needed to stop the plane from overrunning! LOL
Pe@rson From United Kingdom (England), joined Jan 2001, 16721 posts, RR: 58 Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 879 times:
I'll let you have that, FJWH, as English isn't your first language, so I wasn't really expecting you to understand the warning: "THESE ARE THE ONLY OPTIONS." LOL. Just kidding.
WakeTurbulence From United States, joined Apr 2004, 1170 posts, RR: 22 Reply 9, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 806 times:
For sure option 2. I love watching a/c come into SNA and BUR all the time. It looks so exciting, even though it probably isn't that much different from a larger airport. Still looks fun though.
-Matt
MD11lover From Switzerland, joined Oct 2003, 444 posts, RR: 1 Reply 19, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 450 times:
I really like the thought of both options. I always think it would be neat to fly a UA Express Brasilia into SFO, but yet again, how about flying a 330 into RTB? Eurofly operates flights from Italy to RTB during the summer. The airport is practically on an island and all the other a/c are ATRs, Let, Otters..etc.
Kennedy1 From United States, joined Jul 2004, 76 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 437 times:
I'd choose something like a BBJ just for the bizjet factor into a smaller airport. Small town people are usually very interested in bizjets and catch a lot of attention. To people who see old single piston planes all day, a 737 BBJ is going to be big to them!
Sponsor Message: 
.gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (England), joined Jan 2001, 16721 posts, 
From United States, joined Dec 2003, 2087 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Mar 2004, 327 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined May 2004, 956 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1198 posts, 
.
From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1031 posts, 
From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3207 posts, 
From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 6455 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Oct 2003, 444 posts, 
From Austria, joined Sep 2004, 1693 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
