Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Comparing The Narrowbodies  
User currently offlinenycdave From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 547 posts, RR: 1
Posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2153 times:

Okay, I'm kind of new here, and it's a bit daunting to go through the reams and reams of old threads that descend into vague assertions and personal aspersions about whether the 737 or A320 series is better, and in what regards.

So, how about educating a fella as to the pros and cons of each in terms of design and engineering? None of that stuff about "I like the feel" or "x is so much more graceful and nice to look at". In terms of operations, design, reliability, flexibility, that sort of stuff... give me your pros and cons of each!

And heck, throw in the E-Jets and C-series if you like... though do A and B really even compete in that field any more? Other than the A318 and 736, neither of which are big sellers, have they pretty much conceded that market to Embraer, Bombadier, and some of the prospective newcomers?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 47
Reply 1, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2119 times:

I am not sure what you are looking for but here's what I posted on another thread:

Here's what I could find from Boeing and Airbus sites, along with actual airline seat configuration:

.................................................................Boeing 738.............................A320
Max. 1-class Seats........... ...........................189......................................180
Maximum Takeoff Weight .......................174,200 lb(winglets)...............171,960 lb(option)
OEW......................................................91,300 lb...............................93,920 lb
Max. Structural Payload...........................47,000 lb...............................43,860 lb
Basic Dimensions
Overall Length ............................................129 ft 6 in ................................123 ft 3 in
Cabin length......................................................?..........................................90 ft 3 in
Interior Cabin Width ......................................11 ft 7 in...................................12 ft 1 in

They seem fairly close on most metrics, with B738 being slightly lighter, and has a higher max. passenger capacity, which may be important for LCCs. SpiceJet has configured its B738 at 189Y, and Indigo has configured its A320 at 180Y.

I have no clue on fuel burn performance. Hopefully, someone can provide a comparison. Similarly, any info. on list prices and discounts will be helpful.


User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 7022 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

The best comparison is the sales figures, and those show that they are about as close to equal as two different aircraft can be. I have seen various comparisons showing that one may be slightly better than the other for some tasks, and the other better for others. But the bottom line is that both are holding their own in the marketplace, and very few operators are ditching one for the other, either way. On the used/lease market the 737 seems to bring slightly higher prices for the same age and condition aircraft, but not by a significant margin. Anyone who tries to say that one or the other has a significant advantage is just blowing smoke. This is of course referring to current production; the A320NEO will probably upset the applecart. Boeing will be forced to launch their own NEO or new aircraft to stay in contention. You will hear a lot about the 737 being a "40 year old design"; well, the wheel is a 6,000 year old design and we're still using it. The 737NG is updated in all areas that are really significant; the fact that the shell is based on the 40 year old design does not detract from the fact that it is a very capable and competitive aircraft.


The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA664/973: Is The 747 Off For Good? posted Tue Dec 14 2010 23:42:49 by cactus742
Have You Ridden Aboard The Alphabet? posted Sat Dec 11 2010 20:45:56 by Airstud
The Best Spotting Locations posted Sat Dec 11 2010 06:00:36 by Sketty222
Joining A Frequent F. Club Just For The Card? posted Fri Dec 10 2010 19:03:33 by JetBlue777
Icelandair.. Worth The Discount? posted Thu Dec 9 2010 16:10:38 by Flinhion757
Caught The FA Taking Shots In The Galley! posted Tue Dec 7 2010 21:04:44 by UAL747DEN
Have You Landed On The Alphabet? 2010 Edition posted Tue Dec 7 2010 09:53:47 by CrimsonNL
Anyone Know The Story On AAL1925 This Evening? posted Sun Dec 5 2010 19:30:43 by LuisKMIA
What Tpac Product Is The Best To KIX From The US? posted Sun Dec 5 2010 15:20:56 by 787PDX
The Beutiful Aircarft Of Pilatus, The PC-12. posted Sat Dec 4 2010 15:31:50 by Poadrim