Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airlines Of The Future: 2011-2020  
User currently offlinec5load From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 917 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 12570 times:

A thread discusses the airlines that appeared and disappeared during the 2000s. What about the future? Will we see two of the biggest airlines head to head by 2020? Will WN try and grab B6 by then? Will AA grab US and form the top three: United, Delta, and American? Thoughts?


"But this airplane has 4 engines, it's an entirely different kind of flying! Altogether"
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinefxramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7246 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 12614 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Sooner than you think - 777BCF.   

User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4395 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 12280 times:

Big question is: Can the economic powers of the past ( Europe and US ) keep their (barely legal) foreign ownership limitations, or will we have 3 airlines world wide in 2020: Air China, Emirates and Lufthansa.

User currently offlineSCL767 From Chile, joined Feb 2006, 8801 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 12223 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting c5load (Thread starter):
Will WN try and grab B6 by then? Will AA grab US and form the top three: United, Delta, and American? Thoughts?

WN already has AirTran! AA does not need US. IMHO, B6 will eventually join oneworld. B6 already operates into BOG and will expand into Central America via JFK, SJU and FLL. Also, B6 has expressed an interest in operating into BOG, BAQ, CUN, GEO, LIM, POS, PTY, SCL, SJO, UVF, etc. in a fashion which complements other oneworld carriers.


User currently offliner2rho From Germany, joined Feb 2007, 2596 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 11973 times:

It would be nice if in the next ten years we could see some genuine liberalization in the airline market and the removal of outdated restrictions for cross-border operations and mergers - in other words, true Open Skies and not the watered-down version that we are given today. Coca-Cola and McDonald's can set up shop anywhere they want on the planet, but LH cannot fly PEK-HKG, nor can QF fly BOG-EZE. If ownership restrictions were relaxed, cross-border mergers would start to happen on the day after.

User currently offlineYXwatcherMKE From United States of America, joined May 2007, 982 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 11852 times:

Quoting r2rho (Reply 4):
It would be nice if in the next ten years we could see some genuine liberalization in the airline market and the removal of outdated restrictions for cross-border operations and mergers - in other words, true Open Skies and not the watered-down version that we are given today. Coca-Cola and McDonald's can set up shop anywhere they want on the planet, but LH cannot fly PEK-HKG, nor can QF fly BOG-EZE. If ownership restrictions were relaxed, cross-border mergers would start to happen on the day after.

As much as many here would like to see a true "Open Skies" approach to airline operations don't count on it happening anytime soon. We have seen a major shift in the American Politic Structure in the past November 2010 Elections to a more conservative mind set, this will lead to a more of a protect what is ours view point. If a more Liberal airline market did happen the number of airlines would shrink and the ticket prices would rise way to much and we would see a big loss of passengers flying in the open skies. That's IMHO.



I miss the 60's & 70's when you felt like a guest on the plane not cattle like today
User currently offlineSCL767 From Chile, joined Feb 2006, 8801 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 11648 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 2):
Big question is: Can the economic powers of the past ( Europe and US ) keep their (barely legal) foreign ownership limitations, or will we have 3 airlines world wide in 2020: Air China, Emirates and Lufthansa.

South America has certainly made significant progress in this area. Twenty years ago, the airline industry in South America was dominated by inefficient state-owned airlines operating unprofitably with extremely low levels of accountability and transparency. Today, most of those carriers are history and the reality is that South America is now home to a couple of the world's most profitable airlines period! Lufthansa is be behind LATAM. Currently, Air China has seen its market capitalization surge to $20 billion, followed by Singapore Airlines with $14 billion and Cathay Pacific with $12 billion. China Southern has a market cap of $11 billion, as does LATAM, the Latin American airline currently being created from the merger of Chile's LAN Airlines and TAM Airlines of Brazil.


User currently offlineisitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 11492 times:

Quoting SCL767 (Reply 3):
AA does not need US.

Today..you are correct. USAIRways is going to need somebody or die.
In a business climate, its expand or die(sooner or later).
Me thinks by 2020 if I live that long, we are talking four or five...maybe six airlines in the USA.
Someone as know them today, wont be there. Its anyones guess who will fail or merge.

And never say never...NW at one time was filthy rich and EA was the number two carrier in the
world in boardings behind AeroFlot.
Pan Am to go away??.......you're joking!
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlinemacsog6 From Singapore, joined Jan 2010, 528 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11421 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting r2rho (Reply 4):
If ownership restrictions were relaxed, cross-border mergers would start to happen on the day after.

I agree. The biggest obstacle to a true streamlining of this industry, ensuring the profitability of the carrier, is the out-dated ownership laws that go back to every country haivng to have a flag carrier. This becomes a very emotional issue to some who cannot bear to see their national airline go away.

But we need it.



Sixty Plus Years of Flying! "I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things." - Saint Ex
User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11331 times:

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 2):
Big question is: Can the economic powers of the past ( Europe and US ) keep their (barely legal) foreign ownership limitations, or will we have 3 airlines world wide in 2020: Air China, Emirates and Lufthansa.

I would say the answer to your question is: Yes they can... Ever heard of the "The Civil Reserve Air Fleet" ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Reserve_Air_Fleet

Quote:

"To join Civil Reserve Air Fleet, carriers must maintain a minimum commitment of 30 percent of its Civil Reserve Air Fleet capable passenger fleet and 15 percent of its Civil Reserve Air Fleet capable cargo fleet. Aircraft committed must be U.S. registered."



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlineplanesmith From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2009, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 10824 times:

I don't think this will ever happen - too many countries are xenophobic - perhaps things are getting easier in Europe and of course the UK has surrendered away most of its company assets to foreign interests, its utility companies are now almost exclusively foreign owned, many of its railways are foreign owned, most of its "big" name companies are foreign owned, Rolls-Royce and Bentley cars are German owned, etc., etc.

Americans however are far more reluctant to see anything owned by any other country's interests yet they are happy to see companies such as Coca-Cola, Starbucks, McDonalds, Burger King etc., plant their open sores around the world whether they are welcome or not. I don't suppose LH would ever be allowed to purchase a carrier like US Air let alone AA!

The fifth-freedom battle has waged for years and we can doubt that we will ever see a BA or LH flight pick-up in NYC and drop passengers off in Hawaii let alone own a carrier that could do it. Look at the row that was caused when the Virgin franchise opened up in the USA...  


User currently offlineCharlieNoble From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 9825 times:

Quoting planesmith (Reply 10):
Americans however are far more reluctant to see anything owned by any other country's interests yet they are happy to see companies such as Coca-Cola, Starbucks, McDonalds, Burger King etc., plant their open sores around the world whether they are welcome or not.

That's a convenient but IMO unfair and simplistic viewpoint. Virtually anywhere you see a company operating overseas...

- Somebody sold/leased them the land they are operating on;
- Somebody (generally government) gave them the permit to operate, or at least didn't use their powers to intervene;
- Somebody (local) has a job there;
- Somebody is consuming their products, or there'd be no financial incentive to be there.

So to say they are "unwelcome" is a bit disingenuous. You might not like it, and Coca-Cola, Starbucks, McDonalds, Burger King may be the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse but as far as I know nobody is being forced to buy their products at gunpoint.

Regarding xenophobia - I don't think that is it at all. Some countries stand to gain from the loosening of economic/ownership policies and others stand to lose, and this differs depending on the industry/commodity. Their policies generally reflect their reality and where policies conflict they negotiate to benefit themselves. What I find amazing on here is that people expect countries to act otherwise. Welcome to Earth!


User currently offlineBD338 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 703 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9574 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 9):
Quoting Burkhard (Reply 2):
Big question is: Can the economic powers of the past ( Europe and US ) keep their (barely legal) foreign ownership limitations, or will we have 3 airlines world wide in 2020: Air China, Emirates and Lufthansa.

I would say the answer to your question is: Yes they can... Ever heard of the "The Civil Reserve Air Fleet" ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Reserve_Air_Fleet

Quote:

"To join Civil Reserve Air Fleet, carriers must maintain a minimum commitment of 30 percent of its Civil Reserve Air Fleet capable passenger fleet and 15 percent of its Civil Reserve Air Fleet capable cargo fleet. Aircraft committed must be U.S. registered."

So the requirement is for aircraft registered in the US nothing to do with ownership of the company. So, for a example a European carrier could own say, AA but would be in perfect compliance with CCRAF if the aircraft were registered in the US.

It won't happen anytime soon but these archaic ownership rules will fall sometime in the future. At the moment, in the US for example, it is OK for a defense contractor to be owned by a foreign company but an airline cannot be. Something odd there....the regulations as-is make no business sense.

When the laws are eventually relaxed there will be three main airlines:

1) Oneworld
2) Skyteam
3) Star Alliance

Then the likes of Emirates etc.


User currently offlineGoblin211 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 1209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 6734 times:

Well to put it simply,
*i think countries with terrible economic problems even worse than ours i.e. Columbia, Iraq, etc. will stay the way they are.
*The US airlines will always be flying no matter what and will only improve with the A380, 787, etc. BUT, it'll be cutting it close to the end of the decade if delays keep going the way they are.
*Overseas restrictions are absolutely necessary because frankly not a lot of countries on this planet trust one another or for whatever reason that is legit i'm sure. i do agree that some are a little out there though.

Quoting r2rho (Reply 4):

*McDonald's sells coke in their restaurants so it's kind of like a codeshare in a way and i think we need as much of those as possible



From the airport with love
User currently offlineFilipair From United States of America, joined May 2010, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 6734 times:

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 2):
Big question is: Can the economic powers of the past ( Europe and US ) keep their (barely legal) foreign ownership limitations, or will we have 3 airlines world wide in 2020: Air China, Emirates and Lufthansa.
Quoting r2rho (Reply 4):
It would be nice if in the next ten years we could see some genuine liberalization in the airline market and the removal of outdated restrictions for cross-border operations and mergers

All of this talk about "liberalization of the market" begs the question: how will the creation of a giant transnational airline oligopoly benefit the consumer?

Invariably, if the world were reduced to a few (three) main airlines, huge cuts in capacity would occur in an attempt to drive prices down. Ultimately, the airline industry would shrink to serve only the very richest who could afford exorbitant prices.

Is this what we want?

Quoting macsog6 (Reply 8):
The biggest obstacle to a true streamlining of this industry, ensuring the profitability of the carrier, is the out-dated ownership laws

Why does the profitability of the carrier need to be ensured? Why can't carriers compete for profitability like they have to now? IMHO, allowing the worlds richest airlines to dominate the airline market with "guaranteed profits" is not in our best interest.


User currently offlinecahmc85 From Portugal, joined Jul 2007, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6694 times:

What about LCC's in Europe? Will we have any mergers/acquisitions or just the normal expansion?

User currently onlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7564 posts, RR: 43
Reply 16, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6480 times:

Quoting Goblin211 (Reply 13):
Well to put it simply,
*i think countries with terrible economic problems even worse than ours i.e. Columbia, Iraq, etc. will stay the way they are.

What makes you think that Colombia (NOT Columbia) has terrible economic problems and is comparable to Iraq? Colombia is a success story in Latin America. Gone are the days of the horrible guerilla problems, drug wars, kidnappings, etc. Colombia is a fast-growth economy that is year by year moving a lot of people from poverty to middle class and that is doing things right in terms of market liberalization, fiscal discipline, etcetera. You might want to get your facts right before making an assertion like that.



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlinevirginson937 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2009, 69 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6445 times:

Chances of DL buying a stake in VS, meaning VS then join SkyTeam?? I can see that as a strong possibility.

Will


User currently offline9LFlyGuy From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 164 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6351 times:

WN + FL = Southtran    couldn't resist


My opinions do not represent the opinions of my company. They are solely the opinion of the poster.
User currently offlinePillowTester From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6232 times:

Don't forget about the NEW "new" *new* Pan Am, starting operations from Brownsville Texas this year. What's the latest word on that? Anybody?


...said Dan jubilantly.
User currently offlineSanti319 From Mexico, joined Dec 2005, 394 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6016 times:

I can see NK becomming huge like FR did in Europe...

User currently offlinelucky777 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 549 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5997 times:

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 2):
Air China, Emirates and Lufthansa

Give me a break...on one hand you berate the U.S. and its "barely legal" foreign limitations as a hindrance to worldwide airlines, and yet you mention Emirates in the very same sentence as if it isn't essentially a wholly-owned subsidiary of the UAE gov't.....talk about the pot calling the kettle black.


User currently offline413X3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1983 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5864 times:

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 16):
Gone are the days of the horrible guerilla problems, drug wars, kidnappings, etc.

What country are you talking about? You seem to be overstating progress and not being completely honest about the situation.


User currently onlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7564 posts, RR: 43
Reply 23, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5594 times:

Seriously. 2011's Colombia is much, much different from the Colombia from the 1990s. There is simply no comparison.

These are just two of many sources of information you guys may want to check: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/co.html and http://colombiareports.com/colombia-...economic-and-political-growth.html

I mean, comparing Colombia to Iraq? That is completely ridiculous. That one is definitely not being honest about the situation.

Colombia's aviation industry is just a sign of how things have changed. Their flag carrier AV just combined with TA and is joining Star Alliance soon. The carrier has renovated its fleet from oldish Mad Dogs, 757s and 767s to brand new A32xs and A330s, and will soon receive 787s. AV-TA is poised to become one of the leading airlines in the region together with LATAM. BOG is going to become a major hub in the region too... just look at the new array of flights that are being launched from/to Colombia. And competition is always a good thing for consumers, and it is just going to get red hot in Colombia with the launching of LAN Colombia. A carrier like LA would not have acquired a Colombian carrier if it had doubts about the safety of making investments there.



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineCoal From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2016 posts, RR: 9
Reply 24, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5230 times:

Quoting Goblin211 (Reply 13):
*i think countries with terrible economic problems even worse than ours i.e. Columbia, Iraq, etc. will stay the way they are.

  

Maybe you should follow the Colombian aviation thread. I think the investments in fleet and hardware by AV plus the entrance of CM and LA to the market, not to mention the entrance of the airlines to Star Alliance speaks volume of the progress that has been made in aviation. Additionally, BOG is the top cargo airport in South America and an important connecting hub.

As per the comparisons between the Colombian, American, and Iraqi economies, maybe do a little more research before posting such a meat head comment (GDP growth, public debt, current / capital accounts balances / deficits, etc).

Cheers
Coal



Nxt Flts: VA SYD-CBR-SYD | VA SYD-OOL-SYD | JQ SYD-MEL | VA MEL-CBR-SYD | DL SYD-LAX-ATL-MIA | B6 FLL-DCA-BOS | DL BOS-L
25 Superfly : Not a good anaolgy. McDonald's and Coca-Cola doesn't hurt local business as they're in locations with plenty of other restaurants and high foot traff
26 EddieDude : And Colombia is responsible for that?
27 planeguy727 : Keep in mind that organizations like McD are franchise licenses that are often owned by locals. Coca-cola allows production, bottling, and distributi
28 Superfly : ...and a very welcome addition to US airline service. Virgin America offers the best domestic service in the US.
29 travelR : I doubt this will happen since SQ owns 49% of VS. If they were to join an alliance, it would most likely be Star Alliance as I do not think SQ would
30 Superfly : Good point! That goes to show that they provide jobs in these host countries as well. This may sound silly but Starbucks always has clean bathrooms a
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Ever Shrinking Bag Of...; A The Future Is... posted Mon Apr 19 2010 19:37:44 by 2175301
The Future Of Eastern Airlines posted Mon Jun 14 2010 18:49:14 by c5load
Status Of The "Delta Airlines Shuttle" posted Sun Mar 29 2009 15:29:16 by Yankees
Of The Airlines Gone, Who Do You Miss The Most? posted Sat Apr 5 2008 05:02:38 by Mortyman
What Will Be The Future Of Passenger Seating? posted Sun Dec 16 2007 07:32:52 by PC12Fan
The Future Of Yoke/ Stick -GA posted Thu Oct 4 2007 20:13:01 by Ebs757
The Future Of IFE? posted Fri Apr 6 2007 06:21:23 by Evan767
Future Of The LCCs? posted Sun Mar 4 2007 23:20:27 by FreequentFlier
Battle Of The Airlines posted Thu May 18 2006 02:13:08 by ContinentalGuy
The Future Of Kingfisher posted Sat Apr 1 2006 18:34:04 by EdineyMarvin