Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
YVR To MEX For $99.. Cough.. Cough..  
User currently offlineauroralives From Canada, joined Nov 2007, 181 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 hours ago) and read 4641 times:

I know the topic of surcharges has been beaten to death, but I had to post this as I believe it is now taken to a new level:

Front and center on ACs website... Vancouver to Mexico City $99 !

So I picked 2 random Tuesdays in March... 15th out.. 22nd back. Both showed up with the $99 fare.. non-stop there and connecting in LAX coming back.

Get ready for it... final total: $546.80 !!

How?

Departing Flight - Tango Plus ----$98.99
Returning Flight - Tango Plus ----$98.99
Surcharges NAV ----$30.02
Fuel Surcharge ----$210.00
Canada Airport Improvement Fee ----$15.00
U.S Agriculture Fee XA ----$ 5.00
Air Travellers Security Charge ----$25.91
U.S Passenger Facility Charge ----$4.50
Mexico Intl. Arpt. Departure Tax ----$25.57
Canada Harmonized Sales Tax ----$ 1.80
Mexico Tourism Tax UK ----$21.53
September 11 Security Fee AY ----$2.50
U.S.A Immigration User Fee XY ----$6.99
Total (before options) ----$546.80


Can "free" flights be far behind???  

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinecbphoto From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1552 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 hours ago) and read 4581 times:

HAHA...that is hilarious! I hate flying out of YVR, its far cheaper to head to Seattle or something and catch a flight out of their. It will save at least a 100+ in taxes, IF you can find a cheaper fare. It is ridiculous though to think that a 199 airfare could then be followed by another 300 odd in taxes! Gotta love it!


ETOPS: Engines Turning or Passengers Swimming
User currently offlinesmoot4208 From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1305 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 hours ago) and read 4524 times:

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Get ready for it... final total: $546.80 !!

How?

Departing Flight - Tango Plus ----$98.99
Returning Flight - Tango Plus ----$98.99
Surcharges NAV ----$30.02
Fuel Surcharge ----$210.00
Canada Airport Improvement Fee ----$15.00
U.S Agriculture Fee XA ----$ 5.00
Air Travellers Security Charge ----$25.91
U.S Passenger Facility Charge ----$4.50
Mexico Intl. Arpt. Departure Tax ----$25.57
Canada Harmonized Sales Tax ----$ 1.80
Mexico Tourism Tax UK ----$21.53
September 11 Security Fee AY ----$2.50
U.S.A Immigration User Fee XY ----$6.99
Total (before options) ----$546.80


All of those except the fuel surcharge are, that does taxes; that the airline has to put in your ticket. As for the fuel surcharge, it does seem a little high, but oil is up 20% from what it was in Feb 2010. The bottom line however you look at it, the customer has to start paying the actual price


User currently offlineauroralives From Canada, joined Nov 2007, 181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months ago) and read 4277 times:

Quoting smoot4208 (Reply 2):
As for the fuel surcharge, it does seem a little high, but oil is up 20% from what it was in Feb 2010.

I've said it before... so I'll say it again here:

Fuel Capacity of A319 - 6303 usg
Range of A319 - 2760 miles
YVR - MEX - 2454 miles

For arguments sake... this trip takes a full load of gas...

6300 * $2.68 gallon for Jet-A is $16,884 for a full tank of fuel

This configuration of A319 seats 120 pax.

120 * $105 fuel surcharge = $12,500.

This is NOT a surcharge. The passengers are paying 75% of the entire cost of the fuel. This only makes sense if AC is operating under the assumption oil will forever be priced at $25/barrel.


User currently offlineklm77 From Canada, joined Sep 2009, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4261 times:

This reminds me of when AC also had on their front page YYZ-LHR one way for $199. So I did the same thing as you, one way 199 and the other 199. That's 398 total right? Seems like a steal....plus 436 taxes... the taxes are more then the ticket!

User currently offlineYYZRWY23 From Canada, joined Aug 2009, 561 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4259 times:

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Surcharges NAV ----$30.02

Used to be a crown corp, now private. Probably cheapre than what was paid to government employees.

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Canada Airport Improvement Fee

Charged by Transport Canada I think, but I could very well be wrong.

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
U.S Agriculture Fee XA ----$ 5.00

US Government.

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Air Travellers Security Charge

Canadian Government

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
U.S Passenger Facility Charge ----$4.50

US Government.

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Mexico Intl. Arpt. Departure Tax ----$25.57

Mexican Government

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Mexico Tourism Tax UK

Mexican Government

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
September 11 Security Fee AY

US Government (?)

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
U.S.A Immigration User Fee XY

US Government

My recommendation: pull out the pen and paper and start writing letters to these three governments.

Don't put this on AC, as you can see that they are willing and able to charge a low fare to the consumer for this service. It is proven in the $1.80 (or should it be $18.00....either way) HST. You could knock about $20.00 of your fare by not connecting in the US on the way back. Point is, airports are expensive to run, and the money has to come from somewhere. I think it is more fair to charge those using those facilities than those who don't. And, seeing as I am on this website, I am clearly not a non-traveler. I pay enough of these fees yearly, but being near YYZ, BUF is used when available and feasible.

YYZRWY23



If you don't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4249 times:

Quoting cbphoto (Reply 1):
It is ridiculous though to think that a 199 airfare could then be followed by another 300 odd in taxes!

Note that $210 is a fuel surcharge. That's not a tax. It goes to the airline and is really part of the fare.

I don't know why Canada still permits airlines to advertise fares like that. In Europe it's a legal requirement that all advertised fares include all taxes/fees/surcharges. The only exceptions are optional charges (e.g. for carriers that charge for checked baggage etc) and for usually small fees for payment by credit card. Passengers only care about the grand total.


User currently offlinekeagkid101 From Portugal, joined Mar 2010, 306 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4237 times:

Ridiculous! All those taxes and fees! I'd rather drive than than pay that lol

User currently offlineauroralives From Canada, joined Nov 2007, 181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4228 times:

Quoting YYZRWY23 (Reply 5):
Point is, airports are expensive to run, and the money has to come from somewhere. I think it is more fair to charge those using those facilities than those who don't.

No dispute whatsoever. The people who use should pay for the services / facilities.

The problem here is an "advertised" price, and the price one eventually pays. The cost of doing business should be rolled into the final advertised price.

Imagine you went to Walmart and picked up a pair of pants with the sticker price of $1.25. You then went to the casher who said:

Cashier fee ---$0.25
Warehouse storage fee ----$0.50
Store Management fee ----$2.00
Transport from harbour to store -----$2.50
Fuel surcharge on local transport ----$1.25
Overseas shipping fee ----$1.68
Transport ship crew feeding fee ----$0.89
Upper management performance bonus fee ----$4.55
Local and regional taxes ---$1.10
Accountant to figure out taxes fee ---$1.30
etc, etc etc...

You get my drift...

Soon it will be $0.01 airfares, with all the rest in fees  


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4930 posts, RR: 43
Reply 9, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4213 times:

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Get ready for it... final total: $546.80 !!


Not a bad deal really, for about 5000 miles of travel.
Comparable fares, all taxes/fees in for SEA-MEX-SEA is about $410.00.

However, I agree fully with the above sentiment. And, if I am not mistaken, there are new consumer rules and protocols being enacted in Canada that will no longer allow such pricing. It's about time.

Quoting auroralives (Reply 3):
This is NOT a surcharge. The passengers are paying 75% of the entire cost of the fuel. This only makes sense if AC is operating under the assumption oil will forever be priced at $25/barrel.

Indeed it is not, however, I am going to have to imagine that it would not be Politically Correct to call it what it really is ... an "It's about time you actually paid for what it costs to fly you from A to B" charge.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineYYZRWY23 From Canada, joined Aug 2009, 561 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4188 times:

Quoting auroralives (Reply 8):
You get my drift...

I very well understand your view on this, and the point you are trying to make. But, in my opinion, this is fair marketing technique. It gets people onto the airline's site, and gets them looking at flights. Who knows, maybe someone sees that fare, and then sees it is really high, but then they go to the "Vacations" link on the airline site, and book a full vacation (usually cheaper then a la carte). Consumers aren't being mis-leaded, as it does says "plus taxes, surcharges, fees...etc).

The reason Wal Mart doesn't do that is because of the type of establishment it is. Wal Mart, known for its low prices, attracts foot traffic into the store just on brand image alone. Even though they do advertise, people wanting the cheapest option will still try Wal Mart first. So they do not need to advertise the actual cost, then tack on fees. Airlines don't have a "store front", so they need to get people onto their sites in the first place.

But I think this is a "agree to disagree" situation.

Quoting longhauler (Reply 9):
And, if I am not mistaken, there are new consumer rules and protocols being enacted in Canada that will no longer allow such pricing.

I believe this is correct. While I can't find a source, I have heard of this for a while.

YYZRWY23



If you don't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them.
User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 35
Reply 11, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4185 times:

Quoting auroralives (Thread starter):
Departing Flight - Tango Plus ----$98.99
Returning Flight - Tango Plus ----$98.99
Surcharges NAV ----$30.02
Fuel Surcharge ----$210.00
Canada Airport Improvement Fee ----$15.00
U.S Agriculture Fee XA ----$ 5.00
Air Travellers Security Charge ----$25.91
U.S Passenger Facility Charge ----$4.50
Mexico Intl. Arpt. Departure Tax ----$25.57
Canada Harmonized Sales Tax ----$ 1.80
Mexico Tourism Tax UK ----$21.53
September 11 Security Fee AY ----$2.50
U.S.A Immigration User Fee XY ----$6.99
Total (before options) ----$546.80

God, I love the advertising practices in this country  



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineVonRichtofen From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 4627 posts, RR: 36
Reply 12, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4168 times:

What pisses me off more than deceptive advertising is how bogus most of those taxes are. US Agriculture fee? What does somebody flying to or via the US have to do with their agriculture industry??

And don't get me started on the BS "security" taxes. Totally taking advantage of fear to milk the population even more. Call it "sept 11 tak" and nobody will question it!


What nonsense.



Word
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4094 times:

Quoting VonRichtofen (Reply 12):
US Agriculture fee? What does somebody flying to or via the US have to do with their agriculture industry??

Certain food products can't be brought into the US. The fee covers the cost of such things as dogs trained to find such products hidden in luggage.


User currently offlineblueflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 3971 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 4047 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting auroralives (Reply 3):
This is NOT a surcharge. The passengers are paying 75% of the entire cost of the fuel.

AC calls it a surcharge, so why wouldn't we? The passengers are paying 100% of the cost of fuel, what is more accurate is that 25% of the cost of fuel is included in the initial fare, and the rest in a fuel surcharge, for the purpose of artificially lowering the initial ticket price.

Based on your excellent numbers, the fuel surcharge pays $12,500 out of an estimated total of $16,884 in fuel (probably less with rebates, etc), which leaves $4,384 as the estimated value of a full tank before surcharge. That means AC figured a cost of $0.70/gallon when pricing that particular trip! Look back two years and you'll see that at no time was the spot price less than twice that cost!

I don't think anyone can make the case honestly that AC (1) hasn't looked at its operating costs in two years .They know that they should plan on spending at least $8,600 in fuel for this trip, but that would mean adding $36 to the initial ticket cost per passenger (assuming a full plane) and that attractive $99 fare becomes a somewhat less appealing $135.

Better to continue advertising a $99 price, to vastly and purposely underestimate the cost of fuel necessary for the trip and to make up the difference through a fuel surcharge.

In my book, that is false, dishonest advertising, but I don't see it go away until merchants are either forbidden from advertising prices that are below cost, or are prevented from adding on unavoidable charges and fees that are not government-mandated to the price of a ticket.

(1) and pretty much any other carrier applying fuel surcharges.



I've got $h*t to do
User currently offlineWildcatYXU From Canada, joined May 2006, 2603 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 4021 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 6):
I don't know why Canada still permits airlines to advertise fares like that.



I have a feeling Viscount724 that you've been away from Canada for too long time   . Otherwise you would know that this is a common practice around here. Buying a car? You have the list price, but then you have to add:

- Fuel excise tax (as we don't pay enough tax in the fuel price)
- Air conditioning excise tax
- Delivery
- Tax

Or how about my natural gas bill:

- Gas price
- Gas price adjustment
- Storage
- Transportation to Union gas
- Delivery
- Delivery price adjustment

All of this is charged per cubic metre. Add to this the monthly charge and HST (both separate items on the bill).
So, AC is only doing what everybody else is doing. Not like I agree with it, I just take it as a fact of life. As far as AC's pricing is concerned, one has to be aware of this only when booking a ticket to EU on airline web sites. AC's prices are broken down like this, while the Europeans have final prices on their sites.


User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 35
Reply 16, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4013 times:

Quoting WildcatYXU (Reply 15):
I have a feeling Viscount724 that you've been away from Canada for too long time . Otherwise you would know that this is a common practice around here.

Don't forget cell phones plans ... $XX a month plus $XX tax plus $XX system access fee plus $XX 911 access fee, etc.

But airlines charging almost 6 times their advertised price is beyond decitful. Thats one of the things I really miss about living in Germany, you see a price advertised you pay that price, not like here we you have to pull out a bloody calculator and start adding everything to figure out exactly what you really have to pay.



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineWildcatYXU From Canada, joined May 2006, 2603 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (3 years 6 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4009 times:

Quoting ACDC8 (Reply 16):
But airlines charging almost 6 times their advertised price is beyond decitful.



Sure, at least the fuel and Nav charges should be a part of the base fare. These are, after all, elementary parts of the airline business costs...
Otherwise we may see a base fare of $ 5 and with everything else added. Imagine:
Captain's fee
FO fee
CSD fee
FA fee (that may multiply, in dependence on the aircraft)
Aircraft usage fee
And the list would go further and further, until the full fare is built 
Quoting ACDC8 (Reply 16):
Thats one of the things I really miss about living in Germany, you see a price advertised you pay that price, not like here we you have to pull out a bloody calculator and start adding everything to figure out exactly what you really have to pay.



This is one of the few things I'm missing about living in the old country too. OTOH it's good to be reminded about all the parasites sucking on the businesses and consumers.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 18, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3981 times:

Quoting WildcatYXU (Reply 15):
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 6):
I don't know why Canada still permits airlines to advertise fares like that.



I have a feeling Viscount724 that you've been away from Canada for too long time. Otherwise you would know that this is a common practice around here. Buying a car? You have the list price, but then you have to add:

That's my point. It should be broken out on the receipt but advertising should only show the grand total.

It's the same for hotels. Book a hotel room in Europe and the quoted amount is all you pay. In Canada and the US, the total is often 15% or 20% more with GST, provincial/state and often local taxes added. In Europe you only see those amounts broken out on your final bill.


User currently offlineAirCanada787 From Canada, joined Nov 2010, 282 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3954 times:

Quoting YYZRWY23 (Reply 10):
Quoting longhauler (Reply 9):
And, if I am not mistaken, there are new consumer rules and protocols being enacted in Canada that will no longer allow such pricing.

I believe this is correct. While I can't find a source, I have heard of this for a while.

There was a bill (Bill C-11) which the House of Commons voted unanimously on in February of 2007. In June of 2007 the Bill was passed and it amended the Canada Transportation Act so airlines will be forced to advertise the full cost of a ticket, including any fees, surcharges and taxes. When the bill was passed I believe that it was announced that the federal cabinet would set a date for its implementation after consultations with the industry and the provinces. This past June there was an article in the National Post about how the Transport Minister had still not held or set a date for the consultations. There was also a private members bill introduced to the house in 2009 that had all in pricing in it as well as a passengers bill of rights.


Also in Ontario and Quebec any advertising done by a travel agency must list a price that includes all fees and surcharges due to legislation in those provinces.



The mind, like a parachute, functions only when open.
User currently offlinekeagkid101 From Portugal, joined Mar 2010, 306 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3947 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 9):
Not a bad deal really, for about 5000 miles of travel.

It's how the flight is advertised. It shouldn't be advertised as $99.


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4930 posts, RR: 43
Reply 21, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3936 times:

Quoting keagkid101 (Reply 20):
It's how the flight is advertised. It shouldn't be advertised as $99.

Which is the whole point of this entire thread, and I am pretty sure no one here will argue with you.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air China; Economy YVR To PEK posted Wed Dec 8 2010 10:21:35 by JoeCanuck
If You Had To Vote For Best 1stClass Meal Service? posted Sat Nov 6 2010 11:14:42 by readytotaxi
What To Do For 7 Hours @ DXB? posted Wed Nov 3 2010 14:31:57 by PeterJ
Just Flew On Iberia 6407 MAD To MEX Equipment posted Sun Aug 22 2010 18:22:23 by balkantodelta
BA Won't Allow Me To Pay For An Upgrade posted Mon May 10 2010 04:40:50 by mckvakk
LAS-LAX To Short For Inflight Service? posted Wed Mar 17 2010 10:50:41 by Delta777Jet
WN Refuses To Pay For Lost Gate-checked Crew Bag posted Tue Dec 22 2009 14:10:04 by Jmc1975
Where To Sit For The DCA River Visual posted Thu Aug 20 2009 05:36:08 by YYZRWY23
Help Me Book YUL (area) To BRE For Xmas posted Sun Aug 2 2009 05:41:13 by KLM672
IAD: Time To Allow For Shuttle From Remote Lot? posted Mon Jun 1 2009 11:59:11 by DCA-ROCguy