Tigerguy From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1061 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5121 times:
My vote goes for the DC-10. The TriStar just looks too stubby and bulky to me (even though they were actually lighter). Granted, the DC-10 also suffers from this, but much less so. I think the straight-through engine looks better in this case. If the TriStar had the sleek lines of a 727, then we'd be getting somewhere...
Flying friendly for a while, but is that a widget I see in the rear-view mirror?
BAViscount From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2338 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (3 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4839 times:
It really is a close call. I always liked both aircraft, although I only ever got to fly on a DC10 (unlike both of my parents who both made Tristar flights, my Mum on Delta and my Dad on British Airtours!), but I think the DC10 probably wins for me. I think for me the DC10 looks like a proper metal bird, unlike most planes these days that look plastic! The Tristar was a bit "plasticy" too!
Ladies & gentlemen this is Captain Tobias Wilcock welcoming you aboard Coconut Airways flight 372 to Bridgetown Barb
carbon787 From United States of America, joined May 2010, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (3 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4724 times:
It has to be the L1011 for me. I flew in it as a teenager back in 1973. I've also flown in the DC10 and MD11 in the 80's and 90's, never was a big fan of the DC10, always thought the rear engine looked like an after thought placement.
tsugambler From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 302 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (3 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4698 times:
I say the DC-10. I know many people like the s-duct in the tail, and I know it's actually a lighter structure than the straight-through duct, but it just LOOKS bulkier to me (it makes me think the L-1011 has a big a$$). Plus, the nose/radome of the L-1011 is definitely less attractive than the DC-10's smooth, sleek bullet-shape. The cockpit windows on the L-1011, although curved, are also less distinctive than the DC-10's.
runner13 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (3 years 8 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4672 times:
I say the L-1011. I flew on a CO DC-10 from EWR-FCO in 1998, and thought it was great but I was sitting in the middle of the middle, and the flight was horrible. I just remember the DL L1011's departing DFW one after another back in the mid to late 90's while waiting for Rangers players to get to the game to get autographs. I just loved them.