Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question On UAL900  
User currently offlinetoering From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 176 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3234 times:

Whats going on here?
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL900

Can't imagine it's a medical divert.

What would warrent this type of divert to a 744 base, and not get it down sooner? Or continue to FRA which is another 744 base for an alliance partner?

[Edited 2011-11-06 18:55:06]

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2808 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3127 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Maybe they had an engine go down and just figured it'd be cheaper just to fly to ORD where they can fix it and not have to deal with the mess of shipping an engine or leasing one. Not to mention it'll be easier to get pax seats vs out of say Winnipeg.
Blue



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15781 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3117 times:

Quoting toering (Thread starter):
What would warrent this type of divert to a 744 base, and not get it down sooner?

A non-urgent technical issue. Nothing dangerous enough to warrant getting down immediately, but serious enough that crossing the Atlantic is questionable. Taking the plane to a base minimizes downtime, saves money, and allows passengers to be re-accommodated with minimal delay and disruption.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9077 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2788 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting toering (Thread starter):
What would warrent this type of divert to a 744 base, and not get it down sooner? Or continue to FRA which is another 744 base for an alliance partner?

On a flight from SFO to FRA you have quite a big of fuel on board and you are well above maximum landing weight. So landing right after take off will end in an overweight landing. You do that if you have to due to a severe emergency. But if it is a minor thing which doesn't allow you to continue to your destination you talk to the company where the mechanics can halp you best. And you have time to burn off fuel and land below maximum landing weight. Another point is: what to do with the passengers. UA has a big Star Alliance base in ORD, so they can rebook the passengers on other UA or LH flights to FRA or connect them via some other airport with their own airplanes.

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A Question On Hand Luggage posted Sat Oct 29 2011 08:58:26 by grimey
Upgrade Question On QF For AA Platinum posted Fri Apr 15 2011 10:29:10 by SWALoveField
Question On Aircraft On Continental Flight On Sat. posted Fri Dec 3 2010 06:48:31 by TranStar
Question On JetBlue BOS-DEN posted Mon Sep 20 2010 18:23:11 by Soxfan
Question On Delta Complimentary Upgrades posted Sun Jul 18 2010 15:34:23 by rsrik
Question On Delayed Flights And Crew Rest posted Tue May 11 2010 21:15:07 by Soxfan
Question On DY Seating Policy posted Sat Apr 24 2010 14:43:42 by Tobias2702
Question On Misconnecting And Miles posted Tue Feb 16 2010 09:22:13 by Yflyer
Seat Row Question On CO 777 posted Sun Dec 20 2009 10:21:11 by PI4EVER
Question On Transit In MEX posted Mon Dec 7 2009 16:48:58 by LTU932