Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No Row 13 On United  
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7101 times:

Hello all. I am trying to book a flight from MYR-EWR-MYR on UA on a Q400 and I noticed on seatguru that there is no row 13. It just goes from row 12 to row 14. I understand why they do this and I woudl be hard-pressed to sit in tat row, but my question is,

1. Do they do this on all of their planes?
2. Do other airlines do this?

Thanks

[Edited 2012-07-13 09:00:03]

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3058 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7094 times:

Good list of all seatmaps here: http://www.seatguru.com/ that will answer yoru questions.

User currently offlineshamrock321 From Ireland, joined May 2008, 1607 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7081 times:

Lots of airlines do it, and lots dont!

A look at seatguru indicates that some planes do have it, perhaps they are ex CO or it just depends on configuration.


User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7053 times:

Are you purposely posting this today because it's Friday the 13th?

User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7037 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 3):
Are you purposely posting this today because it's Friday the 13th?

Actually, I forgot about it until I saw the date on my calendar about five minutes after I posted this!  Wow!


User currently offlineMainliner From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 418 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6975 times:

Interesting. SeatGuru doesn't list a reason for skipping row 13 on the Q400, but I'm sure it's to alleviate superstitious fears. Many hotels don't have a 13th floor for this reason. I know my airline's Dash 8-300's do have a row 13, and I've never heard any gripes on THAT particular subject. We get plenty of other aircraft-related quips though  


Every flight counts.
User currently offlinefalkerker From Seychelles, joined Apr 2012, 163 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6959 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 4):
Actually, I forgot about it until I saw the date on my calendar about five minutes after I posted this

Purposely or not, I do find it interesting that airlines eliminate row 13. However it's not only airlines, most buildings go from floor 12 to 14, most sports players avoid number 13 and so on... It's quite interesting from a sociological standpoint.


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6959 times:

Quoting falkerker (Reply 6):
Purposely or not, I do find it interesting that airlines eliminate row 13. However it's not only airlines, most buildings go from floor 12 to 14, most sports players avoid number 13 and so on... It's quite interesting from a sociological standpoint.

I avoid it as much as possible. I am the most superstitious person ever and if I ever had to fly on a plane with a MSN or Registration # ending in -13 I honestly would probably be pretty uneasy.


User currently offlineCOEWR787 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 338 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6738 times:

Dan Brown's book suggests that this has something to do with the Knights Templar's Paris establishment being unceremoniously dismantled by the King of France on Friday the 13th. Experts however believe that these are recently popularized correlations and there is no strong evidence that the 13 superstition has anything really to do with the Knights Templar.

User currently offlinesimairlinenet From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 922 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6713 times:

This also occurs with undesirable flight numbers. At Delta, the following flight numbers were not to be used:
13
191 (Delta crash)
666
911
1313
5191 (Comair crash)

In the past, any use of 13 (1300-1399) was not used, and perhaps xx13 as well (not sure about this part).


User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 463 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6685 times:

sUA (ie Prior Merger United) aircraft adopted the sCO seating charts for all domestic planes (ie airbus and 757's). That meant common numbering for exit rows and the removal of some row numbers. This was done about a year ago in the effort to help have uniformity across the fleet. It (in theory) was to help ensure that if a plane swap happened it would be easier to protect those customers in those consistent seats exit row to exit row, etc

Most airlines follow the retirement of numbers after significant events. I think it was late last year that UA loaded flights with a number from a significant event (I think it was a 9/11 flight number) and that was meet with outrage here and other forums.
UA called it a mistake and renumbered the flights. UA has a shortage of flight numbers given all the flights they run but even still they hold to this strategy.


User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3058 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6602 times:

Quoting simairlinenet (Reply 9):
666

The irony in that is that they have a ship # 666:

25034 354 757-232 22/03/1991 N666DN


User currently offlineYflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 1080 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6572 times:

Quoting shamrock321 (Reply 2):
A look at seatguru indicates that some planes do have it, perhaps they are ex CO or it just depends on configuration.

I remember looking at Seatguru years ago, before the merger, and noticing two different CRJ configurations listed under United. As far as I could tell the only difference was that one had a row 13 and the other didn't. I suspect it depends on the regional airline that's actually operating the flight.


User currently offlineytib From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 576 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 6500 times:

Quoting catiii (Reply 11):
The irony in that is that they have a ship # 666:

25034 354 757-232 22/03/1991 N666DN

United also has a ship N666UA, which in 2001 loss power on a flight OGG-LAX they were able to restart and land to KOA. I believe this was on climb out.

In the past UA never used 13xx flight numbers, but you could check the flight status of those in the system as they were used for training. Not sure what is done since 3/3 and the transition to SHARES.


User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2102 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 6454 times:

Many UA aircraft skip over several rows since the exit row is always row 20. Some people are afraid of row 13 and few care that it is missing so they eliminate it so they do not have to worry about having trouble selling it. Many Asians have a superstition against the number 4 so we might start to see that row disappear in the future.

User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7679 posts, RR: 17
Reply 15, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 6419 times:

BD do not have a row 13. However the interiors of their aircraft are being gradually switched to the BA style. BA do have a row 13. So I assume all former BD aircraft soon will also soon have a row 13.

User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 3827 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6383 times:

This is SO funny because no matter how hard you try, you just CAN'T eliminate row 13, because row 14 will be the actual row 13 if you skip the numbering. So what is the whole point.
But on a related note, have you noticed how sometimes dozens of numbers are skipped and your row numbers are all over the place? I flew on China Eastern recently and my boarding pass read 61L so I expected an A380 at least, but it was just an A330 with tons of row numbers skipped. But on seatguru they don't show it like this. What gives?

Soren   



All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
User currently offlinedc9northwest From Switzerland, joined Feb 2007, 2299 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 6364 times:

Sign me up for Black Cat Airlines Flight #1313 on a 313, seat 13A today, Friday the 13th.

It's just stupid... BTW, Lufthansa and Alitalia also skip row 17!


User currently offlineAlnessW From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 6350 times:

Quoting ORDBOSEWR (Reply 10):
sUA (ie Prior Merger United) aircraft adopted the sCO seating charts for all domestic planes (ie airbus and 757's). That meant common numbering for exit rows and the removal of some row numbers. This was done about a year ago in the effort to help have uniformity across the fleet. It (in theory) was to help ensure that if a plane swap happened it would be easier to protect those customers in those consistent seats exit row to exit row, etc

  

It all has to do with former-CO's dumb-bum seat numbering. They apparently wanted ALL of their aircraft to have the same exit row numbers, 20 and 21 (no clue why) and UA picked up the system. They renumbered the seats on all of their A320 and 757 (and other?) aircraft. They also eliminated row 13 for reasons explained in earlier posts.


User currently offlineplaneguy727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1251 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 6285 times:

Some UAexpress CRJ-700s have a row 13. I booked my step mom into 13A on SLC-ORD the other day.


I want to live in an old and converted 727...
User currently offlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 5903 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6256 times:

Quoting AlnessW (Reply 18):
(no clue why)

Actually it's quite simple and fairly ingenious. It allows last minute aircraft swaps with minimal need for issuing new seat assignments. It doesn't matter whether it is a 735 or 752 - they have the same overawing exits meaning that 20-35 are pretty much guaranteed a seat regardless of what turns up. That means that only those in the last few rows in front of the wing and the very back of the plane need to be reseated in the case of a down gauge



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently offlineAlnessW From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 6216 times:

Quoting planeguy727 (Reply 19):
Some UAexpress CRJ-700s have a row 13. I booked my step mom into 13A on SLC-ORD the other day.

Interesting to know, thanks.

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 20):
Actually it's quite simple and fairly ingenious.

Perhaps it may be simple but I'd say it's hardly "ingenious."

IMO, there is just something weird about seatnumbering looking like this:

9
10
11
12
14
20
21
22

etc...


User currently offlineSeptember11 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3623 posts, RR: 21
Reply 22, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 6137 times:

speaking of skipping row #s

Good example: AA's M80 row # sequencing in first starts at 3
(no row 1 & 2)

[Edited 2012-07-15 16:24:11]


Airliners.net of the Future
User currently offlineAlnessW From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6067 times:

Quoting September11 (Reply 22):
Good example: AA's M80 row # sequencing in first starts at 3
(no row 1 & 2)

That's odd, too.


User currently offlineaerdingus From Ireland, joined Dec 2006, 2848 posts, RR: 16
Reply 24, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 6021 times:

FR has no row 13, even with Satan at the helm....


Cabin crew blog http://dolefuldolegirl.blogspot.ie/
25 Viscount724 : Interestingly, CO was one of the only major U.S. carriers that skipped row 13 while UA aircraft had a row numbered 13. I was curious how this was goin
26 Post contains images AlnessW : Interesting indeed. I don't think I was aware of this. Haha, I found out when looking up UA seatmaps in mid-2011 that the seat numbers appeared to be
27 HAWK21M : Isn't row 14 actually row 13.....then why bother skipping the latter......
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Updated: No Warm Nuts On AA In F On Some Routes posted Fri May 11 2012 14:52:40 by N62NA
Cannot Access Reservation On United.com posted Fri May 4 2012 05:18:44 by AA757MIA
Channel 9 On United posted Thu Apr 26 2012 11:25:51 by DAL763ER
Question About Surprise Upgrade Tomorrow On United posted Thu Apr 12 2012 21:17:35 by flySFO
F Meal Service On United posted Thu Dec 23 2010 14:17:38 by washingtonian
Question About P.S. Service On United posted Fri Nov 5 2010 05:59:28 by SeeTheWorld
Why No Free Upgrades On American? posted Tue Oct 19 2010 14:32:32 by RoseFlyer
Upgrading On United--Novice Questions posted Sat Oct 16 2010 15:45:32 by washingtonian
I Pulled A Fast One On United CRJ! posted Mon Sep 13 2010 04:34:32 by CharlieNoble
Coveted Exit Row Seats On Emirates? posted Mon Apr 12 2010 23:09:40 by Fly2YYZ