mal787 From Australia, joined Jul 2007, 713 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5912 times:
My ideal airline
All boeing fleet
36" in Y
lie flat on J
best in flight ent' system out there
upper deck lounge bar on 748's
main cabin on 777w
network mix of SQ & QFmainly for QF dom feed
No children, no bogan class fares
theme flights , halloween etc. mardi gras flights to cities that have them with cute little camp cabin crew to boost party along
BN2 Metro, 402,404, Conquest, king air, 707,727.200, 732,733,734,735,736,738,757,762,763,742,743,744, MD11, DC9,Westwind
Ps76 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 5835 times:
I always like the Landmark Airlines from Microsoft Flightsim 2004. It is a global airline and keeps the livery the same but changes the image on the tail to things like Mt.Rushmore or the Coliseum etc. It could theoretically fly anywhere with different tail schemes representing the different regions it flew to. It is of course fictional because you couldn't have one airline flying througout the whole World.
PHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 8153 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 5699 times:
Here we go:
All of today's excessive airport fees, fuel prices, etc etc etc aside- i.e., in a perfect world
CVG as main base (surprised?)
Coast-to-coast flights from CVG with secondary hubs in BOS, SEA, SAN, RDU, and CHS
Flights from CVG, SEA, SAN to PHX, LAX, SLC, PDX, SFO, LGB, HNL, ABQ, YVR, DEN, SAT, IAH, DFW, SNA, SBA
Flights from CVG, BOS, RDU, and CHS to MIA, FLL, CLT, ATL, SAV, PGD, IAH, DFW, EWR, JFK, BGR, PIT, PHL, LEX, AVL, YYZ
63bobster From Netherlands, joined Jan 2012, 44 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 8 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5625 times:
First: I would build an airline that has proper Y and C cabins on intra-European flights, just like in the rest of the world: regular economy-seats in Y and proper big reclining seats in C, even if that means a fixed number of seats in both classes.
Second: Like in Thailand, Malaysia and other parts of S.E Asia, I would use Wide-body equipment on high density routes. There's a whole lot of flying going on in Europe and if one can fill a number of A330's in S.E. Asia, so can one in Europe. If that means less daily flights it even serves the environment.
Third, there must be a fare-structure that can support this, but if low-cost airlines can survive on the fares they are using now I'm sure a similar system can also be applied on an airline operating -say- B77-200's in a 2-class configuration.
Of course it's all just a thought but it would be nice to travel in a Europe with an airline like this.