Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Should LHR Get 3rd Runway - 7 Day Poll  
User currently offlineairbusa340 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 54 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5638 times:

Maybe we can do a simple poll as to whether LHR should get a third runway!!
Very simple, just answer YES or NO together with the area in the UK or Worldwide that you live.
Let's see how many replies we get in 7 days..
Paul.

Oh buy the way YES!! Hertfordshire UK


Airbusa340
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinegingersnap From United Kingdom, joined exactly 4 years ago today! , 893 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5604 times:

YES Holbeach, Lincolnshire UK


Flown on: A306 A319/20/21 A332 B732/3/4/5/7/8 B742/4 B752 B762/3 B772/W C152 E195 F70/100 MD-82 Q400
User currently offlineblackwidow From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 5549 times:

YES - Surrey, United Kingdom

User currently onlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12434 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5501 times:

YES; definitely! It's vital for the economy and they've wasted two years already. No more messing about.

User currently offlineeuflyer From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5494 times:

YES - cheaper to build a new runway than to build a LHR sized replacment airport, and as big build projects in the UK have a tendency to go "a little bit" over budget: wembley stadium, olympic park, scot parliament, west coast re-build.

Hertfordshire, UK

[Edited 2012-09-05 11:01:26]

User currently offlinejumpjets From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 807 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 5436 times:

YES - London SW15 [just off the LHR flight paths]. We aren't all NIMBYs!

User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 26946 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5431 times:

Yes for sure its well overdue . - Ireland ( Formerly West London ) .

User currently offlinesantos From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2007, 740 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5429 times:

Yes- SW7-London, UK
I'm also on the LHR flight path


User currently offlineeicvd From Ireland, joined Mar 2008, 2155 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5352 times:

Yes! Dublin, Ireland.

User currently offlinesbworcs From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 842 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5350 times:

Yes. Worcester UK. Needed badlly as airlines, despite what the NIMBYS say do not want to use regional airports


The best way forwards is upwards!
User currently onlineVasu From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 3891 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5350 times:

YES. Kent, UK. They should cut all the cr*p and just get on with it!

User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17065 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5331 times:

Yes, of course. Stockholm, Sweden.

Interesting to note that only the Brits and Irish have answered!



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineba319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8534 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5323 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

YES - Harefield, 16 miles north of Heathrow.


111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlineHywel From Uganda, joined Apr 2008, 802 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5308 times:

I'll be the first to say no. LHR is in a bad location because due to the prevailing winds, runway 27 is in most common use and hence aircraft have to fly over central London. Plus the land around it is already quite busy, with villages, the M4 motorway etc.

I'd prefer to build a brand new airport in the Thames estuary and connect a high-speed train link to central London (the journey could be easily done in 15 mins - same as the current Heathrow Express). Just look at HKG for an example that's worked out well.

Otherwise, the southern side of LGW just consists of fields. Build a new runway and terminal there, and then you wouldn't have to evict villagers like at LHR.

(London born, currently in Southampton).


User currently offlinen729pa From UK - England, joined Jan 2011, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5029 times:

YES....absolutely. No one will build a new airport anywhere in the UK, because of the objections to it (NIMBY).....therefore you have to develop what we already have. Period...IMHO

User currently offlineLHRBFSTrident From UK - Northern Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 655 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5013 times:

Yes - Los Angeles (originally Co. Down & South Warwickshire)

(hmmmm - apparently the 7 days is over, but oddly this is the first time I saw this thread, and I check daily...)

[Edited 2012-09-19 15:40:08]


Next up: LAX-LHR NZ002 Y SkyCouch! LHR-LAX NZ001 Y
User currently offlineairtrainer From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 1557 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4981 times:

I'll join the crowd : YES   - Waremme, Belgium.


Life is short : eat dessert first !
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1820 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4976 times:

I dont care, I never go there anymore, its too crowded and a mess. I am anti HUB  

User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11645 posts, RR: 60
Reply 18, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4958 times:

No, as a preferred first option I do not believe a third runway should be built.

In a matter of years from opening we will go from two overcrowded runways to three overcrowded runways and be back where we started, with LHR operating at 99% capacity, albeit with a few more frequencies and destinations than before. The UK needs to take a step back and think coherently and holistically about its long term future air travel and connectivity needs. I believe the only way of achieving this is with a clean sheet hub airport, most likely to the East of London in the Thames. This does not mean that other London airports should close or that LHR should close fully (premium, cargo, key business destinations could still be supported and compliment redevelopment); even at low levels of passenger growth a massive new hub could not replace LGW and STN too.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 2967 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4956 times:

YES, but I'm all for a brand new facility North West of London.

Sydney/Canberra, Australia, but from London TW11  


User currently offlinestarrymarkb From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2011, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 4911 times:

YES - Devon, UK

A big problem with a Thames Esturary airport (or indeed an airport east of London) is that it will make access difficult from a large part of Southern England, The Midlands and anywhere north of London - Heathrow doesn't just serve London!


User currently offlinebabybus From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4891 times:

Absolutely not! South London under the flight path.

User currently offlinelewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3629 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4675 times:

Yes - Los Angeles (have lived in London before)

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 18):

These are fair points, but what about all the investments on LHR right now, a brand new terminal 5 with all other terminals being renovated? Should these just be used for a decade or so until a new airport is built, leaving them under-utilized when LHR becomes a business/cargo airport?

As the estuary airport is considered kind of a dream right now (environmental and other considerations), where do you think the new airport should be moved? Won't you just end up pissing off people again, just in a different location, who never even imagined having an airport next to them when they built/purchased their homes?

I just don't get the nuisance part with LHR. Yes, aircraft are noisy but I also live in a city where planes approach from all over the place and fly over a big part of the city. In such big cities, the noise from the aircraft is the least of our problems. I have lived in west London, to tell you the truth, my building shaking every time the tube passed below us (which would start early in the morning and go on all day in 3' intervals) was more annoying than aircraft approaching LHR. London is NOT the only city with a busy approach path over it.


User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7701 posts, RR: 21
Reply 23, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4605 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

NO - Hertfordshire, UK. I hope STN expands, unlike most of the nimby losers around me.


✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlineshamrock350 From Ireland, joined Mar 2005, 6334 posts, RR: 14
Reply 24, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4592 times:

YES - Harrow, NW London.

In reality a 4th runway would be needed as well, can't see it happening but I'd be all for it.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Duty-Free Carts-Should They Get Rid Of Them? posted Sat Oct 27 2007 23:30:03 by Wolborsk
Best Time Of Day To Schedule Intl Arrival To LHR? posted Tue Aug 7 2012 20:47:57 by irishtexan
Christmas Day @ LHR posted Mon Dec 5 2011 02:54:14 by GBan
1K With UA: Should I Try To Get GS Or Move To AA? posted Sun Nov 6 2011 10:31:31 by finwhiz
Which Airline Credit Card Should I Get posted Wed Dec 23 2009 23:13:56 by DocLightning
AA156 Day Flight BOS-LHR Questions posted Sat Dec 5 2009 10:12:42 by Airbazar
How To Get To LIM During The Day? posted Wed Jan 14 2009 12:56:02 by RamerinianAir
Advice Needed:Need To Get A Flight A Day Earlier posted Tue Dec 2 2008 12:20:11 by Bobprobert95
Day Trip To LHR posted Sun Apr 13 2008 09:24:59 by MSPDL
Should I Use CO For EWR-LHR-EWR? posted Tue Apr 24 2007 22:11:30 by CaptainJon