Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SQ J Class To AMS  
User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 862 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 5464 times:

Is this still the J class product on SQ's 772s to AMS?

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...d=e35b5b6f2fbc1210a1ff248dcba791e1

I flew it in 2009, and it seemed severely outdated even then. Trying to find a decent Star Alliance J product to AMS is proving tricky...

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineairbuseric From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 4273 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 5464 times:

Quoting gasman (Thread starter):

Is this still the J class product on SQ's 772s to AMS?

SQ fly B777-300ER to AMS



"The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going"
User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 862 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 5424 times:

Quoting airbuseric (Reply 1):
SQ fly B777-300ER to AMS

Not according to their booking engine for March next year.


User currently onlineAngMoh From Singapore, joined Nov 2011, 492 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 5339 times:

Quoting gasman (Reply 2):
Not according to their booking engine for March next year.

They are reverting back from 77W to 77E end of October when the 77W is moved to the 4th SIN-LHR slot. I am flying SIN-AMS in end November and it is on a 77E.

I asked SQ in AMS about a year ago when they are going to upgrade the flight, and the answer was that they (SQ AMS) asked for that many times, but no permanent upgrade was planned but they would get a 77W if a spare one is available.

My guess is that this will be one of the first A350 flights as the 77W J-class is probably not viable in AMS (same for CPH).

BTW - the 77E is still better than the 415 seat 77W which KLM flies on this route.


User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 862 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5278 times:

Quoting AngMoh (Reply 3):
BTW - the 77E is still better than the 415 seat 77W which KLM flies on this route.

Yes....but nowhere near as good as SQ's own 77W, nor NZ's 77W, nor EK's A380 etc. etc..... all a matter of where one's own personal "baseline" is I guess. Don't forget also, that this is a 13 hour flight. You'd think that assigning a premium J class product would be a priority.


User currently offlineSethor From Australia, joined Oct 2011, 31 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5007 times:

I think we will see a 77W on SIN-AMS route again once SQ start getting 77W deliveries in 2013. My guess is the 8 77W's on order will replace the last of the SV* rego 777-200ER's.

[Edited 2012-09-19 21:01:50]

User currently offlinenethkt From Thailand, joined Apr 2001, 1088 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4877 times:

SQ 77E is still in good shape and the Business class seat (Spacebed?) on this aircraft is still above average, spacious angled lie-flat!!!
I think SQ sees AMS market/load not as lucrative as other European markets where 777-300ERs are in charge with the latest in-flight products. Just like FCO, CPH, IST and soon to be gone ATH.

Having said that, I think this comment is the answer to it all.

Quoting Sethor (Reply 5):
I think we will see a 77W on SIN-AMS route again once SQ start getting 77W deliveries in 2013. My guess is the 8 77W's on order will replace the last of the SV* rego 777-200ER's.



Let's just blame it on yields.
User currently offlineSQSFO From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

Will the remaining SQ 77W be in the low density configuration? And now that we're on it, is AMS a high yielding destination?

User currently offlinefrigatebird From Netherlands, joined Jun 2008, 1645 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4691 times:

Quoting SQSFO (Reply 7):
is AMS a high yielding destination?

No, at least it is not a premium fare destination. That's why CX reverts to a 2-class A343 for AMS. I expect CX to deploy their 3 class (with premium economy but without first class) 77W's at AMS as soon as they receice more (IIRC, they only have 2 of those now).

Quoting SQSFO (Reply 7):

Will the remaining SQ 77W be in the low density configuration?

That's a very interesting question. SQ's low density 77W has less seats than their 2-class 77E's, so it doesn't surprise me AMS will be downgraded to 77E again. So, it could be that SQ's new 77W's will have less premium seats to replace the 2 class 77E's. But it is also feasible SQ wants to wait for their A350s or 787s for the less premium fare destinations.



146,318/19/20/21,AB6,332,343,345,388,722,732/3/4/5/G/8,9,742,74E,744,752,762,763,772,77E,773,77W,AT4/7,ATP,CRK,E90,F50/7
User currently offlineaerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7268 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4577 times:

Quoting gasman (Thread starter):
Trying to find a decent Star Alliance J product to AMS is proving tricky...

NRT/HND-FRA LH 388/ NH77W/788
FRA-AMS LH


User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 2987 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4541 times:

Quoting SQSFO (Reply 7):
Quoting frigatebird (Reply 8):
That's a very interesting question. SQ's low density 77W has less seats than their 2-class 77E's, so it doesn't surprise me AMS will be downgraded to 77E again. So, it could be that SQ's new 77W's will have less premium seats to replace the 2 class 77E's. But it is also feasible SQ wants to wait for their A350s or 787s for the less premium fare destinations.

The new 77W's due next year will likely debut the new product, so I imagine will be premium heavy to get the new seats to key markets in the US/Europe quickly. Existing aircraft will be retrofitted with the new product, so perhaps we will see a higher density configuration (potentially without F given CX's recent moves) emerge to replace the 77E's down the track.


User currently offlineSethor From Australia, joined Oct 2011, 31 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 1 month 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4510 times:

Quoting SQSFO (Reply 7):
Will the remaining SQ 77W be in the low density configuration? And now that we're on it, is AMS a high yielding destination?

IMO not really, I flew in J on AMS-SIN about a three weeks ago on the 77W & it would have been 50-60% full in J.

Quoting frigatebird (Reply 8):
That's a very interesting question. SQ's low density 77W has less seats than their 2-class 77E's, so it doesn't surprise me AMS will be downgraded to 77E again. So, it could be that SQ's new 77W's will have less premium seats to replace the 2 class 77E's. But it is also feasible SQ wants to wait for their A350s or 787s for the less premium fare destinations.

The 77W's on order are going to launch new business & first class seats, I'm sure these new planes will have similar density to the ones already in the fleet.


User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 862 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3949 times:

Quoting nethkt (Reply 6):
SQ 77E is still in good shape and the Business class seat (Spacebed?) on this aircraft is still above average, spacious angled lie-flat!!!

Can't let this one go unchallenged. Anything less than a horizontal lie flat seat cannot be considered "above average" in this day and age, particularly on a 13 hour sector. Similarly, the circa 2005 IFE on these seats is anything but "above average". The only reason of course that SQ an get away with this on the SIN-AMS leg, is that KLM's J class product with its 2-3-2 config, is even worse.


User currently offlineSethor From Australia, joined Oct 2011, 31 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3746 times:

Well it looks like the 77W will be back, taken from SQTalk.

"Singapore Airlines Jan – Mar 2013 Amsterdam Operation Changes
by JL
Update at 1435GMT 05OCT12

From 07JAN13 to 12MAR13, Singapore Airlines is adjusting operational aircraft on Singapore – Amsterdam route. 3 of 7 weekly flights will switch from 777-200ER to -300ER.

Schedule:

SQ324 SIN2355 – 0645+1AMS 772 x124
SQ324 SIN2355 – 0645+1AMS 77W 124

SQ323 AMS1030 – 0555+1SIN 772 x235
SQ323 AMS1030 – 0555+1SIN 77W 235

http://airlineroute.net/2012/10/05/sq-ams-jan13/"


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LX Or SQ J Class From JFK To Europe posted Mon Feb 11 2008 11:50:19 by Ansett767
LH415 Diversion To AMS posted Thu Jul 26 2012 14:23:08 by dalca
KL643 Returned To AMS? (7th June 2012) posted Thu Jun 7 2012 13:37:59 by climb1
XL Airways Galaxy Class To NYC posted Wed Jun 8 2011 11:54:05 by CuriousFlyer
SV Business Class To SIN posted Mon Oct 11 2010 13:05:17 by AI151
CO Or DL J Class To TLV? posted Mon Aug 2 2010 10:22:28 by mptpa
J Product On SQ's 3 Class 772 And 773 (non ER)? posted Tue Oct 27 2009 02:10:46 by Ozvirginuk
First Class To BLR posted Sun Aug 30 2009 23:07:30 by Skane340
Connection BRS To AMS posted Fri Aug 21 2009 06:37:12 by KL1291
Best J Class To India? posted Fri Aug 7 2009 07:52:11 by Max550