Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
1 Hour Enough At FRA With LH?  
User currently offlineKurtjeter From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 96 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

Flying fro EWR into FRA on LH, and one hour after scheduled landing is my LH city-liner to DRS.
Enough time? Do I collect my luggage/got through customs at FRA or at DRS?

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineglbltrvlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 770 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3592 times:

You'll have to clear Immigration at Frankfurt. The airport is divided up into zones - Transit and Schengen/domestic. Theoretically you go through Customs with your carryon only. If your checked bags were checked through, you do not pick them up and recheck.

60 minutes is the minimum for a non-Schengen - Schengen transfer. You are betting that your incoming flight arrives on time, that there is a gate or pad available, if pad, that the bus is there, and that there isn't a huge line for Immigration. If everything goes well, you should make it.


User currently offlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6616 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3549 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I did a transfer with LH from a MEX flight to one that departed for EZE. If I had only had 60 mins I would not have made it. I personally don´t think it´s enough. However, if you are flying with one ticket and the airline who sold it to you says it can be done, they are obliged to protect you if you don´t make the connection.

User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9118 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3546 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

The airlines offer 60 minutes transit time in FRA, but my personal experience shows that it can be possible with good weather, no traffic, short walking distances...

In many cases 60 minutes will be tight, especially during winter... I often hear from the flight manager: "we are still waiting for connex passanger, we are not sure if they gonna make it...".

When I transit via FRA I give myself at least 90 minutes of time or even more...

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 27339 posts, RR: 60
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 20 hours ago) and read 3476 times:

I always allow minimum two hours at FRA . The min connecting times are just that ''Minimum'' so take the stress out of it all and allow for delays .

User currently offlineTheCommodore From Australia, joined Dec 2007, 3014 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 19 hours ago) and read 3463 times:

Quoting OA260 (Reply 4):
I always allow minimum two hours at FRA .

Absolutely .

The waiting times to get through customs can be very long and slow. Give yourself more time and do a bit of "spotting"
 



Flown 905,468 kms or 2.356 times to the moon, 1296 hrs, Longest flight 10,524 kms
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9828 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 19 hours ago) and read 3458 times:

I had a 70 minute connection in FRA last year IAD-FRA-GVA and missed the connection. 20 minutes late on arrival, bus gate, line at immigration, line at security, and my connection was gone. Fortunately LH is relatively good at rebooking and I just had to wait 2 hours for the next flight to GVA.

My personal experience with FRA is that it is a bit confusing if you have never been there and 90 - 120 minutes at a minimum is best. There are multiple levels and wings with some schengen and some non-schengen, and it isn't always intuitive where to go after a red eye flight from the US. The bus gates certainly don't help either.

If it was Munich, I'd say you are fine. However FRA is not as well organized and the bus gates can waste a lot of time.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 3398 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 6):
If it was Munich, I'd say you are fine. However FRA is not as well organized and the bus gates can waste a lot of time.


I can verify that MUC is excellent. Had a late arriving flight (on UA go figure) and ended up with 30 minutes from the time we touched down till the LH departure to Naples. We parked on a hard stand took the bus to the terminal and got to our gate in less than 20 after we touched down. No way could you have told me we would make the connection.

One would think FRA would adopt the MUC concept and make it very very simple when in transit particularly.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8771 posts, RR: 42
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months ago) and read 3373 times:

Considering the bus gates: that situation has improved since the opening of the new A+ pier. You're now less likely to get "treated" to an apron tour in freezing rain.

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 7):
One would think FRA would adopt the MUC concept and make it very very simple when in transit particularly.

Um... nice idea, but how would you go about doing that? MUC was built from scratch in the 1980s, out in the boonies with space for expansion, some of which was used for the LH/Star Alliance terminal #2. FRA on the other hand opened as an airport and airship base in 1936, is almost impossible to expand (for a variety of reasons) and its high passenger numbers make any complete rebuild of a terminal impossible - can't demolish it when passengers are using it.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineTurkishWings From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1453 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3366 times:

Quoting AR385 (Reply 2):
I did a transfer with LH from a MEX flight to one that departed for EZE. If I had only had 60 mins I would not have made it.

Sorry but did you just say you flew MEX-FRA-EZE or am I too tired to read correctly?



Coffee - Tea or Me?
User currently offlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6616 posts, RR: 35
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3331 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TurkishWings (Reply 9):
Sorry but did you just say you flew MEX-FRA-EZE or am I too tired to read correctly?

Yep. That´s what I did:

Journey: MTY-MDZ; Part 2 MEX-FRA, LH 499 C (by AR385 Dec 6 2010 in Trip Reports)?threadid=184176&searchid=184483&s=Journey+MEx-FRA#ID184483

Journey: MTY-MDZ; Part 3 FRA-EZE, LH 510 F (by AR385 Dec 30 2010 in Trip Reports)?threadid=184148&searchid=185272&s=Journey+FRA-EZE#ID185272


User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3298 times:

My wife and I flew IAH-FRA-HAM with a 70 min connection. I concur that the only bottle neck seems to be at customs as the line from the morning bank of flights transferring from Z gates to domestic gates can be VERY long. One thing I found is that this area has a Biz Class line for which if one has a level of status you can utilize the it if you ask nicely of the supervising staff. I had Oil & Energy Club membership status (also gains you access to the Business Class Lounge) and was able to get both my wife as well as another traveling companion through customs in less than 5 min. Had we waited in line like everyone else, we would have missed the connection to Hamburg altogether.

[Edited 2013-01-31 07:27:35]

User currently offlineirregking From Germany, joined Feb 2008, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3293 times:

Hi,

FRA is my homebase. Irregs and misconnex my specialty (hence my username )

I know sales promotes the 60min connex time however please give yourself at least 90min to be on the safe side.
Honest advice, nothing more.

Hope you enjoy flying with us!



Worked on: A300,310,319,320,321,332,333,342,343,346,380,B732/3/4/5,744,DC10 -- Currently working on: A380 only
User currently offlinen729pa From UK - England, joined Jan 2011, 444 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3274 times:

A few months ago I had HAM-FRA-LHR journey booked, and the original flight HAM-FRA was about 70 min connection with FRA-LHR flight, which I was a bit worried about, being the last flight too. So I managed to get myself onto an earlier HAM-FRA flight instead and then for an experiment rushed to the gate to see how quickly I could transfer (via the underground tunnel) and including passing through Customs to leave the country, I did gate to gate in 20 minutes from different wings parts of the terminal. I was quite impressed actually. Then had ages to wait so did a bit of spotting and shopping instead and had a real Frankfurter in FRA too!

I don't like tight connections, you might make the flight and your bags don't sometimes. Travelling should be enjoyed so why rush!


User currently offlineFreshSide3 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3248 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

1 Hour is enough in FRA......IF you are an overwater Star Alliance flight AND are continuing to another EU country on LH. Had no problems with that. In other cases, one hour is probably not enough.

MUC of course, is a better connection hub......and VIE and ZRH are more problematic than FRA.


User currently offlineKurtjeter From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3241 times:

Thanks to all who responded. Helpful advice, guys, I appreciate it!

User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26021 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3228 times:

Quoting FreshSide3 (Reply 14):

MUC of course, is a better connection hub......and VIE and ZRH are more problematic than FRA.

I agree that MUC is much better than FRA but I disagree that ZRH is worse than FRA. Just the opposite in my opinion. I consider ZRH on a par with MUC in efficiency and convenience.


User currently offlineFreshSide3 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3036 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 16):
I agree that MUC is much better than FRA but I disagree that ZRH is worse than FRA. Just the opposite in my opinion. I consider ZRH on a par with MUC in efficiency and convenience.

I once flew LX from CDG, and connected inter-Europe on LX in ZRH, and the time was sufficient, no problem. But a few months ago, I did go UA transatlantic-to-LX inter-Europe in ZRH..........and barely made it.......between the passport control, a train, and a gate almost at the end of the concourse. (And no restroom or coffee stops along the way, either).


User currently offlineLOWS From Austria, joined Oct 2011, 1192 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3024 times:

Quoting FreshSide3 (Reply 14):
MUC of course, is a better connection hub......and VIE and ZRH are more problematic than FRA.

I'm willing to bet that you've not been through the new Austrian Airlines/Star Alliance terminal? The minimum connection time is 35 minutes, and I have gone IAD-VIE-SZG with the connection in VIE made in 25 minutes (back of a full 767, through security/immigration and into the Schengen level)


User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 27339 posts, RR: 60
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

Quoting FreshSide3 (Reply 14):
ZRH are more problematic than FRA.

No way . ZRH is a breeze and I have over 50 transits under my belt. Also half of those have been inbound from ATH( Schengen) to DUB ( Non Schengen) and connection was an hour. I have never mis connected. That was when they had closed the non schengen Pier and used a temporary area. Now the new Pier is open at the D Gates and its even better. I used it this morning and ZRH is my choice over any European Aiport.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26021 posts, RR: 22
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

Quoting OA260 (Reply 19):
ZRH is my choice over any European Aiport.

ZRH is good but I prefer MUC, especially for longhaul connections where all Star Alliance connections are in the same building. That underground shuttle train to/from the longhaul gates is an added compllication at ZRH.

I still much prefer AMS over both MUC and ZRH.


User currently offlineFreshSide3 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2939 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LOWS (Reply 18):
I'm willing to bet that you've not been through the new Austrian Airlines/Star Alliance terminal? The minimum connection time is 35 minutes, and I have gone IAD-VIE-SZG with the connection in VIE made in 25 minutes (back of a full 767, through security/immigration and into the Schengen level)

Not recently. Haven't been to VIE in about three years, so the situation is apparently different now. How is it for the Arrows and Tyrolean services, though? Are they at the same terminal with the rest of Star?? I remember when I went to HRK via VIE, they were not only segregated from the standard size planes and had to take a bus for remote operation, but also had to go through another security checkpoint. What's it like nowadays concerning OS express carriers to Eastern European destinations??

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 20):
That underground shuttle train to/from the longhaul gates is an added compllication at ZRH

Definitely. And was pleasantly surprised that the bags showed up, too. Still, I didn't expect it to take nearly that long.

Quoting TurkishWings (Reply 9):
Sorry but did you just say you flew MEX-FRA-EZE or am I too tired to read correctly?

I did have some friends on airline staff travel that need to get to Suriname, and ended up going from SFO via IAD and AMS.


User currently offlineLOWS From Austria, joined Oct 2011, 1192 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2908 times:

Quoting FreshSide3 (Reply 21):

Not recently. Haven't been to VIE in about three years, so the situation is apparently different now. How is it for the Arrows and Tyrolean services, though? Are they at the same terminal with the rest of Star??

There are still remote stands, but with every Star Aliiance carrier and service under one roof it's very easy to do.

It is 1000x better than the old setup.


User currently offlinefalstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 6177 posts, RR: 29
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2702 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TheCommodore (Reply 5):
Absolutely .

The waiting times to get through customs can be very long and slow. Give yourself more time and do a bit of "spotting"

I have never officially connected at FRA, as far as the airlines are concerned. When I go to Germany I go to LEJ so I usually fly DL DTW-FRA and then collect my bags and go and check in with LH for the FRA-LEJ flight. I usually give myself three hours to do this, but one time I got through everything very fast and was able to make an earlier flight. I made it through all the hurdles in less than 45 minutes, it might have been a record.  

I could make things easier to by booking DTW-FRA-LEJ on LH, but I want the skyteam miles out of DTW. You used to be able to fly AF DTW-CDG-LEJ, but the layover at CDG was LONG, so it was way faster to go the other way.



My mug slaketh over on Falstaff N503
User currently offlineTheCommodore From Australia, joined Dec 2007, 3014 posts, RR: 8
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2652 times:

Quoting falstaff (Reply 23):
I made it through all the hurdles in less than 45 minutes, it might have been a record.

I reckon your right, 45 mins is not bad at all !

Quoting falstaff (Reply 23):
but the layover at CDG was LONG,

Yeah. Each time Ive been through CDG (5 times) has been an awful experience, VERY long ques, within the Schengen area and rude unhelpful check-in staff. The last time I was there was last summer. The terminal inside was SO SO hot ,stuffy and humid. The other thing that stood out at CDG, was there were not enough seating areas for passengers waiting for connecting flight, people were lying/sitting all over the place.

Will never travel through there again If I can possibly avoid it...CDG is bad news indeed.



Flown 905,468 kms or 2.356 times to the moon, 1296 hrs, Longest flight 10,524 kms
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
6 Hour Layover At FRA posted Sun Jun 12 2011 00:54:13 by jlarsson
LH Transit At FRA And Seating On EWR-FRA posted Mon Apr 20 2009 13:25:29 by SQ_EK_freak
Is 1 Hour Enough Time In FRA posted Mon Apr 28 2008 18:23:18 by Jamie86
LH Business Lounges At FRA.....? posted Fri Feb 9 2007 18:06:54 by Paul
Hotels At FRA posted Wed Jan 2 2013 12:35:11 by SK736
Is A 60min Int'l. Connection Ok At FRA? posted Tue Feb 28 2012 10:44:33 by IAHworldflyer
Connecting At MAD With Ryanair posted Wed Jan 11 2012 07:30:53 by airtrainer
1 Hour Enough To Make A Flight - MAN posted Thu Sep 1 2011 10:13:48 by aivisavia
10 Hour Layover At JNB posted Tue Jun 21 2011 14:34:11 by Eltomzo
3.5 Hour Layover At LAX posted Wed Jun 1 2011 09:13:21 by 727tiger