IrishAyes From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 2050 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (11 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4177 times:
I'm trying to see what the big selling point is. The interface definitely looks "newer" and cleaner than FlightMemory, and the sync with FlightRadar24 is cool, but is it worth the time to re-load all of the flight data from previous years?
next flights: msp-iah-dal, dfw-ord-msp, msp-ord-lax-las, las-ord-msp
aerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 6876 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (11 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3998 times:
I use both F-mem & F-Diary. They're useful for different things. F-diary is hopeless for specific aircraft variants. I want that I flew a 737-522 rather than just a 737-500, however it is good for faster searching of the library.
EIDAA From Ireland, joined Oct 2006, 827 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (10 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3633 times:
I have accounts in both, but certainly have more data loaded in Flight Memory. To be honest, the statistics functions on Flight Memory are far better in my view. I just wish the maps were more like Flight Diary, it's only real failing.
classicjets From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3410 times:
I tried FlightDairy for its zoomable map and visually appealing charts, but the site is missing a lot of functionality compared to FlightMemory. FlightDiary is missing many of the smaller airports I've flown in and out of and only allows the input of aircraft operators in its rather limited database.