Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Your Dream Midsize Turboprop  
User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3494 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2846 times:

With 50-seat RJ flying slowly being cut by the majors and the fleet of midsized (30-40 seats) turboprops reaching their end of life cycles there will be a huge gap in the market from 19-seaters to 70-seaters (with ATR the only maker of a 50-seat TP) If you could design the NG TP what would you have in itP

Here is my wishlist (no particular order)

Glass cockpit
Combo pax/cargo door
Galley w/oven(s)
Lavaratory
6J/30Y 36"/32" seat pitches; power ports
1,200+nm range
Noise/vibration reduction technology
800m/2,650ft. MinTOL
5-blade carbon fiber propellers
6'2"/1.9m cabin height; mainline overhead bins
365 mph cruise speed
WiFi and/or seatback IFE
Under US$20MM

and now your dream------


"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5460 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2804 times:

Speaking as a passenger, the old Electras were pretty nice. I think in all-first config they seated about 64 pax, maybe around 90 for the two-class versions. It was a nice ride. I'd welcome the equivalent back.


I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineMesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3160 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2680 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Mine would be a two-class Q400 with AVOD, WiFi, and lower-mounted wings, so you can see out the windows better.


\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4852 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2660 times:

Quoting bjorn14 (Thread starter):
(with ATR the only maker of a 50-seat TP) If you could design the NG TP what would you have in itP

Here is my wishlist (no particular order)

Save for a few deviations, isn't that basically this?.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Terence Li


.....and it's not exactly flying off the assembly line.....

Quoting bjorn14 (Thread starter):
Under US$20MM

Good luck!         

[Edited 2013-08-06 22:46:28]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3494 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2619 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 3):
Save for a few deviations, isn't that basically this?.....

Your half right...its a mixture of an ATR42-600 and a Do328

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 3):
Good luck!

The current 42 sells for US$14MM so I should be good.



"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11655 posts, RR: 60
Reply 5, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2597 times:

I would suggest there will be demand for two aircraft families in the future:

30 and 50 seat turboprop:

- Four abreast seating
- Average cruise speed
- RFFS Cat 3 for the 30 seater and 4 for the 50 seater
- STOL performance for sub 800m runways
- Proven but rugged technology

80, 110 and 140 seat turboprop:

- 5 abreast seating
- Average cruise speed
- RFFS Cat 5 for the 80 seater, 6 for the others.
- STOL performance from sub 1,200m runways
- Proven technology


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4852 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2477 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 5):
30 and 50 seat turboprop:

- Four abreast seating
- Average cruise speed
- RFFS Cat 3 for the 30 seater and 4 for the 50 seater
- STOL performance for sub 800m runways
- Proven but rugged technology

Wish Bombardier would be bold enough to launch a completely updated/upgraded Q200...    ...

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andy Graf - VAP
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Markus Mainka




"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11655 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2443 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 6):
Wish Bombardier would be bold enough to launch a completely updated/upgraded Q200...

They would be better to develop a clean sheet 30-50 seater and create a larger family with C Series commonality to replace the Q400. The Q200/300 are good aircraft, but they are a fair bit more plane compared to the ATRs and I'm not convinced that a Q200NG alone would work, you would need a 50 seater too.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4852 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2439 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 7):
They would be better to develop a clean sheet 30-50 seater and create a larger family with C Series commonality to replace the Q400. The Q200/300 are good aircraft, but they are a fair bit more plane compared to the ATRs and I'm not convinced that a Q200NG alone would work, you would need a 50 seater too.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Stephen Liard
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andy Vanderheyden


I think ATR has the 50+seat TP market covered but they're not making much of a headway despite being the sole OEM offering a new generation airframe in that segment. Competing with ATR there and coming up with a completely new, bigger TP as the market suggests might be too much for Bombardier. As it is, they already have their hands full with the much delayed CS100 first flight (not to mention CS300). Continuing unchallenged in the Q200 niche (though not very lucrative) might be all BBD and its suppliers could manage at the moment. They could then go on from there when conditions are better. 



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3494 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2338 times:

From what I understand the big problem with the '42' is that it has the same economics as the '72' I was hoping I could fix that by making it lighter, more room for cargo, more carbon fiber parts.


"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7704 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2336 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 3):
Under US$20MM

Good luck!
Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 5):
- Proven technology

How about an AN-140?  

Plym, I assume you've flown that type probably more than once, how is it? Admittedly it has one too many blades per engine, but it looks lovely.



✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11655 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2305 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 8):
I think ATR has the 50+seat TP market covered but they're not making much of a headway despite being the sole OEM offering a new generation airframe in that segment.

Part of the problem is that the 42 is at the wrong end of the scale of economy. A 30 and 50 seater joint development would result in a more competitive 50 seater. But another big part of the problem is the 72's performance - it has very similar STOL capabilities to the 42 and is slowly hoovering up the 50-70 seat market. Hence a new 30/50 seat aircraft would have to beat it.

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 8):
Competing with ATR there and coming up with a completely new, bigger TP as the market suggests might be too much for Bombardier. As it is, they already have their hands full with the much delayed CS100 first flight (not to mention CS300).

In time that wouldn't be an issue in my opinion, the C Series might be guzzling resources but the Q400 and CRJ programs are not exactly booming.

Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 9):
From what I understand the big problem with the '42' is that it has the same economics as the '72' I was hoping I could fix that by making it lighter, more room for cargo, more carbon fiber parts.

The economics aren't so much the problem, rather that the 72's performance has improved so much that it is taking market share away from the 42.

Quoting RussianJet (Reply 10):
Plym, I assume you've flown that type probably more than once, how is it? Admittedly it has one too many blades per engine, but it looks lovely.

Yeah I've flown a few of them, it's a fine aircraft actually - comfortable cabin, nice ride and looks great inside and out. Shame it didn't get the production support required for it to be a serious contender.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6048 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2277 times:

It'd be nice if Embraer looked into building a new E-120, based on the E-145 frame, with pusher props, but they have SJS, and aren't looking back.


Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Your Dream Route And Airline posted Tue Nov 2 2010 16:11:51 by luvtheflying
Your Dream Flight? posted Tue Sep 29 2009 23:43:10 by Boeingfever777
Your Dream Amenity Kit posted Thu Dec 11 2008 17:37:11 by Zrs70
Your Dream Alliance posted Thu Oct 9 2008 06:57:19 by Ben175
Whats Your Dream Fleet? posted Sun Nov 26 2006 22:55:30 by Alaska737
Your Dream Route Vacation... posted Sat Oct 28 2006 05:03:01 by QXatFAT
What Would Be Your Dream RTW Trip posted Mon Aug 28 2006 18:47:09 by Antdenatale
How Does Your Dream Route Go? posted Sat May 20 2006 12:32:50 by Robbie86
Your Dream Alliance? posted Sat Jul 9 2005 13:19:48 by B742
Make Your Dream Airline Here posted Sun May 29 2005 02:20:49 by Checo77